-moz-user-select:none; -webkit-user-select:none; -khtml-user-select:none; -ms-user-select:none; user-select:none;

Thursday, October 28, 2010

Preliminary Report on Abenaki Petition for Tribal Recognition - [Exhibits]: March 12, 2002: Exhibit 2 - Continued:

H. R. Schoolcraft
Historical and Statistical Information
on the Indian Tribes of the United States
1851-1854
See abstract of Schoolcraft's work in table at beginning of Exhibit 2. The abstract is based on an examination of Schoolcraft's six-volume work which is available at the Special Collections Department of the University of Vermont Libraries.
Smithsonian Institution
Bureau of American Ethnology
Bulletin 30
Handbook of American Indians
North of Mexico
Edited by Frederick Webb Hodge
In Two Parts
Part 1
Washington
Government Printing Office
1907
PREFACE VIII (Page 08)
ABIHKA-ABNAKI Page 02
ABNAKI Page 03
ABNAKI Page 04
ABNAKI Page 5
MISNAGUA Page 879
Missiassik (on the etymology of the name, see McAleer, Study in the Etymology of Missisquoi, 1906). An Algonquin tribe or body of Indians belonging to the Abnaki group, formerly living on Missisquoi river in N. (northern) Vermont. Whether they formed a distinct tribe or a detached portion of some known Abnaki tribe is uncertain. If the latter, which seems probable, as the name "Wanderers" was sometimes applied to them, it is possible they were related to the Sokoki or to the Pequawket. They had a large village at the mouth of Missisquoi river, in Franklin county, on Lake Champlain, but abandoned it about 1730 on account of the ravages of an epidemic, and removed to St. Francis, Quebec. They subsequently sold their claims in Vermont to the "Seven Nations of Canada." Chauvignerie in 1736 gives 180 as the number of their warriors of 800. They seem to have been on peacable terms with the Iroquois.
The American Indian in the United States
Period 1850 - 1914
By Warren K. Moorehead, A.M.
The Present Condition of the American Indian;
His Political History and Other Topics
1914
The Andover Press
Andover, Massachusetts
Chapter III. The Indians Today
and Hon. E.E. Ayers Report
Page 32
The American Indian
Diagram of the Indian Service
The Indians are under the jurisdiction of the State of Maine. The Penobscots own all the islands in the Penobscot River between Oldtown and Millinockett. They are, for the most part, guides, farmers, carpenters, clerks and lumbermen. Many of them earn excellent wages--from $2 to $5 per day. I saw no evidences of poverty. The people are intelligent and of good character. Consumption is not common, and trachoma cases are rare.
Page 33
THE INDIANS TODAY

The reason for the splendid condition of the Penobscot and Passamaquoddy Indians should not be lost upon our officials and Indian Committees in authority in Congress.
They have been surrounded by a high class of white people, and have been left alone to develop and progress. While they have been protected by the State of Maine, no discrimination has been made against them, as in the case of Indians in Oklahoma, Minnesota, California and elsewhere. They enjoy the same citizenship as is conferred upon Whites, and its does not consist of "paper promises," but is real and effective. Theirs is no story of dishonesty and disease.
The past summer, while on an archaeological expedition on the St. John River, I visited three villages occupied by Malacite Indians, in New Brunswick, Canada. All of them are well situated, one at the mouth of the Tobique River; another at Edmonton; and a third near Woodstock. While these Indians are poor, there is no general pauperism, and their general health is better than among the Indians I have visited in our United States (exclusive of Maine).
In one respect the plans followed by the Canadian officials are superior to ours, and evidence more ability (or rather stability) in the handling of the Indians. Instead of allotting these Indians, giving theirs deeds to valuable property, permitting them to be swindled by unscrupulous white persons, and then spending years in profitless litigation, in an attempt to make grafters return property taken from the Indians, these Canadians have continued the reservation system under a modified form. The Indians own their tracts of land, as with us, but do not hold deeds, or trust patents to same, therefore the lands cannot be sold or mortgaged; thus the incentive to fraud is removed.
The Indians serve as farmers, guides, carpenters and fishermen. Most of them are Catholics, and there is a priest located at the Tobique, village. He lives among them and encourages them in various arts. The census gives a few Indians as residing in our eastern states, but they are white people in every way, save color. To discover the next body of Indians exceeding more than three or four hundred, we must go down South where we find a few bands of Cherokees in Swain and Jackson Counties, North Carolina; and scattered throughout Tennessee, Georgia, and Alabama there are 1100 or 1200 residing on what was originally a part of the habitat of this great nation.
Some of the Iroquois still reside in western New York, notably in settlements not far from Buffalo. These Indians, as in the case of the North Carolina Cherokees, are chiefly mixed-bloods, have adopted our

THE INDIANS TODAY
Page 35 
customs, live in fairly comfortable houses and are in no need of Government supervision. Among the Iroquois of New York, the percentage of tuberculosis and other diseases was so low as to be practically nil. In one of the recent Government reports it is given as but a fraction over one per cent.

There has recently developed agitation seeking to break up their reservation. This is most unfortunate, as the tracts are small; the Indians are doing well and desire to be let alone. They deserve to remain in peaceful possession of their old-time homes.

All of the remaining Indians east of the Mississippi, and south of the Great Lakes need not enter into our discussion. Save for a noticeable Indian color in the case of some individuals, the bulk of them have ceased to be real Indians. The New York Iroquois, in recent times, have made creditable progress in arts, and have produced a number of prominent men and women: A large number of them serve in responsible positions and so far as they are concerned there is no Indian problem. We may, therefore, eliminate the eastern half of the United States, with the exception of Wisconsin, Michigan and Florida.
In Florida we have the descendants of the Seminoles, estimated at 600, and are an offshoot of the Creeks, or Muskokis. These still cling to their ancient homes in the Everglades, and have withstood all attempts to make of them either educated Indians or agency Indians. During Mr. Leupp's administration, he proposed to me that I go to Florida and spend a winter cultivating the friendship of these Indians and see if it were not possible to persuade them to send their children to school. I was unable to carry this mission into effect, but I understand that recently the Government sent a Special Agent there, who has compelled a number of the children to attend school. The draining of the Everglades is now well under way, and soon the hunting and fishing-grounds of these people will be very much restricted. They have always been self-supporting and they merit consideration, and should have our help. It is to be hoped that before the ditching of the Everglades is completed, these Indians will be properly provided for. This is a subject I would commend to the attention of the Federal authorities.
In Wisconsin we have quite a large number of Indians at the present, time, located on reservations, or clustered about schools. These number 9,930, and Wisconsin ranks ninth in the entire country in point of Indian population. Wisconsin is the first State, on our inspection tour from the East to the West, wherein we find a large body of Indians still in the transition period. They belong to the following bands: — the Ojibwa (Chippewa), Menominee, Potawatomi, Oneida, Winnebago and a few others.

Preliminary Report on Abenaki Petition for Tribal Recognition - [Exhibits]: March 12, 2002: Exhibit 2 - Continued:

An Alphabetical Enumeration of the Indian Tribes and Nations
ABENAKIES, over Maine till 1754, then went to Canada; 200 in 1689; 150 in 1780.
Indians and Tribes Page VI (06).
Mass.--AGAWAM (Wampanoags), at Sandwich, Mass.; others at Ipswich, ii. 46.
Maine--ALSIGUNTAKOOK (Abenaki), on sources Androscoggin, in Maine. iii. 136, 152.
Maine--AUOSISCO (Abenaki), between the Saco and Androscoggin River. ii. 48, iii. 93
Maine--CANIBAS, (Abenaki), numerous in 1607, and after, on both sides of the Kennebeck River.

Indian Tribes and Nations VII (07).
ECEMMINS--(Canoe-men) on River St. Johns; include Passmaquoddies and St. Johns.
Indian Tribes and Nations VIII (08).
GANAWESE, on the heads of Potomoc River; same as Kanhaways, probably.
GAYHEAD, Martha's Vineyard; 200 in 1800; in 1820, 340.
HASSANAMESITS, a tribe of Nipmuks, embraced christianity in 1660. ii. 51, 115.
Mass.--HERRING POND, a remnant of Wampanoags, in Sandwich, Mass.; about 40.
LENNA LENAPE, once from Hudson to Delaware River; now scattered in the West.
Indian and Tribes IX (09).
MANHATTANS, (Mohicans) once on the island where New York city now stands.
MARACHITES, (Abenakis) on the St. Johns; a remnant remains.
MARAPEAGUES, once on Long Island, 8. side of Oyster Bay; extinct.
MASHPEES, (Wampanoags) 315 in 1832; Barnstable Co., Mass.; mixed with blacks.
MASSACHUSETTS, the state perpetuates their name. ii. 42.
MITCHIGAMIES, on of the five tribes of the Illinois; location uncertain.
MOHEGANS, or MOHEAKUNNUKS, in 1610, Hudson River from Esopus to Albany. ii. 87, 97.
MONTAUKS, on E. end of Long Island, formerly; head of 13 tribes of this island.
NARRAGANSETS, S. side of the bay which perpetuates their name. ii. 21, 23, 38, 53.
NASHUAYS, (Nipmuks) on that river from its mouth, in Massachusetts.
NATIKS, (Nipmuks), in Massachusetts, in a town now called after them.
NIATIKS, a tribe of the Narragansets, and in alliance with them. ii. 67.
NIPMUKS, eastern interior of Mass.; 1,500 in 1775; extinct. ii. 18, 40, 100; iii. 91--Mass.
NORRIDGEWOKS, (Abenakis) on Penobscot River. See Book iii. 119, 127.
NYACKS, (Mohicans) or MASHATTANS, once about the Narrows, in New York.
Indians and Tribes X (10).
PAWTUCKETS, (Nipmuks), on Merrimac River, where Chelmford now is; extinct.
PAGANS, (Nipmuks), 10 in 1793, in Dudley, Mass., on a reservation of 200 acres.
PENOBSCOTS, (Abenakis) 330, on an island in Penobscot River, 12 miles above Bangor.
PENNAKOOKS, (Nimpuks) on Merrimac River, where is now Concord, N.H. iii. 94, 95.
PIQUAKETS, (Abenakis) on sources Saco River; destroyed by English in 1725.
PEQUOTS, about the mouth of the Connecticut River; subdued in 1637. ii. 101-110.
QUABAOGS, (Nipmuks) at a place of the same name, now Brookfield, Mass.
QUODDIES. See PASSAMAQUODIE.--3 Coll. Mass. Hist. Soc. iii. 181.
RIVER, (Mohegans) S. of the Iroquois, down the N. side of Hudson River. iii. 97; v. 14.
Indians and Tribes XI (11).
SCATTAKOOKS, upper part of Troy, N.Y.; went from New England about 1672.
SHINIKOOKS, a tribe of Long Island, about what is now South Hampton.
SIX NATIONS, (Iroquois) Mohawk, Seneca, Onondaga, Oneida, Cayuga, Shawane.
SOKOKIE, on Saco River, Maine, until 1725, when they withdrew to Canada.
STOCKBRIDGE, NEW, (Mohigans and Iroquois) collected in N.Y., 1786; 400 in 1820.
TARRATINES, E. of Pascataqua River; the Nipmuks so called the Abenakis.
Indians and Tribes XII (12).
TUNXIS, (Mohegans) once in Farmington, Conn.; monument erected to them, 1840.
WAMESITS, (Nipmuks) once on the Merrimac River, where Lowell, Mass., now is.
WAMPANOAG, perhaps the 3rd nation in importance in N.E. when settled by the English.

Tuesday, October 26, 2010

Preliminary Report on Abenaki Petition for Tribal Recognition - [Exhibits]: March 12, 2002: Exhibit 2 - Continued:

Eleventh U.S. Bureau of the Census: 1890
Report on Indians Taxed and Indians Not Taxed in the United States
(Except Alaska)
Introduction: Page 03
Page 04
A Report to the Secretary of War of the United States, on Indian Affairs, Comprising a Narrative of a Tour Perfored in the summer of 1820, Under the Comission from the President of the United States, for the purpose of Ascertaining, for the use of the Government, the Actual State of the Indian Tribes in our Country: By the Rev. Jedidiah Morse, D.D. Printed by S. Converse 1822.
Page 22 and 23
Page 66 and 67
Page 360 and 361
Page 362 and 363
Page 372 and 373
Page 374 and 375
The Book of the Indians on Biography and History of the Indians of North America, from it's first discovery to the year 1841.
By Samuel G. Drake
Ninth Edition
Boston
Benjamin B. Mussey
1845
Preface

Monday, October 25, 2010

Preliminary Report on Abenaki Petition for Tribal Recognition - [Exhibits]: March 12, 2002: Exhibit 2 - Scholarly Surveys of Indians Conducted Between 1782 and 1974 :

Exhibit 2:  Scholarly Surveys of Indians Conducted Between 1782 and 1974
Surveys of Indians Conducted Between 1782 and 1974
These surveys list tribes existing at the time of they were written or researched. None identifies the Abenakis as a tribe in Vermont, other than as once having been there in the 18th century as an outpost of the Canadian Abenaki village of Odanak (St. Francis).

1782 Thomas Jefferson
Notes on Virginia

Jefferson listed Indians in two tables which he compiled from available sources of his day. His lists are called Indians Northward and Westward of the United States in 1782, and Indians Within the Limits of the United States in 1782. Neither list includes a tribe of Abenaki in the area now know as Vermont. He lists Abenaki only in Canada near Trois Rivieres.

1822 Jedediah Morse
Report to the Secretary of War of the United States on Indian Affairs, Comprising a Narrative of a Tour Performed in the Summer of 1820

Morse was given the task of ascertaining the number of the various tribes in the United States. He compiled an extensive list and enumeration of Indians throughout the country. He found "Abenaquies" in Maine, but lists none in Vermont. His statistical table identifies Indians in New England in enclaves as small as 40 "souls." Any group of Indians functioning and holding itself out as a tribe should have received notice.

1845 Samuel G. Drake
The Book of the Indians; or, Biography and History of the Indians of North America, from its First Discovery to the Year 1841

Drake undertook to "locate the various bands of Aborigines, ancient and modern, and to convey the best information respecting their numbers our multifarious sources will warrant." He was a sympathetic observer of Indians, as he criticizes the wrongs done to the Cherokees in the Preface to his book. He identifies the Abenakies as "over Maine until 1754, then went to Canada; 200 in 1689; 150 in 1780." He does not identify any Missisquoi or Vermont Abenakis in his list of 465 Indian groups.
1851-54 H.R. Schoolcraft
Historical and Statistical Information on the Indian Tribes of the United States

Schoolcraft's six-volume work was prepared under the direction of the Bureau of Indian Affairs. It was an extensive study of the numbers, location, and status of Indians at the time. Schoolcraft himself was married to a Chippewa Indian. He had a fair amount of contact with Vermont and the surrounding region, since he was born in Albany County, New York, and attended Middlebury College. He spent time at Trois Rivieres, Montreal, and Caughnawagha learning the Mohawk language in the 1790s. (Frances Nichols, Index to Schoolcraft's U.S. Indian Tribes)

None of the tables in Schoolcraft's six-volume work show Missisquoi or Abenaki in Vermont. None of the references to the Abenaki currently locate them around Lake Champlain. Instead, he describes them as "[a] tribe of Indians formerly inhabiting the territory which now comprises a part of the States of Maine and New Hampshire." (vol. III, P. 512). He writes that the Abenaki are now "seated at the village of St. Francis" in Quebec. He says the territory they inhabit is "situated on the south of the St. Lawrence, between the St. John's of New Brunswick and the river Richelieu, Canada." (vol. IV, P. 542).

1907 Frederick Webb Hodge
Handbook of American Indians North of Mexico, Smithsonian Institution Bureau of American Ethnology, Bulletin 30

Hodge's well-known work for the Smithsonian Institution "treats all of the tribes north or Mexico, including the Eskimo .... It has been the aim to give a brief description of every linguistic stock, confederacy, tribe, subtribe or tribal division and settlement known to history or even to tradition, as well as the origin and derivation of every name treated, whenever such is known..."

He describes the history of the Abnaki, tracing their displacement from Maine to Canada. He notes that "[t]he descendants of those who emigrated from Maine, together with remnants of other New England tribes, are now at St. Francis and Becancour, in Quebec, where, under the name of Abnaki, they numbered 395 in 1903." (p. 3-4). In addition, he notes the number of Penobscot and Passamaquoddy currently in Maine.

He identifies the "Missiassik" as a historical subgroup, not a present day entity in the United States. He states that it was "[a]n
Algonquian tribe or body of Indians belonging to the Abnaki group, formerly living on Missisquoi r. in N. Vermont." (p. 872) He explains that "[t]hey had a large village at the mouth of Missisquoi r. in Franklin co., on L. Champlain, but abandoned it about 1730 on account of the ravages of an epidemic, and removed to St. Francis, Quebec." (p. 872).

1914 Warren K. Moorehead
The American Indian in the United States, Period 1850-1914: The Present Condition of the American Indian, His Political History and Other Topics; A Plea for Justice

Moorehead's report includes a chapter on "The Indians Today," in which he identifies groups of Indians continuing to live in tribal relations, such as the Penobscot and Passamaquoddy in Maine. However, he sees no significant group in Vermont. He notes that although the census of 1910 lists Indians in the eastern states, most of them "are white people in every way, save color." (P.33, 35) To discover the next body of Indians of more than 300 or 400, he looks to New York State and south to North Carolina.

1934 Gladys Tantaquidgeon
The New England Indians

Tantaquidgeon was an anthropologist who studied under Frank Speck; she was an Indian herself as well. Her study for the Commissioner of Indian Affairs describes the current state of the Indians in New England. She writes of Abenaki in Maine, but does not find any in Vermont.

1948 William Harlen Gilbert, Jr.
Surviving Indian Groups of the Eastern United States

Gilbert's study was prepared for the "purpose of indicating the extent to which Indian blood still remains noticeable in our eastern States population." His paper was prepared as a report for the Smithsonian Institution. He addresses each of the Eastern States individually. For Vermont, he writes: "No surviving social groups of Indians are recorded for Vermont, although the census records a few scattered individuals." (p. 409).

1952 John R. Swanton
The Indian Tribes of North American, Smithsonian Institution Bureau of American Ethnology, Bulletin 145

Swanton's comprehensive compilation of information on all the known Indian groups in North America recognizes the historical
Abnaki group in Vermont, stating that "[a]n Abnaki band known as the_Missiassik was at one time settled on Missisquoi River in Franklin county." (p. 18). He says that the main body of Abnaki were located in Maine, with the Mississiak representing a "late intrusion," into Vermont. (p. 13). He observes that all of them "finally withdrew to Canada where they were settled at Becancour and Sillery, and later at St. Francis, along with other refugee tribes from the south." (p. 14-15).

1968 William Sturtevant and Samuel Stanley
"Indian Communities in the Eastern States," Indian Historian Journal, vol. i (June 1968)

These members of the Smithsonian Institution, Office of Anthropology, published this article in order to address the Indians in the Eastern States, who "tend[ed] to be ignored in discussions of Indian affairs and Indian 'problems."' They surveyed all the Indian and "possible Indian" communities of which they were aware. They list no Indian communities in Vermont.

1974 Alfred Tamarin
We Have Not Vanished; Eastern Indians of the United States

The purpose of Tamarin's study was to determine whether the Indians had vanished from the Eastern States, as was commonly thought. "To find the answer required long hours of research and weeks of travel—from the top of Maine to the foot of Florida." (p. 12). Tamarin's investigation led him to the following conclusions about Vermont: "Vermont is the home of over 200 American Indians, probably from tribes throughout the East as well as the rest of the country....Vermont's modern Indian citizens are not descended from the state's original inhabitants." Tamarin does identify a community of Abenakis - in Lake George, NY, not in Vermont.

Preliminary Report on Abenaki Petition for Tribal Recognition - [Exhibits]: March 12, 2002: Exhibit 1 -Examples of Records Used by the Bureau of Indian Affair in the Acknowledgment Process :

Preliminary Report on Abenaki Petition for Tribal Recognition
[Exhibits]
State of Vermont
Office of the Attorney General
William Griffin, Chief Assistant Attorney General
Eve Jacobs-Carnahan, Special Assistant Attorney General
March 12, 2002
Exhibit 1 Examples of Records Used by the Bureau of Indian Affair in the Acknowledgment Process
Page 14 of BIA or OFA Pamphlet
Page 20 of BIA or OFA Pamphlet
Page 38 of BIA or OFA Pamphlet
Page 42 of BIA or OFA Pamphlet
Page 43 of BIA or OFA Pamphlet

Page 51 of BIA or OFA Pamphlet
Page 52 of BIA or OFA Pamphlet
Page 53 of BIA or OFA Pamplet
Page 71 of BIA or OFA Pamphlet
Page 73 of BIA or OFA Pamphlet
Page 79 of BIA or OFA Pamphlet
Page 80 of BIA or OFA Pamphlet

Search This Blog