-moz-user-select:none; -webkit-user-select:none; -khtml-user-select:none; -ms-user-select:none; user-select:none;

Tuesday, October 7, 2014

A Response from "Chief" Paul Joseph Bunnell and a bit more information regarding Jeanne Lincoln Kent etc.

October 06, 2014 - 10:37 PM:
Paul Joseph Bunnell's Response:

Douglas,
"You can find many native mixes in nearly every native nation just like spouses, adopted members, and as I said, today most tribes, and especially NE tribes are mixed/Metis. This doesn't mean that they can't reside in the organized areas. In this case, the Abenaki, Huron, MicMac and other Algonquin tribes have moved in and out of, and or settled in all the areas they exist in today. This is fact in today's melting pot. But in no way will I denounce any ethnic part of my heritage I wish to enjoy and learn from. I have direct relatives who settled in Rutland, Vermont in 1848, and I also have many related native bloodlines in the Vermont and New Hampshire areas, not to forget my Canadian and other areas of native lines. If native bloodlines are established in Koasek territory for nearly 200 years, then they should have the right to declare it in the native community." 
"One of my other lines are New Brunswick Loyalists which I am also proud of. That ancestry area is very close and dear to me, because it also is home of my Acadian and more Native lines. My town of birth is Amesbury Mass. Does this mean I cannot belong to my ancestral relatives there? People have the right to celebrate any or all of their ancestral heritages. No one can take those choices away from them. The Algonquin peoples are all related. My Metis statement is fact. Show me a pure blood Abenaki? The geographical areas I mentioned in our research discussion doesn't change the fact that all these traditional lands were settled or hunted in by most of our ethnic native peoples in the past 5000-10,000 years. Before that, this area was two miles under ice. So, I guess this also really means that we are all Cherokee, Muscogee,Seminole, Chickasaw, and Choctaw nations from the Southern states."

This identity game is fine, if you are identifying non-natives, but the persecution tactics you are conducting is no worse then the Perkins extermination programs of the 1920-30's [Eugenics Survey of Vermont]

You remind me of the Twilight Zone episode where the evil man investigates everyone by his standards, and tried to destroy them, but at the end, he was shrunken down to a little weasel of a tiny man 3 feet high.

I guess I let you use me long enough. I feel sorry for you little man. Now it's my turn, is it not?"

Chief Paul J. Bunnell, UE, Author, Professional Genealogist
Gwilawato (He looks For Something)
Chief, Koasek Abenaki Nation & Tribal Genealogist
http://bunnellgenealogybooks.citymaker.com
Koasek Traditional Band of the Sovereign Abenaki Nation
For Koasek Business contact: Koasek@yahoo.com

Website: http://www.KoasekAbenakiNation.org
32 Hoit Mill Rd. #202, Weare NH 03281
Loyalty Is Everything

MY RESPONSE:

MORE EXCUSES for Paul Bunnell's appropriation of ... if his Metis statement is in fact .... FACT ... then he ought to have had no issue(s) or problem(s) whatsoever, of my posting his stated FACT that his group, as well as the other four groups are merely "METIS" groups ... and NOT ABENAKI TRIBES.

Mr. Paul Joseph Bunnell has searched his 'ancestral garbage can' (as any good genealogical-minded person tends to get addicted doing) and he's looked for any scrap of INDIAN / Native American Ancestry that he can find (it's like winning the Lottery these days....), and joined up with Nancy Lee (nee: Millette) and Nate Pero etc. subsequently he developed a persona of being an "Abenaki" or a "Koasek" etc.

Or is he Metis?

Just look at all those "title's" he lists.... if that isn't an EGO, I don't honestly know why it has been so important to claim he's a Chief, and a so-called "Professional Genealogist" etc.

Then again, there is A LOT of people that have quite DISTANT Native Ancestors, in the 1600's or 1700's ... and BELONG to NO COMMUNITY of NATIVE PEOPLES, KNOW NO NATIVE LANGUAGE, and have joined post-1974 CREATED INCORPORATION(S) that claim to REPRESENT _________ "Tribe" and so on ....

I think you got the idea, if you have read this blog's content.

"My 7th Great Grandmother was a Siberian Indian Shaman" and NOW I am an "Abenaki" from and of Vermont, and am ENTITLED to grants, status, identity and anything else I can get my grubby little thieving hands on ... 'cause I SAY I am an "Abenaki" .... 

Paul Joseph Bunnell DOES NOT LIKE TRANSPARENCY, and obviously he doesn't like my previous post of this evening. Ohhhhh well ...

There wasn't any untruth to what I posted. He said it. I got the emails right here.
And perhaps Nancy Lee Millette was a descendant of a Huron woman Catherine Pillard, of the 1600's, whose descendants that were claiming and self-identifying as FRENCH or ENGLISH or WHITE, migrated to Vermont? It's a VALID INQUIRY to my thinking, considering Christopher Shawney was Nancy's ancestor!

Shawney = Shonyo/ Shinnio = Chagnon? Paul Bunnell's SAYS he didn't find ANY Native Ancestor connection(s) in Nancy Millette's ancestry. He had a vested interest not to find any connection(s) of native ancestry, in her genealogical background, to my thinking. Perhaps I am wrong?

Comparing me NOW, to a Eugenic's Advocate? Give me a break! I simply stated that having a 7th Great Ancestor whose HURON does not make the 7th Great Grandson an Indian nor an Abenaki ... this isn't ethnocide or genocide or anything of the like. It's simple common sense.

Nathan Elwin Pero has made certain claims and assertion(s) about his ancestor(s) being Chief's of a Koasek Abenaki Tribe, from 180 year ago to the present....

Ok, so where is the PROOF, the clear and convincing EVIDENCE of his claims?


And HERE:




Vermont Politicians, the VCNAA, and these FAKE WANNABIAK "ABENAKI" Incorporate Created Groups will HIDE their LIES and DISTORTIONS and Tactics of APPROPRIATION from the naive Vermonter and the GENERAL PUBLIC and the legitimately historical and cohesive Native Communities.

I chose not to hide their claims or their words....

Now Mr. Bunnell wants to imply that I am some sort of worse-than-the-Eugenics Survey - of Vermont and New Hampshire of the 1930's?

I guess TRANSPARENCY is a bit harsh for this "Chief" of the so-called "Koasek" "tribe" eh?

This isn't about self-identification or celebrating one's distant/remote ancestors, whoever they might be.

This State Recognition IS very much about stealing a culture identity, that does not belong to Mr. Paul Bunnell etc. nor any of these four other groups claiming now to be "tribes" .... of course, they will ALL claim to be thee Vermont "Abenakis" because $$$$ is involved, etc.

I do not follow or adhere to the 1-Drop-NDN-Rule.

Show us the actual factual ABENAKI ANCESTRY for 51% percent of ANY of the Vermont's four groups OR this 5th group that now seeks to gain Vermont State Recognition, transparently and openly.

If Paul Joseph Bunnell can't, which I know he can't (his group is comprised of Wannabiak, just like the other four groups in VT) because, as he SAID and states as FACT, they are METIS.

They have redefined the meaning of being an Abenaki -and- redefined the meaning of Metis as well, to suit their own created persona's, agenda's, and political dynamics.

So, I am a little man, according to Paul Joseph Bunnell, Chief of a Wannabiak "Tribe" of FAKE Koasek Abenakis, that uses a revisionist history filled with distortions, half truths and lies against the Historical and Contemporary Abenaki Peoples.

I guess Paul Joseph Bunnell was hoping I wouldn't ascertain his ancestors as well?

Dated 31 July 2005 - Book Review - French & Native North American Marriages, 1600-1800      

Here is a great review of my book by Norm Leveilee, renown Native American Researcher. His website is: http://www.leveillee.net/roots/index.html He writes the following:

Késsinnimek - Roots - Racines
Mon Petit Coin   by   Norm Léveillée
A Book Review
The revised editon of Paul Bunnell's book French And Native North American Marriages 1600-1800 is a marvelous book dedicated to all our Native American and European ancestors who married to create a new nation of Métis. Paul has spent considerable time in this second edition, bringing up-to-date data based on more accurate resources.

In the introduction, Paul writes:
This work is dedicated to my Huron ancestors to whom I am related, in some cases several times.
And for the next two pages, he lists several of his Native American and European ancestors:

"Nicola Arendanki/Anenontha (Huron) who married Jeanne Otrihouandat/Otrihandit/Otrihoandit (Huron); Germain Doucet (possibly Micmac) married Marie Jeanne Bourgeois...;Jean Claude Landry (Micmac) married Marie Sale/Salle;...;Martin Aucoin married a Métis Woman (needs more research...); Pierre Lejeune married a MicMac/Mi'qnak Woman; Radegode (MicMac oral history says she was of First Nation People married Jehan/Jean Lambert are among those listed as his ancestors."

Again, these Ancestors are in the 1600's ... how does these ancestors, make Paul Joseph Bunnell born in Amesbury, MA and now living in New Hampshire, an Abenaki, let alone a Koasek or a Metis person?

Does he or his ancestral descendant from these stated ancestors ever LIVED IN a Native Community that was historically to contemporaneously defined, observable, by ANYONE?

I have an genealogical and genetically verifiable ancestor paternally,  Margreta Knadchen / Knoedgen who married Johann Wilhelm Rozenbach / Rosenbaugh in the early 1800's from Nassau, Deggendorf, Bayern, Deutschland, Germany.

I think I will claim to be GERMAN, and claim that ethnicity (because I love Germany and German Songs etc)...

But, you know, IF I went to Germany and made such outlandish claims about being a German, not speaking the language fluently, not coming FROM a German Community etc, the German people would laugh (even if politely behind-my-back, and rolling their eyes).

I also have direct relatives still living in both Vermont and New Hampshire; that doesn't make them or me "Abenakis" or a "tribe" ... Jeanne Antoinette (nee: Lalime) Lincoln - Kent TRIED to pull that number too Mr. Bunnell, claiming HER daughter Bonnie moved to Vermont, therefore Jeanne Kent herself was an "Abenaki" (I'll post more on her, like I said afore, when I get good and ready to do so).

Did you know she had a METIS Membership Card from Claude Aubin's group out of Aylmer, in the Province of Quebec, Canada No. #M 00360 -and- she was a member of the Paul Wilson Pouliot's wannabiak group too? How MANY "tribes" as she dipped her old toes into over the years? 4-5-6-7 or 8? And now she is a "Nulhegan Abenaki" whose got "Vermont State Recognition". 

She said it (I didn't) quote, "You should see what we have to put up with. Visit the website, and look at the comments of two of the people continuing to verbally attack Abenaki people with inaccurate information, even though we are recognized. Very Sad." 
Dated December 13, 2012 at 2:15 a.m.

I don't need to verbally attack anyone. I simply post the documents and add commentary. People choose to read my posts and commentary. They are welcome to leave the blog site and stop reading the blog content, at ANY TIME they so choose. There is No Hook set in anyone's ass, to assume this blog is a verbal attack on the Abenakis or any other legitimate historical or contemporary Wabanaki Nation or Community that has been COHESIVE, and CONTINUOUS genealogically-historically-and socially. I do not consider ANY group in "New England or Quebec, post-1974 to within this parameter of definition.

There are lots of DESCENDANTS out there; that does not make these DESCENDANTS Abenakis, Penobscots, Mohawks, Cowasucks, Pennacooks, Mi'Kmaq's, Maliseets, Cherokee's, Blackfeet, Lakota's or the like. Especially not because of some 9th Great Grand Ancestor, whose descendant(s) join Indian-ist Incorporation(s) throughout, simply because they want to PLAY INDIANS/ PLAY ABENAKIS etc.

Admittedly, and honestly, this is a blog about Wabanabiak, FAKE "Abenakis" throughout the past and present.... and FAKE Wannabiak "Tribes" within New England.

Of course, I get feedback from all corners of New England, about these wannabiak. Inaccurate information? Please.... does this look like inaccurate information?


I've got a lot more documents regarding Jeanne Lincoln Kent, etc which I will be posting in this blog. Jeanne Lincoln Kent was most definitely looking to funnel her genealogical records THROUGH Bruce Dubois, to Odanak, in her attempt(s) at the time, to gain official Abenaki Tribal Membership Status, in and at Odanak. The documents and letter(s), correspondence between Jeanne Lincoln Kent and Bruce Dubois prove this out.

And "Bruce" is none other than Bruce Louis Dubois, of Arizona that is mentioned in the above attached document. 

He claimed falsely to be descended from the Abenakis at Odanak, like the Bruchac's have attempted to imply as well retrospectively (more on them later).

Bruce Dubois had been claiming for years, to both the late Odanak Chief, Gilles O'Bomsawin, and to Richard Bernier, that he factually was descended from Simon Obomsawin and Catherine Degonzague's ALLEGED daughter Helene Catherine Obomsawin born at Odanak on June 08, 1847 and died August 31, 1921 in Chicopee, MA ....

But, I met with Bruce Dubois when he came to Vermont a year ago or so, and began looking into his genealogical background as he was enroute to Vermont. He had the same like-minded response to me, as Paul J. Bunnell does now towards me, when I showed him the documented genealogical records, showing, the correct and accurate ancestry for Bruce Louis Dubois. Not what HE SAID or IMPLIED, but what his ancestors SAID and DOCUMENTED of themselves.

There was NO DAUGHTER that this Obomsawin couple had, by the name of Helen Catherine Obomsawin, and if they had such a daughter (hypothetically speaking) she did not marry Francois Forcier / Fusha / Fisher on June 16, 1864, as Bruce L. Dubois had alleged.

1. Chief Atsena Du Plat 8endat Attign8stan and Annengthon HURON
2. “Catherine” 8enta Plat (Pillard) HURON
3. Marie Catherine (nee: Charon) Chagnon dit Larose
4. Marie Angelique (nee: Chagnon) Benoit dit Livernois
5. Marie Angelique (nee: Benoit dit Livernois) Tétreault dit Ducharme
6. François Tétreault dit Ducharme
7. François Marie Tétreault
8. Ursule (nee: Tétreault) Fontaine
9. Ursule (nee: Fontaine) John Ayöt
10. Rose Mary (nee: Ayöt) Forcier
11. Hélène Rose (nee: Forcier) Dubois
12. Bruce Louis Dubois

Bruce's mother had a Mazipskwik Membership Card, of which this Spin-Off Group was led by Connie Brow and David Gilman, retrospectively, upset with Homer Walter St. Francis, Sr. they created a new "tribe" of which Michael Delaney and his wife Ina became members of as well. Charles Lawrence Delaney was in numerous "tribes" as well, just like Jeanne Lincoln Kent -and- now he too is a Nulhegan Tribal Member? 

How was Bruce Louis Dubois, an Abenaki, when the only Native Ancestral connection detected thus far, is to a HURON woman in the 1600's?

Oh I get it. The Huron People were part of the Wabanaki, and Abenaki is a corruption of Waubanaki, so therefore a Huron = a Wananbaki = equates to being an Abenaki, right Rhonda? Or is it simply because a father SAYS so, or because a husband claims to be a "Chief" too?

I guess I am confused?

Francis "Frank" Forcier / Fisher born Feb. 15, 1842 in Vergennes, VT married on Jan. 16, 1864 in Ferrisburgh, VT to Mary Ellen Jane June Helen Laurent dit Larro.

Obviously she weren't an Obomsawin! 

And this is why I detest wannabiak like what's being created in Vermont and New Hampshire etc, by those seeking State "Recognition" based on lies, distortions, and outright absurdities. Appropriating genealogical connection(s) and ancestors that are clearly not-their-ancestor(s). Even some of my own Woodward kith and kin have attempted to do these tactics, naively enough, in the past, using a very early 1900's Alfred S. Campbell colorized photographic image of a Kahnawake Mohawk Indian Actor, by the name of Sose Akwiranoron a.k.a. Joseph Beauvais, who was a MOHAWK (NOT an Abenaki at all). They claimed it was their ancestor! Without doing ANY research, without doing any validation of who it was in the image, for years. That is, until I came along, and became aware of the photographic image, and the myth my relatives created around it, and about it, etc. The image isn't of Parker Preston Woodward, nor his son Darius Adrias Woodward, nor of Herbert Chester Woodward ...

Photograph in the Woodward-Phillips Family
of
Sose Akwiranò:ron
aka 
Joseph Beauvais
1872-1913

And some that I have found over the years (below) ...






I could have perpetuated the Woodward-Relative Myth regarding this image.
I chose not to claim someone else's ancestry for my own.

To claim one is a Chief of an Abenaki Koasek Tribe and yet the ONLY discernible Native ancestral connection, is to a HURON woman in the 1600's?

I am not perpetuating 'ethnocide' or 'genocide' or 'eugenics' against anyone by stating as I have on this blog, the documents, and my commentary.

My Woodward kith and kin were in the Eugenics Survey of Vermont, I doubt Paul Joseph Bunnell even laid eyes on the Eugenics Records, let alone, actually understands WHO were targeted, and or WHY those persons were targeted.

Of course, he probably buys into the MYTH that the Eugenics Survey was targeting the Abenakis of Vermont, because they were Abenakis/ Indians.

So, take a look at Paul Joseph Bunnell's Genealogical Record.


I see Metis (allegedly). I see Mi'Kmaq (allegedly). I don't see him jumping up and down trying to claim he's Italian or being an Italian Chief of an Italian Social Club.
And I do not see ANY Vermont Abenaki Ancestry at all in his genealogical mapping.

Yet, he and they claim to be "Koasek" "Abenakis" From and OF Vermont.

And let's not forget this little communication:

From: BunnellLoyalist@aol.com  
Subject: Resignation Again 
To: bdmortz@yahoo.com, brialcay@yahoo.com nathanepero22@hughes.net houseofmica@yahoo.com wobanaki@Kingcon.com grand_conseil@abenakis.ca trainconn@adelphia.net tcmmjpg@yahoo.com DanHughesjr@aol.com eislinn_99@yahoo.com redsoxmatt545@juno.com normsroyalstar@yahoo.com DrRaymondL@aol.com gonefishin1958@localnet.com singing2feathers@yahoo.com emsugarhouse@aol.com descoteaux_richard@yahoo.com Cc: magoua.clan@gmail.com jeffrey.hubbard@pw.utc.com roony_311@hotmail.com TomM@egcrc.net, osgoodsr@yahoo.com

Date: Sunday, May 15, 2011, 3:59 PM 
Dear Koasek Traditional Band of the Sovereign Abenaki Nation. 
I can no longer hold the tribe together. I have done nearly everything for everybody through all the hostility and after our leadership walked away leaving everything vacant, I still tried to hold everything together as Nathan was placed under the impression of being assigned chief, which I went along with until he needed so much help that I was asked to help him by being chief for a short while until he was more versed in tribal business. The weaknesses that were obvious in the past in this area are still obvious now; in communication. It takes a lot of communication and hard work and drive to run a tribe. I have been that engine the last several years, always doing my duty to the fullest. I have been used in the past to keep people from getting into office, used to prove chiefs false genealogies, used to hold the entire tribe together, used to bridge relationships in other tribes who use to be hostile or distant, I have been cut out of talks with tribal merger plans, asked to formed a new tribe by council member, and I heard everybody’s complaints and fights always being the in between person long enough. Now I am being used here to disintegrate our tribe while it was already being dissolved by our leadership who left it. Everyone has their own agenda and poor pity party. No one ever took the time out to recognize I was in there putting thousands of hours of hard work into this tribe with no return from anyone. This is my last communication and I suggest all these records be destroyed because I am tired of getting threatening request for all these people striking back at me by way of these damn records. I am not taking anymore offers of saving this drowning nation. In fact it is dead. This is my final resignation and from everything. I will not be taking Calls, Emails from anyone. I will only answer by mail from Nathan how he wants these records, and money and the money better be returned to the proper people involved in Newsletter, Donations, etc. I will await your request by mail to pick up these items and money and reports. I will not be here to make anyone feel awkward. You make arrangements and a family member will assist you. I Quit. My Time Has Ended. 

Paul Bunnell 

Paul J. Bunnell, UE, Author, Professional Genealogist Gwilawato (He looks For Something) Ret. Sub-Chief of the Koasek Abenaki Nation & Genealogist http://bunnellgenealogybooks.citymaker.com 
My Logo Store Items - http://www.cafepress.com/bunnellgenealogybooksgifts Koasek Traditional Band of the Sovereign Abenaki Nation. Website: http://www.CowasuckAbenaki.comhttp://violettefamily.

And now Paul Joseph Bunnell and his group want Vermont State Recognition, because they claim to be ... "Koasek Abenakis"

I think not.

The 5th Group is no better than the previous 1, 2, 3, or 4th Groups ... claiming to be ... Vermont's Re-Invented "Abenakis"

"Little Man" I might be, but I also have the researched documents to prove what I claim and comment on.

Let's see Mr. Paul Joseph Bunnell and or Nathan Elwin Pero have that same transparency and honesty about who they really are, and who their ancestors really were?

I won't hold my breath ....

Monday, October 6, 2014

More thoughts on the "Koasek Traditional Band Of The Sovereign Abenaki Nation" group led by Nathan Elwin Pero and Paul Joseph Bunnell Etc....

Too many people believe common myths when it comes to Abenaki genealogy. They often use these myths to explain why they believe they are Abenaki but cannot prove it. We heard these myths used repeatedly when VT Senator’s Vincent Illuzzii & Hinda Miller and their supporters were trying to give the concocted VT Indigenous Alliance's 4 groups, with their Johnson State College Professor Frederick Matthew Wiseman, literally a pass on their lies about having Abenaki Historical Community and Genealogical Connection to the Abenakis. We still hear these excuses today.

Here are some of the most common myths being perpetuated by these VT/NH "Abenaki" and their supporters (and others).

1 – There are no records.

There are plenty of records to prove one has Abenaki ancestry, if they truly do. Nancy Lecompte, Christopher Roy, Denis Watso, Richard Skip Bernier, and even I have found MANY RECORDS on varied families having historical and contemporaneous CONNECTIONS to the Abenaki.

2 – It is hard to prove Abenaki ancestry.

If one is Abenaki, then they will find many or at least some records to show it, as explained in my posts herein this blog.
I have even DISPROVEN many of my own families MYTHS concerning particular photographs and "oral history," with FACTUAL historical documentation.

3 – If your family isn’t on the Odanak or Wolinak Abenaki Communities, then you can’t prove you have Abenaki ancestry.

One does not have to have an ancestor listed as being from Odanak or Wolinak to show they are an Abenaki descendant. Time and time again, we see Abenakis living elsewhere, such as Sartigan, Quebec -Sudbury Ontario, in Canada Etc; in Troy, New York, and even in varied places within Vermont, New Hampshire, Rhode Island, Massachusetts, and Connecticut..... Even New Jersey, Florida and California! Abenakis live everywhere. But their ancestral CONNECTIONS ought to connect at some point to having lived within a historically identified cohesive continuous Abenaki COMMUNITY. And within the previous 100 years those ancestors ought to have been identifying as Abenakis or Indians, associating with other Abenakis/Indians.

4 – Indians could only be listed as white or black on the census.
Since 1860, people could be and were listed as Indians on the US Census, as explained on the blog Polly's Granddaughter - Indians on the US Census.

5 – Everyone from Vermont/New Hampshire probably has Indian/Abenaki/Pennacook ancestry.

Yes, we hear this a lot from “scholar” John Scott Moody, David Stewart Smith, and Professor Wiseman, that Abenakis are “hiding in plain sight” ready to pop out of the woodwork. Just raise your hands and claim to be Abenakis; it cool to be Indian now. Even if the evidence that one is Abenaki, doesn’t honestly exist and never did.

The decades before VT/NY and or NH statehood, the non-Indian population exploded in Vermont/New Hampshire/Lower Canada territories. If a family was in these areas before statehood, such as Clarenceville, Quebec, Canada, they were more than likely white, because very likely, that's what they were. NOT Indian or Abenakis.

As you can see, they are simply myths, just like Nancy Millette - Doucet's "Koasek Abenaki ancestry". And as you all can see, though the "truthers" continue to try to validate their claims; though their campaigns had plenty of money to hire a professional genealogist on the VCNAA; and though many people (both hobbyist and professional genealogists) were doing their genealogies, not one...NOT ONE SINGLE person has proved me or the little research team (Paul Bunnell, Suzette LeClair nor myself) wrong about many of these newly VT Legislatively Stamped “Abenakis”.

To name just a few here ... Louise Lampman - Larivee, Judy Fortin - Dow, April St. Francis - Rushlow - Merrill, Paul Wilson Pouliot, Nancy Millette-Doucet, Rhonda Lou Besaw-True nor her husband Charles True Jr., Doris Gertrude Chenney-DeCarr-Minkler, Donna Carvalho-Charlebois-Moody and Margaret Bruchac - Kennick (and so many others not listed here) ARE NOT ABENAKIS, so much as they have, none of them, can SHOW or PROVIDE their genealogical connections to the Abenakis historically, socially or genealogically. They can believe what they want to, and the naïve politicians and agencies and grant writers can label these people “Abenaki” but honestly, what does their genealogical records and histories really prove?

Can we expect any differently from the "Koasek Abenaki Nation" or the "Koasek Traditional Band Of The Sovereign Abenaki Nation" group led by Nathan Elwin Pero and Paul Joseph Bunnell?

400 Pages of this 5th Group's membership's genealogies were submitted by Paul Joseph Bunnell in their Application for VT State Recognition.

Does the PUBLIC get to see the genealogical connection(s) to the alleged Abenakis? "Abenakis" closer than 5-6-7-8-9-10-11 or 12 generations out from the member whose in this group?

Those are my thoughts for today.

Thanks for reading.

Nathan Elwin Pero and his late father Elwin Merle "Joe" Pero etc, and the attempt to create a 5th Vermont "Abenaki" "Koasek" "Tribe" in 2014-2015

Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 12:54 PM
From: BunnellLoyalist@aol.com
To: douglaslloydbuchholz@yahoo.com
CC: franbluewolfspirit@gmail.com [Francine Poitras - Jones]

BCC: houseofmica@yahoo.com [Karen nee: Bourdreau aka. Karen Mica]

From: Paul Joseph Bunnell
"Keep in mind that we never did and do not have any desire to get into any of this Vermont Indian crap. We thought recognition would be nice and Nathan thought it would be good for his family. We offered our genealogies to this process, but they fought that suggestion, just relationships. I knew why they took this position because you and I know all the holes many of them have in their genealogies, and though there are Abenaki Metis living in Vermont, there is no Vermont Abenaki ancient ancestors that have been recorded there yet. All the Abenaki I have found, including my several eventually all come from Quebec, Maine, New Brunswick, Nova Scotia."

So, let's take a look at Nathan Elwin Pero and his late father Elwin Merle "Joe" Pero's Native Ancestral Connection:

1. Chief Atsena Du Plat 8endat Attign8stan and Annengthon HURON
2. “Catherine” 8enta Plat (Pillard) HURON
3. Marie Catherine (nee: Charon) Chagnon dit Larose
4. François Louis Chagnon
5. Christophe Chagnon
5. Jean Chagnon dit Larose
6. John Baptiste Chagnon dit Shonyo
7. Clarrisa Cook (nee: Shonyo) Pero
8. Henry Cook Pero
9. Elwin Merle “Joe” Pero
10. Nathan Elwin Pero

1. Chief Atsena Du Plat 8endat Attign8stan and Annengthon HURON
2. “Catherine” 8enta Plat (Pillard) HURON [great-great-great-great-great-great-great-grandmother]
3. Pierre Charron [great-great-great-great-great-great-grandfather]
4. Charles Charron Sr. [great-great-great-great-great-grandfather]
5. Charles Charron Jr. [great-great-great-great-grandfather]
6. Marie Françoise (nee: Charron) Chagnon dit Larose [great - great-great-grandmother]
7. John Baptiste Chagnon dit Shonyo [great-great-grandfather]
8. Clarrisa Cook (nee: Shonyo) Pero [great-grandfather]
9. Henry Cook Pero [grandfather]
10. Elwin Merle “Joe” Pero [father]
11. Nathan Elwin Pero

Now, obviously I KNOW how Nathan Elwin Pero descends from this Huron woman. How many generations down? 10 and 11 generations.

So a 7th great-grandmother, makes the 7th great grandson a Huron Indian or a Metis person? Or a Koasek Abenaki, from and of Vermont?

Ok, so WHAT COMMUNITY does that lineage come from and has retained up to and after 1974 within Vermont? Claiming as Nate does that his father, and his father, and his father, and his father were Chiefs.... of a Cowasuck Tribe or Band within Vermont?

Of what discernible COMMUNITY of native peoples? How did those alleged "Chief's" conduct their "chief-ly" status and position?

You see, without a discernible/externally observable community foundation that FUNCTIONS through time, I conclude that Nathan Pero is merely a DESCENDANT and not Huron nor Abenaki/Cowasuck.

Why? Because his ancestors CHOSE to live in an ENGLISH COMMUNITY, and or his ancestors CHOSE to live in a FRENCH COMMUNITY and identified as ENGLISH and or FRENCH from two generations down from Catherine Pillard to Nathan's grandfather, up to 1974, that's why.

It is absurdity to imply that Nathan Pero or his father were Chiefs of a Cowasuck Tribe of and from Vermont or New Hampshire prior to 1980.

And to use the term Metis, as if it were a catch-all everyone's-an-NDN simply because of a 1-drop-rule ideation, or construct, is again absolutely distorting the history of the Metis' and appropriation of their culture and histories as Metis Communities.

While I know you don't adhere to or think as what I have described here Paul respectfully said, it is the truth. Your group is no more Abenakis, than any of the others that already have recognition within the State of Vermont right now.

This group (through a trickle-down dynamic) has incorporated under Vermont State Law, through the Secretary of State's Office, through the machinations of Howard Franklin Knight, Jr. etc. since the early 1980's, beginning with "Richard Blackhorse" Phillips and several others like Emerson Bidwell Garfield, and Wayne Hoague.

I have retrospectively mentioned within this blog these machinations and scheming tactics to "create" out of thin-air "Abenaki" "Tribes".....

Accordingly:

Chief Paul J. Bunnell, UE, Author, Professional Genealogist
Gwilawato (He looks For Something)
Chief, Koasek Abenaki Nation & Tribal Genealogist
http://bunnellgenealogybooks.citymaker.com
Koasek Traditional Band of the Sovereign Abenaki Nation
For Koasek Business contact: Koasek@yahoo.com

Here's the "Chief" of the 5th groups seeking Vermont State Recognition, claiming to be KOASEK, COWASUCK, KOASUK etc ...

An Abenaki Tribe from and of Vermont.... through the Vermont Commission of Native American Affairs (VCNAA)? ...

Here's what "Chief" Paul Bunnell stated:
"I agree that many native lines exist in most NH & VT members. I have always said that there are no pure Vermont or New Hampshire Abenakis. In fact, every Native American in New England and the Maritime's are really Metis. Many if not most Vermont Natives have Huron blood. It's just the way the migrations went from Montreal/Quebec."

"The Abenaki blood that does run in our veins, comes from outside Vermont beyond c. 1700's."

"The native Vermont and New Hampshire communities [the now VT State Recognized "Tribes" ... the "Missisquoi-Sokoki" of Franklin County, the Nulhegan-Coos Band of Orleans County, VT, the El-Nu of Jamaica, VT, and the "Koasek of the Koas" of the Newbury, VT area] .... have old roots, which is fine to claim the areas they are from, but they are ALL METIS. I feel the native culture is good to revive and claim ... as long as it lays in the area of our Algonquin common heritage. "

So, in conclusion the 5th group, of which was retrospectively a part and parcel of the late Nancy Lee (nee: Millette) Cruger-Lyons-Doucet and Brian Chenevert and of course, Howard Franklin Knight, Jr. concoction in mid-2006 recreation, having a tangled web of incorporate connections all the way back to 1980... are merely METIS?

Again, mis-appropriaton of the Metis history and culture, to allow themselves to also appropriate the Abenaki identity and status..... to my thinking. 

Over 180 years of Tribal Chiefs.
1. Nolka (Deer) Clan – Chief John (Jean) Shinnio 1832 to 1865
2. Cowasuck of the Coos – Chief Clarissa Shinnio 1865 to 1915
3. Cowasuck of the Coos- Chief George Harry Pero 1915 to 1947
4. Cowasuck of the Coos- Chief Elwin (Joe) Pero Chief 1947 to 1981
5. Nolka Clan Chief Nathan Pero 1981 to 2010
6. Chief Howard Knight Jr. 1981 to 2006 Koasek (Cowasuck) Traditional Band of the Sovereign Abenaki Nation (and under previous names) Retired
7. Chief Brian Chenevert 2006 to 2010 Koasek (Cowasuck) Traditional Band of the Sovereign Abenaki Nation
8. Co-Chief Nancy Millette Lyons 2006 to 2007 Koasek (Cowasuck) Traditional Band of the Sovereign Abenaki Nation
9 Sub-Chief Leo Descoteaux .2007 to 2009 (passed over) Koasek (Cowasuck) Traditional Band of the Sovereign Abenaki Nation
10. Sub-Chief Paul Bunnell 2009 to 2010 Koasek (Cowasuck Traditional Band of the Sovereign Abenaki Nation
11 Chief Nathan Pero of Koasek (Cowasuck) Traditional Band of the Sovereign Abenaki Nation 2010 to Present
12. Co-Chief Paul Bunnell Koasek (Cowasuck) Traditional Band of the Sovereign Abenaki Nation 2010 to Present.

Really? Let's see the EVIDENCE clear and convincingly, from either this group calling itself the "Koasek Traditional Band Of The Sovereign Abenaki Nation" .... or from the State of Vermont itself ... instead of IMPLYING kinship and relation and or contemporary members of this group, who do have Abenaki ancestry, having joined the group in contemporary time, like the Boles family members.

And btw, if as I suspect, the late Nancy Lee (nee: Millette) Cruger-Lyons-Doucet does have an ancestor Christopher Shawney b. abt. the late 1700's who married Orinda/ Olinda Marden or Marsten ... she and her cousins would have a distant HURON Ancestor; NOT ABENAKI. NOT SHAWNEE either.

Could Shawney be a distortion of Shonyo or Shinnio? 

Shonyo was a dit name for Chagnon. 

So perhaps when the late Nancy Lee (nee: Millette) came back to Vermont from a NY Mohawk Community, and subsequently created her "Tribe" and then, in an attempt to be Chief-For-Life like the late Homer Walter St. Francis Sr. turned himself into, years before up in Swanton, VT ... and didn't get her way and managed to 'create' the now-State-Recognized group calling itself the
Koasek of the Koas" Abenaki "Tribe" ... and got National Genographic to do her alleged DNA testing ... 

Could she also be a descendant of a HURON woman, Catherine 8enta Plat (Pillard) who married Nicholas Pierre Charron dit Ducharme in 1665? I bet the odds are she was!

But what difference would it have made, really, if she was a descendant?

Nathan Elwin Pero is a 7th Great Grandson of this Huron woman, Catherine 8enta Plat (Pillard).

Ever heard of "RECOMBINATION" in DNA Genetic Genealogical Research?

Each generation gets generally a variable of near or a little more than 50% from each parent, and generally some from each parents Grandparent etc. etc.

This means that by the time, that 'recombination' dynamic hits dear old Nathan Elwin Pero, the percentile of HURON ancestral DNA is pretty much nearly 'gone' and undetectable by today's DNA technological testing processes (autosomal DNA).

Then again, these group's advocate the appropriation and acceptance of their claims and assertions, that they are Vermont's ABENAKIS and or COWASUCK/KOASEK ABENAKIS, with historical merit, continuance, and coherency.

Nathan Elwin Pero nor his father, were not part of a HURON COMMUNITY, so even if they have a HURON Ancestor 7 generations back in their genealogy, it does not make them HURON INDIANS.
It does in fact, show that they have Huron Ancestors.

NOT ABENAKIS, NOT ABENAKI ANCESTRY. 

1. Chief Atsena Du Plat 8endat Attign8stan and Annengthon HURON
2. “Catherine” 8enta Plat (Pillard) HURON
3. François Charron dit Ducharme
4. Marie Charlotte Charon dit Ducharme
5. Jean Baptiste Frechet
6. Marie Louise Branconnier
7. Sara LaDurantaye
8. Wilfred David (or Foster) Robert
9. Lillian Dorothy Roberts
10. Donna Louise (nee: Carvalho) “Roberts” 1. Charlebois  2m. Moody
11. Chrestien Michel Charlebois
12. Ozalie Charlebois

1. Chief Atsena Du Plat 8endat Attign8stan and Annengthon HURON
2. “Catherine” 8enta Plat (Pillard) HURON
3. Marie Catherine Charon
4. Marie Angelique Chagnon
5. Paul Benoit dit Livernois
6. Joseph Simeon Benoit dit Livernois
7. Peter Mitchell Benoit dit Livernois
8. Joseph Benoit dit Livernois
9. Proper Benoit dit Livernois
10. Elaine Clara Benoit dit Livernois
11. Brian Andrew Chênevert

1. Chief Atsena Du Plat 8endat Attign8stan and Annengthon HURON
2. “Catherine” 8enta Plat (Pillard) HURON
3. Marie Catherine Charon
4. Marie Angelique Chagnon
5. Genvieve Benoit dit Livernois
6. Françoise Amable Tétreault dit Ducharme
7. Louis Beaudry
8. Marie Charlotte Beaudry
9. Adélaide Adèle Fornier dit Prefontaine
10. Austin Lambert dit Lumbra
11. Austin Lumbra
12. Lillian May Lumbra
13. Cedric Henry Brooks
14. Brian Basil Brooks
15. Lisa Tonyo (nee: Brooks) Pouliot

Eloise Beil is a Lumbra descendant as well, from the same ancestry as Lisa Tonyo (nee: Brooks) Pouliot.

1. Chief Atsena Du Plat 8endat Attign8stan and Annengthon HURON
2. “Catherine” 8enta Plat (Pillard) HURON
3. Marie Catherine Charron dit Ducharme
4. Pierre Chagnon dit Larose
5. Joseph Chagnon dit Larose
6. Gabrielle (nee: Chagnon dit Beloeil) Lalime
7. Christopher Lalime
8. Jean Beoni Lalime
9. Jean Baptiste Eugene Lalime
10. Marie Joseph Arthur Lalime
11. Joseph Granville Leger Lelime
12. Jeanne Antoinette (nee: Lalime) 1m. Lincoln  2m. Kent


1. Joachim Ouentouen Arontio & Cecile Arendaeronnon Arenhatsi HURON
2. Marie Felix Arontio Aneneontha Ouentouen HURON
3. Jean Baptiste Dubuc I
4. Jean Baptiste Dubuc II
5. Jean Baptiste Dubuc III
6. Marie Rosalie Dubuc
7. Charles Poitras
8. Prosper Poitras
9. Joseph George Ozias Poitras
10. Eucilide Poitras
11. François Eucilide Poitras
12. Francine “Dancing Bluewolf” (nee: Poitras) Jones

Again, NOT ABENAKIS ... from and of Vermont!!

What Abenaki Community do these people live in? What Abenaki Community did their ANCESTORS live in?

The CONTEMPORARY DESCENDANT(S) chose post-1974 to dig around in their genealogical garbage can's looking for any scrap of Indian Ancestry they could find, subsequently INCORPORATED UNDER VERMONT or NH etc STATE LAWS, created GROUPS they now CLAIM TO BE "TRIBES"

And appropriated an "Abenaki" Identity that does not belong to them, with the help of course, from naive Politicians and Anthropologists etc. and a BLIND PUBLIC in and surrounding Vermont's machinations to this agenda to re-create alleged "Abenaki" Tribes" ...

When in reality and FACT, these groups are merely METIS groups claiming to be "Abenaki Tribes" ....

Just like "Chief" Paul Bunnell has asserted.

But that doesn't stop him from claiming their group is the "Koasek Abenaki Nation" or the "Koasek Traditional Band Of The Sovereign Abenaki Nation" ... now does it? 

Again, this whole State Recognition Process, was created out of Ego - Power - and CONTROL, and GREED by the State of Vermont and the groups who today claim to be "Abenakis" and "Abenaki Tribes" as well as about "status" and "identity"...

Why are Eloise Beil and John Scott Moody going to be reviewing this 5th group's Application(s) for VT State Recognition? Isn't that an absolutely conflict of interest?

Each of which has had and does continue to have a "Working Relationship" with these so-called "Abenaki" groups claiming to be "tribes" ... and has and continues to have a vested financial interest as a well as a personal interest, that these groups of alleged "Abenakis" gain Vermont State Recognition, to my thinking.

This whole dynamic is that these people are claiming an Abenaki Identity that does not belong to most of these group's members! 

Stay tuned, I am not done yet ... 



Sunday, June 22, 2014

The "Abenaki" Re-Invention Dynamics are also a Cherokee Re-Invention Dynamic

I have not posted much on this blog for one very good reason:

I am working on chronologically mapping the historical records, genealogical records, newspaper articles and doing field research in both Vermont, New Hampshire and Maine, as well as Massachusetts, Connecticut and New York.

In the meantime, I have recently read a blog post from "Thoughts from Polly's Granddaughter" dated June 17, 2014 wherein the author of that blog stated (in part):

"We all have family stories, and while that might be find and good for sitting around the dinner table, if those stories are inaccurate or untrue, and we allow them to become engrained into our very being they could lead us to make poor decisions based on lies and deception. Over time, that can become problematic and harmful. 
This harm is magnified if one who has been influenced by false family stories becomes a leader of a nation (group) of people and he (or she) allows those false stories to play a role in the decisions he (or she) makes for that nation (group) of people."

Now, in reading this first part of her posting ....
Found here: http://www.pollysgranddaughter.com/2014/06/when-past-meets-present-part-1.html 
I have several thoughts that came to mind, and subsequently some conclusions.

First, the name Homer Walter St. Francis, Sr. of Swanton, Franklin County, Vermont came to mind.
He thought, believed, perpetuated, and promoted to himself, his family, and to anyone that would also believe him, that he and his family "were Abenaki" or "Abenakis."

And yet, he honestly was not Abenaki. Genealogically-speaking he wasn't aware that simply and merely because he lived in Swanton, didn't make him "an Abenaki" nor the fact that his surname was "St. Francis" didn't make him "an Abenaki" either. I very strongly doubt he was aware, that his surname was in fact, a "dit" name in French tradition.

Siroux Giroux dit St. Francis

Indeed, the late Homer Walter St. Francis, Sr. and his familial relatives have in fact a Huron Ancestor, and perhaps even an Algonquin ancestor, MAYBE a Mik'maq ancestor, all of them ancestors (singular) that married FRENCH in the 1600's or 1700's, does not make that family Vermont Abenakis.

It is a reality, that after the quarry died, and the fire happened in Swanton, Vermont in the early 1970's, the community was "hard hit" and the local economy plummeted, and the jobless rate went up.

Indeed, seeing how the Federal Government was "flushing" money "for Indians" after Wounded Knee, etc to varied Tribes throughout and across the United States, into Urban areas, by way of the Boston Indian Council, it was indeed a time of "It's a Good Time to BE INDIAN." And that Homer became, right along with anyone else that would follow him, join him, and promote him. Promoting oneself as being an Abenaki, within Vermont, New Hampshire etc as in Self Identification, was the name of the game. Creating an incorporation and implying it was and is "a tribe" was a huge part of that game, in which to seek, and obtain those Indian Federal Monies, by way of Federal Grants earmarked suddenly in the 1970's for Indians.

Everyone who even remotely vaguely had heard of an Indian, in their ancestral background, uttered from some long dead Grandmother wrapped up in a blanket, smoked a corn cob pipe, and or worn braids, had dark eyes, or had high cheekbones, was instantly put up on the mantelpiece and appraised by the Instant Indian descendants of New England.

And while promoting their incorporations and proclaiming to help the Indians, help themselves, with the "White Man's Money" alongside this promotion were the Archaeologists, Ethnologists and the Folklorists ready to shake hands with anyone that implied or said they were Indian. And the latter began in Vermont and New Hampshire, to ally with and promote the incorporated groups within New England.

Homer wasn't an Abenaki. He wasn't a Wabanaki either. 

And later in the Thoughts from Polly's Granddaughter article post:

...."in these perilous times when the number of fraudulent groups are growing each day; when the BIA is considering weakening the federal recognition process; and when states consider giving fake tribes state recognition."

Well here in Vermont the Legislative Representatives didn't consider the fraudulent tactics and dirty politics, they just went ahead and gave recognition to the fake "Native American" "tribes" without so much as doing any real retrospective research into the four groups backgrounds, genealogically or otherwise!

Indeed, their genealogies, the merits of their scholarly evidence, was manipulated and misinterpreted. No dog wants to check another dog for fleas as they would say.

And when these Thoughts from Polly's Granddaughter posting speaks of lies and deceptions in families, around the dinner table, being taken as being accurate and truth by the listeners descendants, I experienced this myself with my mother's paternal side of the family here in the Northeast.


"Interesting Photograph isn't it? Yes, this is your ancestor, your Great Great Great Great Grandfather named Chief Tomahawk Woodward. His wife was Laughing Sunshine or Mourning Dove or something like that." 

Indeed, this photograph was held by and perpetuated by several members of the Woodward family descendants, who have retrospectively claimed it is their ancestor, even to the point of posting their naive conclusions onto ancestry genealogical oriented websites online.

And then one day, talking to a relative, I heard about another relative, who then I contacted and received a computer print image of this above photographic duplicate. I then sought out yet a third relative who had it, down n Connecticut. She'd had her duplicate ENLARGED and hanging on her kitchen room wall even! She was PROUD that this man was HER Indian ancestry.

The problem:

She was absolutely wrong in her conclusions, about the photograph and about the identity of the man in this photograph. He was not a Woodward, he wasn't even remotely related to the family. Just a mere photograph which was very likely merely picked up somewhere along the ancestral past, from some Flea Market or Antique Store by the way, between Vermont, Connecticut and New Jersey ... and hung on the wall of that Woodward relative's living room wall. Something to point to, when having those dinner table story talks about Indians-in-the-family.

While "Thoughts from Polly's Granddaughter" is oriented to the Cherokee Nation and the dynamics of identity and tribal status etc., the dynamics she addresses are very much as well an Abenaki issue as well, of status and identity.

Homer St. Francis Sr., wasn't 'somebody' if he wasn't Indian, if he wasn't claiming to be "Abenaki." There's nothing to be really gained, in claiming to be French, or Irish, or German, or Scots, or Brit, or even Canadian. But claiming and implying one is an Indian, and be Abenaki, is icing on the cake, and one can even eat the ice cream of being identity special, at the same time.

These groups recently came out in the media, via the State sponsored Websites on Tourism.... I thought that was cute yet none the less any more accurate than before they pulled this stunt in Vermont.

At the Lake Champlain Maritime Museum its written that, "Abenaki historian Frederick M. Wiseman, Ph. D. worked with his students and others, to provide replicas..." and that "El-nu Abenaki Chief Roger Longtoe [Sheehan' and Vera Longtoe create replicas of fishing lures, hooks, sinkers, and net used by Native Peoples in the 17th Century"

So what are these people who now claim to be, and perpetuate that they are "thee Abenakis" of Vermont and New Hampshire, but mere performers, replica makers, and 'artists' who very well learned their craft, their art from books, films, and other people OUTSIDE of Vermont?

They claim they have derived from historical community? I think not.

If one looks closer, more deeper, one can discern that many of the members of these four and or five groups, within Vermont and throughout multiple States, have been Group Hopping throughout the years, since the early 1980's, having multiple memberships (in some cases even overlapping) in several groups throughout New England, and even created groups in Quebec, Canada!

I've never heard of a Lakota hopping over and becoming an Ojibway or a Makah Tribal member. Indeed a Lakota could relocate into the Makah Community at Neah Bay, and marry there, etc. A Penobscot isn't a Wampanoag, or a Mik'maq either. 

I have heard some say "I am Wabanaki"

Isn't that a POLITICAL Organization? Not a People or Person. It is a general terminology for all Wabanakiak, but it is not a person or a tribe nor a community. MAYBE ... I am wrong in this conclusion.



I have heard some Vermonter's (and or from New Hampshire) that claim they are from this or that Clan, such as Bear or Turtle, etc.

But doesn't one have to have a cohesive continuous viable externally discernable COMMUNITY that has actual Naming Ceremonies for that Clan, etc, songs, and dances etc.? 

Pow-wow's don't count, so don't even go there..... and Pow-wow Attendance isn't a legitimate Abenaki Community either, that's like being in the fraternal Improved Order of the Redman, Knights of Columbus, or the Freemasons organizations. I can put on and take off my regalia too. Penobscot doesn't wash off, or hang in a closet or get stored in a box for only when it is convenient to the person. Being Mik'maq etc isn't like wearing a coat or putting on a pair of shoes, or learning beadwork from a book, or listening to a CD, and singing those Pow-wow songs over and over, year after year. 

'Parrotting' Abenakis is what is happening in Vermont and New Hampshire. Picking up a presumed mimicked "culture" from books, and associating with Odanak, Akwesas:ne and so on, from OUTSIDE VERMONT and NEW HAMPSHIRE isn't "community" WITHIN Vt. or NH. Incorporations don't make a Tribe either. And Vermont State Recognition under that State's Laws doesn't make these groups El-nu, Missisquoi-Sokoki, Nulhegan or Koasek any more legit than yesterday. They are social clubs that are now state sanctioned by way of fraudulent evidence used to gain that 'recognition'.

If one looks deeper and closely one can discern the lies and deceptions going on within Vermont's so called "Native American" "Tribes" and their memberships. If one studies these people's genealogies, one can discern the fallacies of their concocted "I'm-an-Abenaki" stories, just like I did with the above photograph.
I took the time to do the research....

Apparently Vermont did not want to take the time to do the research on these people, their inc.'d organizations, nor their actual genealogies.....

So I will take the time to do the research.....on the Vermont's newly sanctioned and "recognized" "tribes."

In the meantime, these Abenaki Identity Thieves will continue to lie and deceive, and they will promote themselves to naive tourists coming into Vermont, who don't know any better. 

They will reach into your children's heads, in classroom promotion of Title V or VI or VII, naive as little children are, will grow up believing in the lies and deceptions of these liars and deceivers against the Abenakis. 

Vermont gets what it pays for: Lies, Deception, and Fraud.   

Ask two questions of the contemporaneous "Abenaki" self-identifiers:

WHAT COMMUNITY DO YOU COME FROM?

If they say El-nu.... know that they created themselves as a Woodland Re-Enactor Group and were part of Tolba, Inc. [read about it here on this blog]

If they say Nulhegan.... know that they created themselves [ca. 2004] out of the Indian-ist organization of the Clan of the Hawk, Inc. which Dr. Frederick M. Wiseman claims is an Indian-ist organization, and not really a Tribe. [read about it here on this blog]

If they say Missisquoi or Swanton, Vermont.... know that they created themselves in ca. 1975 as well by way of Ronald Canns, son of the late Julius Canns, that began advocating and promoting for Homer, State Recognition the minute he got into the Legislature in 1992, nary once indicating that it was his own son Ronnie that started the whole Missisquoi "Abenaki" nonsense, coming from New Hampshire in 1974, by way of the Boston Indian Council in Massachusetts, doing census through the Man Power Office.

And let's re-read the BIA Reports shall we, while we're at it [of which are posted on this blog]

If they say Koasek... again CREATED as a 501(c)3 non-profit entity within the State, under State Laws, within the Secretary of State's Office as an INCORPORATION 

And all of these groups simply derive their so-called "rich cultural heritage" from books, and people outside the State of Vermont. I can cite numerously example after example of this. 

The songs from from OUTSIDE Vermont. Anyone can buy a tape or CD, and mimic ...
Regalia's can be copied from what is seen worn at any OUTSIDE Pow-wow at Kahnawa:ke, Odanak, or elsewhere.

The Circle of Youth up in Swanton derives from the Lakota.

The Language derives from Cecile Wawanolette and her adopted son Elie Joubert (Odanak), as does the Abenaki Dances.

The mound gardening the Nulhegan profess to have been doing for generations and generations are mimic'd from a book regarding Maine Indian People's!

The Four Indians in Alburg were not correctly identified by Dr. Frederick M. Wiseman Ph.D. (but of course he knew this, as did others descended from the Partlow family) nor his "Abenaki" compatriots either. Those 4 men mentioned in the Alburg Town Records were MOHAWKS from Akwesas:ne. [that can be reviewed in this blog as well as elsewhere]. The same with the misidentification of Antoine Phillips.  He was not Sr. but rather Jr. in the photographic image coming from Mary Kinville. One can discern this from his clothing, worn in that picture!

And on and on it is proven, document by document, that these people who claim to be "Tribes" in Vermont, of "Abenakis" are not who they claim to be or imply their ancestors were. 

The lying and deceiving politicians within Vermont and New Hampshire, right along with the grave robbing and disturbing Archaeologists and Ethnologists have allied with the lying and deceiving "Abenaki" Identity and Cultural Thieves.

Vermont Tourists BE AWARE.

Then again, one gets what they pay for; but in that process ... what does one really help promote?

Genocide? Identity Theft? Cultural Appropriation?

It's not just a Cherokee or Blackfoot problem or dynamic.....

Vermont and New Hampshire have a reality of the "Emperor's New Clothes" in regards to these "Abenaki" "tribes" and the State's population seemingly doesn't see this reality, or simply just doesn't care?

Search This Blog