Charles Francis True Jr's "Tribal Vision Statement" of the Abenaki Nation of New Hampshire, D.B.A.

Documents 01 through 04:  The "Abenaki Indian Center" of Manchester, New Hampshire was a Inc. Organization that was set up by "Chief" Homer St. Francis, Sr. through his "agent" Alan J. Martel of Manchester, New Hampshire on October 04, 1994. Marci L. Martel of 436 Kennard Road in Manchester, N.H. 03491; Alan J. Martel of the same address; Linda L. Robertson of R.R. #1, Box 1C-1 in Canaan, N.H. 03741; Nancy D. Goldsmith of 164 Conant Street in Manchester, N.H. 03102;

Cynthia J. Jansen of 166 Conant Street in Manchester, N.H. 03102 all signed the Articles of Association on October 04, 1994. I have written about this Alan J. Martel, Charles Francis True, Jr, and Sherry Gould of Bradford, N.H. before previously in this blog.

Link: http://reinventedvermontabenaki.blogspot.com/2009/06/february-1995-newsletter-and-happenings.html

LINK: http://reinventedvermontabenaki.blogspot.com/2009/11/documents-where-charles-f-true-jr.html

Document 05 through 09: Dissolution of "Abenaki Indian Center, Inc." signed by Linda Robertson (President); Marci L. Martel (Treasurer); and Mariane Whitman (Secretary) on October 23, 1998.

Some of these documents are re postings on this blog. My point is that these Incorporated groups claiming to represent the Abenaki People's in Vermont and or New Hampshire are NOT from the HISTORICAL Abenaki Tribe's or Communities.

The ONLY legitimate historical, continuous, cohesive Abenaki Tribes/ Communities are Odanak and Wolinak today. Just because Rhonda Lou (nee: Besaw) True, Charles Francis True Jr. are photographically displayed up in those legitimate Abenaki Communities is because they happened to be photographed in their "regalia" coming in the doorway of the Museum up there, when the remodeling was done, and there was a Grand Opening! It wasn't because either of them was or is recognized by that Abenaki Community as being legitimately documented genealogical descendants of the Abenaki!

IF these Incorporated groups of person's claiming to represent the "Historic Abenaki Communities" here in Vermont and New Hampshire, then WHY is it that no one has publicly known of these Inc. President's Chief's/Speaker's BEFORE their "incorporating" with the State of Vermont or New Hampshire? THINK ABOUT IT.

Nancy Millette Doucet stated in her petition to have HB1610 "revised" to suit her, to benefit her, and to weasel April St. Francis-Merrill of that group calling itself the St. Francis/Sokoki Abenaki" a.k.a. ASHAI, Inc. up in Swanton ~right along with all the rest of the incorporated "groups" in Vermont as well, into gaining official Vermont and New Hampshire State Recognition by claiming that they are all from the "Historic Abenaki Tribes."

Yet does the Legislature of either Vermont or New Hampshire even comprehend the genealogical backgrounds of these Inc. President's/"Chief's/Speaker's of these alleged and re-invented Abenaki "groups"?! Do they know that these "groups" may very well be fake, fraudulent, and untruthful in what they have proclaimed, stated, and said throughout the years since 1976?! Has anyone in the Legislature's bothered to even read the B.I.A. Petition for Recognition of the St. Francis/Sokoki Abenaki Band, and the conclusion the B.I.A. made due to the LACK OF EVIDENCE/ DOCUMENTATION/GENEALOGICAL CONNECTION to identify that anyone in this "group" up in Swanton was even "Indian." let along "Abenaki"?!

Perhaps the Legislative Representatives in both Vermont and or New Hampshire ought to read the Bureau of Indian Affairs conclusionary report on the Swanton, Vermont "group" led by April St. Francis-Merrill and realize that when her side-kick Nancy Doucet claims that the St. Francis/Sokoki Abenaki Band up in Swanton, Vermont is from the Historical Missisquoi Abenaki Community, the B.I.A. found it to be a hysterical delusion to be be blunt about it.

Nancy Doucet, Brian Chenevert, Paul Pouliot and the rest of them can claim that their incorporated groups, are from the Historical Abenaki Tribes within Vermont and or New Hampshire (and Massachusetts for that matter or anywhere else they have "incorporated" or have a "trade name"), and they can rob and pilfer the Museums and Colleges such as Dartmouth, pointing fingers at "historically recorded documents and maps" of the Abenaki, etc. YET, where is these "group's" chief's and their members genealogical evidence that they even connect ancestrally to these Abenaki Historical Communities?!

I find it all so h-y-s-t-e-r-i-c-a-l, not historical.

Milo Paquin a.k.a. "Wolfheart Spirit's" Email of January 08, 2010 ~ Mark William Mitchell's Email of January 09, 2010 ~ And A Wee Bit Of Photographic Pondering On The Side, Etc.:

Document 01: For Your Info.....Friday, January 8, 2010 12:21 PM

From: "Wolfheart Spirit"

To: douglaslloydbuchholz@yahoo.com

Jan. 8th, 2010. Please be advised as of this date, I & My Family, know longer belong to any Abenaki Tribal Band. (Abenaki? Tribal? Band?) I find it very upsetting to see My Families personal information posted on line. (Actually this same information, aside from the Card Numbers, and the "Indian Names" can be obtained PUBLICLY through MOST Internet Search Engines and or Ancestry.com, so such alleged "personal information" posted online is ALREADY PUBLC information and in the PUBLIC DOMAIN.

The stress just (allegedly) magnifies my  health condition, So We decided to (allegedly)resign. (Isn't such "resignation" by Milo Paquin ever so convenient!)
There is no animosity or anger towards anyone!
Family members (allegedly) resigning:
Mary-Rose Crane deceased
Milo Paquin
Dana Paquin
Brian Paquin
Kevin Paquin
Thank You Milo Paquin aka Wolfheart Spirit
Anyone care to do a "search" in the upper left corner of my blog here regarding "Wolfheart Spirit" and how she conducted herself when I retrospectively addressed both Jeanne Kent and Nancy Doucet?! How "convenient" that when this "list" of Nancy Millette Doucet's made up "Abenaki Community" is revealed, in who she really represents, Milo Paquin flies the coop, afraid of the Fox and that the Sky is falling! 

Document 02:

lastest posting on blog

Saturday, January 9, 2010 2:46 PM

From: This sender is DomainKeys verified"vcnaa" vcnaa@earthlink.net

To: douglaslloydbuchholz@yahoo.com

Welcome to the new year as one can only hope for a better beginning than the ending of 2009.

Band # 619 - Thought I would update yoU on this e-mail as I had never submitted an application and/or genealogy to Nancy Millette Doucet or Brian Chenevert
Be well
-----Original Message-----
From: Chief Brian Chenevert [mailto:chiefchenevert@cowasuckabenaki.org]
Sent: Friday, October 05, 2007 10:44 AM
To: mitchell@becket.org
Subject: Enrollment Status
Kwai Kwai Mr. Mark Mitchell,
Upon review of our records and our Tribal Rolls we note that you have yet to submit the appropriate application and genealogy needed to be a Citizen of the Koasek Traditional Band.
At this time we have removed you from our Tribal Rolls. At anytime in the future should you submit the appropriate Application for Citizenship along with your family genealogy we would be happy to review it.
Good luck in your future endevours.
Sincererly,
Chief Brian Chenevert
Koasek Traditional Band Of The Abenaki Nation
http://www.cowasuckabenaki.org/

Having received this email from Mark W. Mitchell on January 09, 2010, his words and email(s) do not unmove or sway my thinking/conclusions, by his proclamation/ declaration, that he allegedly NEVER SUBMITTED a Membership / Citizenship Application to this "group" led by "Co-Chiefs" Nancy Millette Doucet and Brian Chenevert. Mark Mitchell was given a Membership Card by Nancy Millette Doucet at-some-point-in-the-retrospective-past, just as "Rick" Hunt recieved a Koasek Membership Card (whether they petitioned for one or not, whether or not they submitted genealogical evidence to their connection(s) to an alleged Abenaki ancestor or Abenaki Historical Community or not). The FACT remains that 1. either Mark W. Mitchell is being untruthful in his words, in this email to my person, and or 2. Nancy Millette Doucet was being untruthful, in who actually was or is in "her alleged and re-invented Koasek/ Cowasuck group". Either way, it doesn't look good, and it smells rotten, whatever has been and is going on! Perhaps, it is both Nancy Millette and Mark Mitchell who both have been untruthful (?). I do not trust what either one of them in what either of them say or do.

Document 03: The Koasek Abenaki Nation and the White Pine Association has worked hard in the long road of recognition for our Abenaki Artists and Crafts People. Here Nancy Millette Doucet meets with Governor Jim Douglas and friends to discuss additions (Amendments) to be made to Bill S.117

Left to Right: Suzanne Young, Governors Legal Advisor; Suzy Chaffee, World Olympic Champion; Jim Douglas,Vermont Governor; Nancy Millette Doucet; Mark Mitchell, Vermont Commissioner Chairman on Native American Affairs; Rick Chaffee, World Olympic Champion.

Document 04: Mark William Mitchell - Nancy Lee (nee: Millette) Doucet - Jesse James Larocque. Date May 03, 2006 in Montpelier, Vermont at the Vermont State House.

Document 05: Nancy (nee: Millette) Doucet receiving a thankful hug from her mutual ally, April Ann (nee: St. Francis) Rushlow - Merrill on May 03, 2006. The Eagle Feather herein being passed from the possession of Nancy Millette Doucet's into the possession of April St. Francis- Merrill and this feather was allegedly obtained by Nancy Millette-Cruger-Lyons-Doucet,(according to Howard Lyons himself) when Nancy had retrospectively taken the Eagle Feathers from a Kahsto:'wah of which was made and belonged to Howard Lyons, her former husband, after their seperation/divorce. Regardless, neither Nancy (nee: Millette) Doucet nor April St. Francis-Merrill are Federally Recognized by the Sec. of Interior (B.I.A.) and both were in illegal possession of an endangered species against the Migratory Bird Act nor was or are either of them, an acknowleged/recognized Spiritual Elder of any Abenaki or Native Community, for either of them to be in possession of such sacred items, let alone legally qualified or spiritually so, to be giving such items to someone else. Why Nancy Millette Doucet and or April St. Francis-Merrill were not arrested and prosecuted at the time under the U.S. Laws as aforementioned, will have to be answered by another.

                 The photographic evidence is starring everyone in the face!

Then again, maybe the feather was from a vulture!

Document 06: Nancy Lee (nee: Millette) Cruger - Lyons - Doucet, Patricia "Patsy" (nee: Partlow) St. Francis (widow of "Chief" "Grand Chief" "High Hereditary Chief" Homer Walter St. Francis) and April Ann (nee: St. Francis) Rushlow - Merrill (Homer and Patsy's daughter). Photograph also taken on May 03, 2006 when Vermont Governor Jim Douglas signed the Legislative Bill S.117 regarding Abenaki Recognition on the steps of the Vermont State House Building in Montpelier, Vermont.

SO, looking at and reviewing these photographs and this

LINK: http://reinventedvermontabenaki.blogspot.com/2009_06_16_archive.html

what does one discern about the "relationship(s)" and or "interaction(s)" between Nancy Millette Doucet and Brian Chenevert with Mark William Mitchell, and vs. versa?

According to the website, "Koasek Traditional Abenaki Band" it states that, "... A graduate of Daniel Webster College, Mark Mitchell is a former member of the Governor's Commission on Native American Affairs and former Executive Director of the Abenaki Self Help Association, Inc., where he developed and implemented programs for education, employment, economic development, youth, substance abuse and housing."

So Mark W. Mitchell was very much involved with the late "Chief" Homer St. Francis group calling itself the "St. Francis/Sokoki Abenaki Band" of Swanton, Vermont ~ and subsequently with Homer's daughter, April St. Francis-Merrill (who became the so-called "Chief" after her fathers death in 2001).

So let's get this straight ... from May 03nd, 2006 (if not before that time-frame) Mark W. Mitchell until October 05, 2007 at 10:44 a.m (when "Koasek Chief" Brian Chenevert allegedly "reviewed their records and their so-called "Tribal Rolls they noted that Mark Mitchell had yet to submit the appropriate application and genealogy needed to be a Citizen of the Koasek Traditional Band, Incorporated. At this time -of October 05, 2007- they had removed Mark Mitchell from their "Tribal Rolls") Mark W. Mitchell was a Card Holding Member/Supporter and was a part of Nancy Millette (Doucet)'s "Koasek group," of which he claimed that "he gave the Card back to Nancy Millette" (just as Todd Hebert also claimed to have done). Yet, in early March of 2008 it was discovered that VCNAA Chairman Mark W. Mitchell spoke on Feb. 28, 2008 "with one side of his tongue" stating, "that this Commission on Native American Affairs, does not support ANY other crafted or revised Amendment to Bill S.117 regarding Abenaki Recognition by the State of Vermont, OTHER THAN the Draft Bill that the VCNAA Members had worked on. Yet, at that same time, it was Mark W. Mitchell who "spoke on the other side of his tongue," helping to create and draft a seperate/different/altered version of an Amendment version to Bill S. 117, which Nancy Millette (Doucet) was speaking to Senator Vincent Illuzzi Republican representative of Essex - Orleans County, Vermont) about on her cell phone in the hallway outside the very room that Chairman Mark Mitchell (and we all) sat in on February 28, 2008! Unbeknownst to everyone on that Commission, it was VCNAA Chairman Mark Mitchell, who was in COLLUSION with April St. Francis-Merrill (St. Francis/Sokoki group/Abenaki Self Help, Inc.) and Nancy Millette (Doucet) (Koasesk Traditional Band of the Koas Abenaki Nation, Trade Name and the White Pine Association, Trade Name) concerning an Abenaki Recognition Amendment Bill version that would have been "just for April Merrill and Nancy Millette's two groups" (if my memory serves me correctly...I have the documents here somewhere ... that Luke Willard of the Nulhegan - Coosuk Band, Inc. and the "El-Nu Abenaki Tribe" joined with Nancy and April in their "cooked up" so-called "Abenaki Alliance" as well creating their so-called "Abenaki Alliance"), were attempting to gain "Instant Shake and Bake" Direct-Official-State-Recognition from the Legislature through the Commission on Native American Affairs, WITHOUT any genealogical, social or historical evidence connecting themselves nor any of their citizens/members/ followers/supporters to the legitimately documented Historical Abenaki Communities, having to be submitted to anyone. Matter of FACT, in the Vermont media, these "groups" led by Nancy Millette, April Merrill and Luke Willard, they all met at Todd Hebert's "Museum" and protested, whined, cried and threw a Temper Tantrum over having to submit ANY genealogical evidence at all to support their connection to a Historical Abenaki Community!

Did Brian Chenevert/ Howard F. Knight, Jr./ Nancy Millette-Cruger-Lyons-Doucet falsely create a "list" of "citizens/members/followers/supporters" of their Cowasuck of North America, Inc./ Koasek Traditional Band of the Sovereign Abenaki Nation, Inc. , which was "incorporated" on May 02, 2006 ... the day before Vermont's Bill S.117 "Abenaki Recognition" was due to be signed by Governor Jim Douglas?!

THINK ABOUT IT.

Either way one cuts this, draws it, lines it up or tries to work this out... the math comes out the same. Someone or all of these people were and are continuing to be dishonest, deceitful, manipulative and not telling the truth of their words and or their actions ... past-tense or present-tense.

Now these "groups" want to proclaim that they are from the Historic Abenaki Tribes in January 2010 and these Inc.'d "groups" in Vermont and N.H. subsequently are DEMANDING instant direct unquestionable Official State of Vermont and or New Hampshire "State Recognition" of their SPECIFIC Inc.'d groups.

Yet where is there SHOWN and PROVIDED the actual genealogical, historical, social history documentary evidence to back up their groups claims. If one looks at and reviews the actual genealogical evidence (as I have been doing and compiling over the years) of these self-proclaiming and self-promoting "Chief's" and or their citizens/members/Card holders, of these alleged and re-invented Abenaki "groups" here in New Hampshire and in Vermont, one will quickly see the Wolves in the Sheep's clothing!

Indian Arts and Crafts Board 25 CFR Part 309 RIN 1067-AE16 Protection of Products of Indian Art and Craftsmanship/ Agency: Indian Arts and Crafts Board (IACB) Department of Interior:

Again, since Nancy Millette - Doucet has retrospectively-speaking made mention of the Federal Indian Arts and Crafts Law. I have subsequently placed on this blog postings of recent, the very exact documentation she attached to emails she herself, sent to New Hampshire and Vermont Legistlative representatives in December 2009.

United Nations Declaration On The Rights of Indigenous Peoples October 02, 2007:

Since Nancy (Millette) Doucet made mention of this document, I concluded let everyone read it, and make their own conclusions and decide the merits of "Chief" Nancy Milette Doucet.

Nancy Millette Doucet Northcountry News Article Pages 13 and 14:

Document 01 and 02: Northcountry News Page 13 and 14. Dated October 30, 2009. Entitled "National Geographic Study In The Koas Area of Haverhill And Newbury"

The National Geography DNA scientist came to North Haverhill in March as a partnership program with the local White Pine Association to help people in the region find their roots. Many people in the region had family oral history and some had family bibles but because of the way US Census were performed in the past few could find any paperwork to prove their Native American genealogy. The White Pine Association wanted to help people who had been living in the region for generations to have another tool to help with the genealogy research so the board of directors contacted Dr. Schurr who has been working with Indigenous Groups worldwide. About 200 people took part in the study.

"It has taken a few months to get all of the results studied and ready to post online but now the National Geographic site is starting to post the findings," stated the White Pine Association. On the day of testing the scientists gave each person a packet of papers that had their own identification number on them. For those who did the testing all you will do is go to https://genographic.nationalgeographic.com/genographic/journey.html

and type in your number to see if your results are done and posted. If they are not up yet keep checking back. They are working on this as you reed this."

"We are very excited about some of the results so far," stated nancy Millette Doucet, Executive Director of the White Pine Association. "The DNA rests have proven a very rare strain of Aboriginal line in my family and other community members of this region. This is very exciting news and we look forward to working with National Geographic on this project." One of the issues making this strain rare is it is entirely absent from East Asian markers. This strain is found in North America and is found in the Algonquian, Sioux, Navajo and other Native groups. "This is very exciting and we are so glad we are able now to have another tool in preserving and honoring the important history of the Koas meadows of Haverhill and Newbury and the people here," said the Whie Pine Board members. The White Pine Association is also working on a curriculum for the local schools to present day. The WPA is projecting the project will be complete in time for November 2009 Native American Month.

For more information please visit the White Pine Association Website at http://www.whitepineassociation.org/ 

WHITE PINE ASSOCIATE FOCUSES ON ABENAKI LANGUAGE PRESERVATION Article Date: August 28, 2008. "We are very excited and grateful for this opportunity,” said Trustees of the White Pine Association. The board trustees members include: Nancy Millette (Doucet) , Peggy Fullerton, John Prescott, Colleen Chase, Dr. Ray Lussier and Mike Fenn. All members with the exception of Dr Ray Lussier where born and raised in the Haverhill / Newbury area. "The Abenaki Alliance" is made up of the Koasek (Brian Chenevert/Howard Knight Jr/ Nancy Millette Doucet Inc.) , Nulhegan (Luke Willard and Dawn Macie Inc.), Missiquoi/ Sokoki (April St. Francis-Merrill Inc.) and El Nu Abenaki (Roger Longtoe - Koasek "Sub-Band" now calling itself the El-Nu Abenaki Tribe) Nations and spans the whole state of Vermont and parts of New Hampshire. The White Pine is centered in the heart of the historical Koas Meadows of Newbury and Haverhill which was historically the home of the Mission des loups built around 1675 by Jesuit Joseph Aubrey.

STUDY AND RESEARCH THIS LINK WITHIN THIS BLOG:

LINK: http://reinventedvermontabenaki.blogspot.com/2009/10/nancy-nee-millette-doucet-and-her.html

READ THE DOCUMENTS!

Nancy Lee nee: Millette - Doucet

DOES NOT NOR CAN SHE PROVE DOCUMENTARILY OR OTHERWISE THAT HER ANCESTOR(S) DESCEND FROM ANY NATIVE PERSON FROM ANY HISTORIC TRIBAL COMMUNITY, BAND OR GROUP OF ABENAKI, COWASUCK OR ANY OTHER KNOWN DOCUMENTED NATIVE AMERICAN!!!

D-N-A CAN NOT PROVE A DAMNED THING!

IT DOES NOT IDENTIFY

NATIVE COMMUNITY

NATIVE ANCESTRY

NATIVE DESCENT

NATIVE LANGUAGE

NATIVE HERITAGE

NATIVE CULTURE

AND IT SURE DOES NOT MAKE ANY PERSON

ABENAKI OR NATIVE AMERICAN!

Document 03 and 04: Nancy Millette Doucet on December 13, 2008 (after being "thrown" out of the Brian Chenevert/ Howard F. Knight Jr. "group" calling itself the "Koasek Traditional Abenaki Band" in the Fall of 2008 ... I have the email communications from that time-frame between those persons ... including Nancy Millette Doucet's communication's to and from various persons). This Koasek Traditional band of the Koas Abenaki Nation is MERELY A D.B.A. Tradename of Nancy Millette Doucet's creation in VERMONT via the Vermont Secretary of the State Office, along with John Prescott 162 Evergreen Drive in Newbury, Vermont 05051 and Shirley Hook of 1888 Allen Bent Road in Braintree, Vermont 05669.

NOTICE that Nulhegan Band of the Coosuck Abenaki People, Inc. at P.O. Box 1251 in Derby Line, Vermont 05830 - Nancy Millette at 284 Messier Rd in Randolph, Vermont 05051 and Luke Willard at P.O. Box 1251 in Derby Line Vermont 05830 is crossed out on this document. Thats what I call C-O-L-L-U-S-I-O-N !!

THESE PEOPLE DO NOT COME FROM ANY HISTORIC ABENAKI TRIBE(S)!

THEY ARE MERELY DOING BUSINESS UNDER THEIR OWN CREATED TRADNAMES

"DOING-BUSINESS-AS"

AND OR

INCORPORATIONS

THAT THEY THEMSELVES HAVE CREATED!

Document 05: Nancy Doucet's TRADE NAME (DOING BUSINESS AS/ D.B.A.) dated January 02, 2009 at "Principle Office Address" of 2997 Dartmouth College Highway in North Haverhill, New Hampshire 03774. Mailing Address: P.O. Box 37 Haverhill, N.H. 03765.

December 30, 2009 Email From Nancy L. Millette Doucet To N.H. Legislative Representive's:

FW: Bill 1610 new markup suggestion laws attached

From: N.H. Representative

Saturday, January 9, 2010 1:38 PM

To: douglaslloydbuchholz@yahoo.com

Message contains attachments 3 Files (242KB)

Download Allmark up of nh bill1610.docxArts and craft law.pdfindgrights.pdf

-----Original Message-----
From: nmillettedoucet [mailto:nmillette@roadrunner.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 30, 2009 8:44 AM
To: mathesonbob@msn.com; ingbretson_studio@yahoo.com; Edmond Gionet; john.gallus@leg.state.nh.us; jim.aguiar@leg.state.nh.us; friedgreen2000@yahoo.com; blbenn@valley.net; sharon.nordgren@valley.net; beatriz.pastor@leg.state.nh.us; david.pierce@leg.state.nh.us; susan.almy@comcast.net; frank.gould@leg.state.nh.us; lharding@valley.net; andrew.white@leg.state.nh.us; Laliberte, Suzanne; matthew.houde@leg.state.nh.us; chuck.townsend@leg.state.nh.us; cmulholland134@gmail.com; margie@maybeck.com; phil.preston@leg.state.nh.us; prharvey@comcast.net; r.mack2@rcn.com; g_shattuck@mcttelecom.com; harold.janeway@leg.state.nh.us; peggy.gilmour@leg.state.nh.us; bette.lasky@leg.state.nh.us; michael.downing@leg.state.nh.us; info@joinshaun.com; jordan.ulery@leg.state.nh.us; john.knowles@leg.state.nh.us; rgboehm@comcast.net; laura.gandia@leg.state.nh.us; bobhaefnerjp@comcast.net; andrew.renzullo@leg.state.nh.us; cgargasz@cs.com; dryder2706@aol.com; jshafham@gmail.com; anne-marie.irwin@leg.state.nh.us; peter.bragdon@leg.state.nh.us; john.cebrowski@leg.state.nh.us; khawkins2@comcast.net; ed.moran@leg.state.nh.us; jspaulding4staterep@gmail.com; moeville@peoplepc.com; sheila.roberge@leg.state.nh.us; calvin.pratt@leg.state.nh.us; ripholden@msn.com; rcday2@comcast.net; weblakes@metrocast.net; dreed1@msn.com; leigh.webb@leg.state.nh.us; martha.fullerclark@leg.state.nh.us; bob.odell@leg.state.nh.us; jim.mcclammer@leg.state.nh.us; rh.rowe@comcast.net; spalmer_peanuts@msn.com; amherstrep@gmail.com; bevalyn.merrick@leg.state.nh.us; etsi.devries@leg.state.nh.us; D'Allesandro, Lou; honhdr@yahoo.com; wremick@ne.rr.com; ingyp@earthlink.net; Rick Ladd

Cc: Raymond S. Burton; Carr, Daniel; Rick Ladd; Christiansen, Lars; mbaldasaro@comcast.net; Chininis, Alexis; Katsiantonis, George; Fields, Dennis; thomaskatsiantonis@gmail.com; kris-e-roberts@live.com; Smith, Todd; Emiro, Frank; Twombly, James; JAMES; Hardy, Valerie; Sweeney, Cynthia; Domingo, Baldwin; Hutz, Sarah; Garrity, Patrick; Rollo, Michael; Boisvert, Richard A; Susan Ford; Laliberte, Suzanne; Clarke, Claire; Lindsey, Steven; Charron, Gene; Watters, David; Cushing, Renny; Van McLeod; Reynolds, Deborah

Subject: Fw: Bill 1610 new markup suggestion laws attached
We would agree to these changes if you would re draft this bill to include this I would be glad to pass it to the other Historic Abenaki Leaders to see if they would approve it. Please keep in mind Indian Arts and Craft need to be removed. There is no way to help the Indian Artist in any state without full recognition given to HISTORIC tribes. I suggest you just strike that out and please view the laws before including Indian Arts issues, burial ground issues etc. Please understand that I am only trying to help you. We have dealt with these mis-intrupted laws by State authorities for years and have worked tiredless with States and Federal Law makers.
Thank you
Chief Nancy Millette Doucet

Blue= Strike out

Red= Additions/ changes

HB 1610-FN – AS INTRODUCED
2010 SESSION
10-2489
05/03
HOUSE BILL 1610-FN
AN ACT establishing a New Hampshire commission on Native American affairs and recognizing the Historic Abenaki Tribes and other American Indian residents as a minority population in the state of New Hampshire.
SPONSORS: Rep. Carr, Ches 4; Rep. Cushing, Rock 15; Rep. Watters, Straf 4; Rep. Charron, Rock 7; Rep. Lindsey, Ches 3; Sen. Fuller Clark, Dist 24; Sen. Kelly, Dist 10
COMMITTEE: State-Federal Relations and Veterans Affairs
ANALYSIS
This bill establishes a New Hampshire commission on Native American affairs. The bill also recognizes the Abenaki people and other American Indian residents as a minority population in the state of New Hampshire.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Explanation: Matter added to current law appears in bold italics.
Matter removed from current law appears [in brackets and struckthrough.]
Matter which is either (a) all new or (b) repealed and reenacted appears in regular type.
10-2489
05/03
STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
In the Year of Our Lord Two Thousand Ten
AN ACT establishing a New Hampshire commission on Native American affairs and recognizing the Historic Abenaki Nations and other American Indian residents as a minority population in the state of New Hampshire.
Be it Enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives in General Court convened:
1 New Subdivision; Department of Cultural Resources; New Hampshire Commission on Native American Affairs. Amend RSA 21-K by inserting after section 23 the following new subdivision:
New Hampshire Commission on Native American Affairs
21-K:24 New Hampshire Commission on Native American Affairs Established.
I. In order to recognize the historic and cultural contributions of Native Americans to New Hampshire, to protect and strengthen their own heritage, and to address their needs in state policy, programs, and actions, there is hereby established the New Hampshire commission on Native American affairs.
II. The commission shall consist of 7 members who are residents of New Hampshire and Native American community leaders representing the diversity of the states’ American Indian population. The governor and Executive Council shall appoint the initial members from a list of 15 candidates compiled by the New Hampshire Intertribal Native American Council on behalf of American Indian groups within the state NH Historic Resources, Commissioner of Cultural Affairs. Thereafter, the governor and Executive Council shall appoint members based on recommendations submitted by the commission. The Native American commission shall be nonpartisan. Each member of the commission shall serve a 3-year term, and no member shall serve more than 2 consecutive terms. Initial appointments by the governor and Executive Council shall be for staggered terms of one, 2, or 3 years.
III. The commission shall be vested with the authority to:
(a) Address issues common to Native Americans and persons of Native American descent who are residing in this state.
(b) Promote and protect Native American arts in New Hampshire. This is moot according to Federal Law.
(c) Develop guidelines and policies to assist state agencies with state and federal laws pertaining to Indian affairs, such as:
(1) Preservation and protection of Native American artifacts and burial grounds under Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act of 1990, P.L. 101-601.
(2) The Indian Child Welfare Act of 1978, 25 U.S.C., section 1902 et seq.
(3) The Indian Arts and Crafts Act of 1990, P.L. 101-644.
(d) Assist Native American tribal councils, organizations, and individuals to:
(1) Secure social services, education, employment opportunities, health care, housing, and census information.
(2) Permit the creation, display, and sale of Native American arts and crafts to legally label them as Indian- or Native American-produced, as provided in 18 U.S.C. section 1159(c)(3)(B) and 25 U.S.C. section 305e(d)(2). This is an illegal act. The State would have to give Full State Recognition to HISTORIC ABENAKI TRIBES in order to comply with this. This should be a strike out section.
(3) Receive assistance and support from the federal Indian Arts and Crafts Board, as provided in 25 U.S.C. section 305 et seq. The Historic Tribes would need full state recognition.
(4) Establish eligibility for federal assistance with educational, housing, and cultural opportunities.
(5) Establish and/or continue programs offered through the U.S. Department of Education Office on Indian Education pursuant to Title VII of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act established in 1972 to support educational and cultural efforts of tribal entities that have been either state or federally recognized. Historic Tribes would need FULL State Recognition.
IV. The commission shall meet at least 4 times a year and at any other times at the request of the chairperson. The chairperson of the commission shall be elected by a majority vote of the commission members. More meetings asked by any member of the commission and the commissioner should be appointed by Governor and Executive Council on recommendation from Cultural Resources and NH Historic Preservation.
V. The commission is authorized to accept any gifts, grants, or donations from any public or private source, provided that such gifts, grants, or donations shall be used exclusively to advance the commission’s purpose and duties. Members of the commission shall serve without compensation. Gifts can cause conflict of interest. No gifts, grants or donations. The Commission is in place to only assist Natives in the State.
VI. Beginning November 1, 2011, and each year thereafter, the commission shall submit an annual report of its activities, findings, and recommendations to the governor, the speaker of the house of representatives, the senate president, the commissioner of the department of cultural resources, and the state library. Quarterly reports should be given to Department of Cultural Resources and annual to all other
VII. The commission shall be administratively attached to the department of cultural resources.
2 Recognition of Abenaki People.
I. The state of New Hampshire recognizes the Abenaki people and recognizes all Native American people who reside in New Hampshire as a minority population.
II. Recognition of the Native American or Abenaki people provided in paragraph I shall be for the sole purposes specified in section 1 of this act and shall not be interpreted to provide any Native American or Abenaki person with any other special rights or privileges that the state does not confer on or grant to other state residents. Abenaki People needs to be defined. Who is Abenaki? How do you decide who is Abenaki and who is not? According to United Nations Declaration of Indigenous People and Human Rights this is decided by Tribes not commissions or state departments. The Historic Abenaki Bands need to be defined here in order to comply with this. Indian Tribes are defined by a historic presence from contact time to present by regional connection to a land base and have a chief, tribal council, elder’s council and can show historic connection to community as well as present connection. Then only tribes can give citizenship based on their applicant approve to individuals. You need to define exact Abenaki Nations within NH by this standard and write in the names of those tribes.
3 Effective Date. This act shall take effect 60 days after its passage.
LBAO
10-2489
12/10/09
HB 1610-FN - FISCAL NOTE
AN ACT establishing a New Hampshire commission on Native American affairs and recognizing the Historic Abenaki Nations and other American Indian residents as a minority population in the state of New Hampshire.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The Department of Cultural Resources states this bill may increase state restricted revenue by an indeterminable amount in FY 2010 and each year thereafter. There will be no fiscal impact on county and local revenue or on state, county, or local expenditures.
METHODOLOGY:
The Department of Cultural Resources states this bill establishes a New Hampshire commission on Native American affairs. While the commission will be administratively attached to the Department of Cultural Resources, the Department states this will not cause an increase in cost as a result. The bill authorizes the newly established commission to accept any gifts, grants, or donations from any public or private source, provided that such gifts, grants, or donations shall be used exclusively to advance the commission’s purpose and duties. The Department states this authorization may lead to an increase in state restricted revenues in FY 2010 and each year thereafter.

NANCY MILLETTE DOUCET IS DOING THE SAME TATICS SHE DID IN VERMONT REGARDING THE "ABENAKI" RECOGNITION BILLS" IN THAT STATE, THIS TIME IN NEW HAMPSHIRE.

WHY DOES SHE MENTION CHARLES FRANCIS TRUE JR?
(BECAUSE HER RELATIVE RHONDA LOU BESAW - TRUE MARRIED TO HIM, THATS WHY!)

NONE OF THEM CAN GENEALOGICALLY CONNECT THEIR ANCESTORS TO A HISTORICAL ABENAKI/ NATIVE COMMUNITY FROM WITHIN NEW HAMPSHIRE OR VERMONT! AGAIN, THEY ARE ALL MERE INCORPORATIONS THAT THEY THEMSELVES HAVE CREATED!
RESEARCH THIS BLOG'S CONTENT ASAP.

THE ONLY REASON NANCY DOUCET INSISTS, IN HER REVISION OF HB1610 THAT THE EXECUTIVE COUNCIL, NH HISTORIC RESOURCES AND COMMISSIONER OF CULTURAL AFFAIRS BE INVOLVED IN THIS HB1610 BILL IS BECAUSE OF HER RESPECTIVE "CONNECTIONS" WITH RAYMOND BURTON, AND RICHARD A. BOUSIVERT!

January 09, 2010 Email from N.H. Representative Regarding Nancy Lee Millette Doucet And N.H. Bill HB1610:

mark up of nh bill1610.docx Saturday, January 9, 2010 1:41 PM douglaslloydbuchholz@yahoo.com

STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

In the Year of Our Lord Two Thousand Ten
AN ACT establishing a New Hampshire commission on Native American affairs and recognizing the Historic Abenaki Tribes: Koasek Traditional Band of the KOAS, NH Abenaki and all other Historic Abenaki Tribes who’s territory spans the CT River in VT and NH and other American Indian residents as a minority population in the state of New Hampshire.
Be it Enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives in General Court convened:
1 New Subdivision; Department of Cultural Resources; New Hampshire Commission on Native American Affairs. Amend RSA 21-K by inserting after section 23 the following new subdivision:
New Hampshire Commission on Native American Affairs 21-K:24 New Hampshire Commission on Native American Affairs Established.
I. In order to recognize the historic and cultural contributions of Native Americans to New Hampshire, to protect and strengthen their own heritage, and to address their needs in state policy, programs, and actions, there is hereby established the New Hampshire commission on Native American affairs.
II. The commission shall consist of 7 members who are residents of New Hampshire and Native American community leaders representing the diversity of the states' American Indian population.
(The governor shall appoint the initial members from a list of 15 candidates compiled by the New Hampshire Intertribal Native American Council on behalf of American Indian groups within the state.) STRIKE /CHANGE TO: NH Historical Resources, NH Commissioner of Cultuaral Affrairs will compile Native American members to present to the Governor to choose the 7 members commission members.
Thereafter, the governor shall appoint members based on recommendations submitted by (the commission.) STRIKE/ change to: NH Historical Resources, NH Commissioner of Cultuaral Affrairs will compile Native American members to present to the Governor to choose the 7 members commission members.
The Native American commission shall be nonpartisan. Each member of the commission shall serve a 3-year term, and no member shall serve more than 2 consecutive terms. Initial appointments by the governor shall be for staggered terms of one, 2, or 3 years.
III. The commission shall be vested with the authority to:
(a) Address issues common to Native Americans and persons of Native American
descent who are residing in this state.
(b) Promote and protect Native American arts in New Hampshire. This is moot. According to Federal Indian Arts and Craft Laws the only way an artist can claim they are Authentic is if the State or BIA recognizes historic tribes with full state recognition. Paul Pouliot of the Cowasuck Pennacook uses his Incorporation numbers to say he is federal recognized. He also says his number 151 on file with the BIA for a letter of Intent he wrote in 1995 makes him recognized. According to the BIA they have no clue who he is and a petition was never filed because he has no historic standing and would never meet the BIA federal petition for recognition. He has never been granted recognition in MA or Vt where he has tried to get recognized over the years.
BIA DEF For Recognition:
(c) Associations, organizations, corporations or groups of any character that have been formed in recent times may not be acknowledged under these regulations. The fact that a group that meets the criteria in § 83.7 (a) through (g) has recently incorporated or otherwise formalized its existing autonomous political process
The only way NH could possible protect Indian Arts and Crafts is to give state recognition to historically standing tribes in the state who the NH Historic Resources has worked with over the years including: NH Abenaki Charlie True, Koasek Abenaki of the Koas (Haverhill and Newbury) and Maybe NH Intertribal Council (Peter Newell) however that would need to be checked with BIA and Indian Arts and Craft Board. To my knowledge a State has NEVER recognized an Intertribal Council. States recognize HISTORIC tribes.
(c) Develop guidelines and policies to assist state agencies with state and federal laws pertaining to Indian affairs, such as:
(1) Preservation and protection of Native American artifacts and burial grounds under Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act of 1990, P.L. 101-601. NH Historic Resources already does this.
(2) The Indian Child Welfare Act of 1978, 25 U.S.C., section 1902 et seq. This is dangerous. Paul Pouliot ( Cowasuck Pennacook) has on many occasions destroyed families by false claims against families because of his personal grievances with individuals. This part of the bill should only be under the supervision of NH State Child Welfare and Attorney General’s office!
(3) The Indian Arts and Crafts Act of SUMMARY: This rule adopts regulations to carry out Public Law 101-644,
LAWS CONCERNING INDIAN ARTS AND CRAFTS BIA and INDIAN ARTS AND CRAFT BOARD:
the Indian Arts and Crafts Act of 1990. The regulations define the nature and Indian origin of products that the law covers and specify procedures for carrying out the law.
EFFECTIVE DATES: November 20, 1996.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Meridith Z. Stanton or Geoffrey E. Stamm, Indian Arts and Crafts Board, Room 4004-MIB, U.S. Department of the Interior, 1849 C Street, NW., Washington, DC 20240, telephone 202-208-3773 (not a toll-free  call).
1990, P.L. 101-644.
The Indian Arts and Crafts Act of 1990 The Indian Arts and Crafts Act of 1990 (P.L. 101-644) is a truth-in-advertising law that prohibits misrepresentation in marketing of Indian arts and crafts products within the United States. It is illegal to offer or display for sale, or sell any art or craft product in a manner that falsely suggests it is Indian produced, an Indian product, or the product of a particular Indian or Indian Tribe or Indian arts and crafts organization, resident within the United States. For a first time violation of the Act, an individual can face civil or criminal penalties up to a $250,000 fine or a 5-year prison term, or both. If a business violates the Act, it can face civil penalties or can be prosecuted and fined up to $1,000,000.Under the Act, an Indian is defined as a member of any federally or State recognized Indian Tribe, or an individual certified as an Indian artisan by an Indian Tribe.
.R. 725: In dian Arts and Crafts Amendments Act of 2009 Congressional Research Service Summary
The following summary was written by the Congressional Research Service, a well-respected nonpartisan arm of the Library of Congress.
1/27/2009--Introduced.
Indian Arts and Crafts Amendments Act of 2009 - Amends the Indian Arts and Crafts Act of 1990 to: (1) authorize any federal law enforcement officer to conduct an investigation of an offense involving the sale of any good that is misrepresented as an Indian produced good or product that occurs within the jurisdiction of the United States; and (2) authorize the Indian Arts and Crafts Board to refer such an alleged offense to any federal law enforcement officer (currently, just to the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI)) for appropriate investigation. Permits a federal law enforcement officer to investigate such an alleged offense regardless of whether such officer receives a referral from the Board. Requires that the findings of an investigation of such an alleged offense by any federal department or agency be submitted to: (1) a federal or state prosecuting authority; or (2) the Board. Provides for the Board, upon receiving the findings of such an investigation, to: (1) recommend to the Attorney General that criminal proceedings be initiated (current law); and (2) provide such support to the Attorney General relating to the criminal proceedings as the Attorney General determines to be appropriate. Allows the Board, in lieu of, or in addition to, any such criminal proceeding, to recommend that the Attorney General initiate a civil action. Revises: (1) requirements for the initiation of civil actions for misrepresentation of Indian produced goods; and (2) penalties for the misrepresentation of such goods.
(e) Indian tribe means—
(1) Any Indian tribe, band, nation, Alaska Native village, or any organized group or community which is recognized as eligible for the special programs and services provided by the United States to Indians because of their status as Indians; or
(2) Any Indian group that has been formally recognized as an Indian tribe by a State legislature or by a State commission or similar organization legislatively vested with State tribal recognition authority. Sustained contact means the period of earliest sustained non-Indian settlement and/or governmental presence in the local area in which the historical tribe or tribes from which the petitioner descends was located historically
(b) Historical generally refers to programs or lands having a particular history that is relevant to the Tribe. For example, particular trails, forts, significant sites, or educational activities that relate to the history of a particular Tribe.
Definition of ‘‘Indian’’
The term ‘‘Indian’’ and the interrelated term ‘‘Indian Tribe’’ are defined by Congress by statute in the 1990 Act and may not be changed by regulation. As defined by the 1990 Act, however, the terms ‘‘Indian’’ and ‘‘Indian Tribe’’ already include, for purposes of sections 104, 105, and 107 of the 1990 Act, members of Staterecognized Tribes and Alaska Natives, as well as members of federally recognized Tribes.
Sections 104 and 105 of the 1990 Act
define ‘‘Indian’’ and ‘‘Indian Tribe’’ as follows:
‘‘The term ‘Indian’ means any individual who is a member of an Indian tribe, or for the purposes of this section is certified as an Indian artisan by an Indian tribe;’’
‘‘The term ‘Indian tribe’ means—‘‘Any Indian tribe, band, nation, Alaska Native village, or other organized group or community which is recognized as eligible for the special programs and services provided by the United States to Indians because of their status as Indians; or ‘‘Any Indian group that has been formally recognized as an Indian tribe by a State legislature or by a State commission or similar organization legislatively vested with State tribal recognition authority.’’ In response to the comment regarding the sale of art by individuals who are not members of federally or State recognized Tribes, but are of Indian descent, it should be noted that such individuals may market their goods as an Indian, provided they are certified as an ‘‘Indian artisan’’ by an Indian Tribe.
(d) Assist Native American tribal councils, organizations, and individuals to:
(1) Secure social services, education, employment opportunities, health care, housing, and census information. The Historic Tribes already does this (2) Permit the creation, display, and sale of Native American arts and crafts to legally label them as Indian- or Native American-produced, as provided in 18 U.S.C. section 1159(c)(3)(B) and 25 U.S.C. section 305e(d)(2). See above this is NOT legal with out state recognition of Historic Tribes
(3) Receive assistance and support from the federal Indian Arts and Crafts Board, as provided in 25 U.S.C. section 305 et seq. They will only assist if State recognizes Historic Tribes. You should study this and have committee meet with or talk with Indian Arts and Craft Board. Numbers and addresses are listed above
(4) Establish eligibility for federal assistance with educational, housing, and cultural opportunities. Historic Tribes already do this….
(5) Establish and/or continue programs offered through the U.S. Department of Education Office on Indian Education pursuant to Title VII of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act established in 1972 to support educational and cultural efforts of tribal entities that have been either state or federally recognized. Historic tribes already do this.
IV. The commission shall meet at least 4 times a year and at any other times at the request of the chairperson. The chairperson of the commission shall be elected by a majority vote of the commission members.
V. The commission is authorized to accept any gifts, grants, or donations from any public or private source, provided that such gifts, grants, or donations shall be used exclusively to advance the commission's purpose and duties. Members of the commission shall serve without compensation. Commission should NOT be allowed to gain financial help. It is up to the tribes to take care of their people and the commission should only be in place to assist Tribes with project NOT fund anything!
VI. Beginning November 1, 2011, and each year thereafter, the commission shall submit an annual report of its activities, findings, and recommendations to the governor, the speaker of the house of representatives, the senate president, the commissioner of the department of cultural resources, and the state library.
VII. The commission shall be administratively attached to the department of cultural resources.
2 Recognition of Abenaki People.
I. The state of New Hampshire recognizes the Abenaki people and recognizes
all Native American people who reside in New Hampshire as a minority population. Indian People are already a minority. Do not need a bill for this!
II. Recognition of the Native American or Abenaki people provided in paragraph I shall be for the sole purposes specified in section 1 of this act and shall not be interpreted to provide any Native American or Abenaki person with any other special rights or privileges that the state does not confer on or grant to other state residents. What is a definition of ABENAKI? IS that anyone who self proclaims or is that an individual who has NH Historic inherited rights by blood bone to NH? By most definitions it is HISTORICALLLY Located to a region land base from the beginning of time and members are approved by tribal council of that land base region. Just because someone says they are Abenaki doesn’t make them Abenaki with in NH ! Their must be a historic evidence they are and connected to a region landbase with in NH!
3 Effective Date. This act shall take effect 60 days after its passage.
LBAO
10-2489
12/10/09
HB 1610-FN - FISCAL NOTE
AN ACT establishing a New Hampshire commission on Native American affairs
and recognizing the Abenaki and other American Indian residents as a minority population in the state of New Hampshire. STRIKE Indian People are already a minority
FISCAL IMPACT:
The Department of Cultural Resources states this bill may increase state restricted revenue by an indeterminable amount in FY 2010 and each year thereafter. There will be no fiscal impact on county and local revenue or on state, county, or local expenditures. Can not increase states revenue with the federal laws will not uphold this bill!
METHODOLOGY:
The Department of Cultural Resources states this bill establishes a New Hampshire commission on Native American affairs. While the commission will be administratively attached to the Department of Cultural Resources, the Department states this will not cause an increase in cost as a result. The bill authorizes the newly established commission to accept any gifts, grants, or donations from any public or private source, provided that such gifts, grants, or donations shall be used exclusively to advance the
commission's purpose and duties. The Department states this authorization may lead to an increase in state restricted revenues in FY 2010 and each year thereafter.
Finally according to Indian Arts and Craft Laws this bill could end up costing the State of NH and Indian Artists a fortune! In order for this bill to be a legal standing to address concerns mentioned in this bill Historic Tribes or Bands would need to be fully state recognized according to Federal terms stated above.
I hope this helps you. Chief Nancy Millette Doucet

CONCLUSION: Nancy Lee Millette-Cruger-Lyons-Doucet CLEARLY is SUPPORTING her OWN VERSION of HB1610, to BENEFIT her "group"/ family members! Nancy Doucet DOES NOT REPRESENT THE LEGITIMATE HISTORICAL ABENAKI PEOPLES OF NEW HAMPSHIRE.

NO WHERE IN HB1610 AS WRITTEN NOR THE REVISION WRITE-UP BY NANCY DOUCET ... IS THERE ANY REQUIREMENT TO SHOW GENEALOGICAL, SOCIAL, OR HISTORICAL EVIDENCE, THAT THESE "GROUPS" SUCH AS NANCY DOUCET'S, ETC. (HER FAMILY!) DESCEND GENEALOGICALLY FROM A LEGITIMATE ABENAKI COMMUNITY WITHIN VERMONT OR NEW HAMPSHIRE!

NANCY MILLETTE DOUCET MERELY REPRESENTS A CONTEMPORARILY CREATED 501(c)3 NON-PROFIT INCORPORATION CREATED BY HER!

THEY ARE NOT FROM A HISTORIC ABENAKI COMMUNITY!

Howard F. Knight Jr.'s Membership/Card Holders:

Document 01: Howard Franklin Knight Jr.'s Membership/Card Holders as in the Microsoft Exel Viewer document recieved from Eric Scott Floyd on Oct. 22, 2009, after Nancy Millette Doucet sent the same to Eric Scott Floyd on March 11, 2009.
Card Number / Card Holder
500 Blank
501/ Minnie F. Knight
1381/ Franklin W. Knight
A503/ Terri (Doba) Knight
504/ Bobbi Rene Knight
505/ Son 1
506/ Son 2
507/ Sheila Marie Blandin
508/ Son 1 of Sheila
509/ Son 2 of Sheila
A510/ Husband of Sheila
1380/ Matthew R. Knight
A512/ Ana Knight
1379/ Howard F. Knight Jr.
A514/ Tanya Coblai
A515/ Marina Coblai
516/ John W. Davis
A517/ Lorena J. Davis
518/ Arthur L. Davis
519/ Son 2
520/ Son 3
521/ Daughter 1
522/ Daughter 2
523/ Dorothy J. (Davis) Saucier
524/ Child 1
525/ Child 2
526/ Bell L. (Kimbell) Salsman
A527/ Edward Salsman
528/ Chentel M. Salazar
529/ Timothy W. Salazar
530/ Jesse P. Bercegeay
531/ D. Peter Waterman
532/ Virginia (Batchelder) Tortstenson
A533/ Charles Tortstenson
534/ Alice M. Batchelder
535/
536/
537/
538/
439/
540/