https://www.sas.upenn.edu/anthropology/people/bruchac
The Bruchac's narrative doesn't fit the genealogical and genetic research into their Bowman ancestors. So what does this say about their WHITE PRIVILEGE in gaining the positions that they have ... based on their false yet repeatedly perpetuated ancestral narrative?
They are not descendants of the O'Bomsawin's of Odanak ... that they pimped and pushed to the na(t)ive and non-native public for years.
The genetic Y-DNA proves this false ancestral narrative to the reality for what it is. And since that is the reality, what about everything else that Marge Bruchac - Kennick and her brother Joe Burchac has embellished and pawned out there in her or his writings, (or should I say their "historical imagination"!)
This point ALSO APPLIES TO FREDERICK MATTHEW WISEMAN of then-Johnson State College, and many others.
Let's take a look at the reality here:
1. Ots Toch -
married a Dutchman VanSlyck (she was 100% Mohawk Indian woman allegedly)
2. Elizabeth VanSlyck - married a VanBuren so she would
be 50% Mohawk Indian woman
3. Cornelius VanBuren - married a Dutch woman he would be
1/4% Mohawk Indian man
4. Aaltje VanNess VanBuren - she would be 1/8th Mohawk
Indian woman
5. Hendrikje Fonda VanBuren - 1/16th Mohawk Indian woman
(if #1 were full-blood Mohawk)
6. Douwe VanAntwerp - 1/36th
Mohawk Indian
7. Winant Van Antwerp – A drop 1/64th = "Damn near
nothing"
8. Daniel Wynet Van Antwerp - 1/128th = "Tiny
Drop"
9. Alice Van Antwerp - 1/256th - Her was husband Lewis H.
Bowman Sr.
10. Jesse Elmer Bowman - He ain't no Mohawk or an
Abenaki! - 1/512th
11. Marion Flora Bowman - 1/1024th - She swore up and
down she weren't no Indian!
12. Joseph Edward
Bruchac III - 1/2048th - There ain't no NDN drops left!
13. Jesse Bowman
Bruchac - 1/4096th - “Abenaki” based on Beliefs, Theories, and Stories…
So ... what are these Colleges and University's really pimping out there to naive students in their education seeking? Are the University's and Colleges getting on the band wagon of making and pimping FAKE Native "professors" of questionable dubious Native Ancestry and or Status?
You do remember Iron Eyes Cody?
You do remember Ward Churchill?
You do remember Mariella Squire - Hakey?
You do remember Mariella Squire - Hakey?
You do remember Rachel Dolezal?
You do remember Susan Taffe Reed?
You do remember Elizabeth Warren?
You do remember Donna (Carvalho) Charlebois - Moody?
You do remember Donna (Carvalho) Charlebois - Moody?
How about Joseph Edward Bruchac III?
How about Margaret (nee: Bruchac) Kennick?
How about Jesse Bowman Bruchac?
How about James Edward Bruchac?
In conclusion ... about Marge Bruchac and her "tenured fast-track Native American professor" ... it is based on what exactly? Other than creating FAKE / FALSEHOODS that the Bruchac's themselves have created about their ancestors and themselves (repeatedly) for their own status and profit.
(P.S. I am sure this will be ignored by the 'feel-good' Native People's in many communities ... because the truth and the facts are difficult to look at, to acknowledge and accept ... the Bruchac's DEPEND on that ignorance ... to gain what they have and continue to seek).
They are so DESPERATE to be Indians ... Jesse Bowman Bruchac created a website (quick as he could) in September 2015 when he heard I was researching his ancestors ...
WHY is it that the Y-DNA Haplogroup genetically tested and confirmed as R-Z2109 FROM EUROPE for Jesse Elmer Bowman and his brothers, and their father Lewis Bowman Sr.?
We know who Sophie Senecal dit LaFramboise / Rasberry' ancestors now and ALL OF HER ANCESTORS came from FRANCE. Joe Bruchac is a wonderful storyteller ... just like Iron Eye's Cody (the 100% percent Italian) and other Non-Native People's PLAYING INDIAN, whether in Hollywood or as authors ... and as presenters in public engagements.
ARE THEY PLASTIC or ARE THEY REAL?
THINK ABOUT IT
Question is:
Was Lewis Bowman Sr. actually of the Bowman family in reality, or was he genetically from a different surname altogether? (Stay tuned boys and girls ... )
M-269 > R-Z2109 is the Bowman Y-DNA Haplogroup and more testing is being done, to ascertain whether or not (further down the phylogenetic tree IF that Haplogroup Y-DNA R-Z2109 will change into a smaller more defined haplogroup, such as KMS67 and or FGC6444.
M-269 > R-Z2109 is the Bowman Y-DNA Haplogroup and more testing is being done, to ascertain whether or not (further down the phylogenetic tree IF that Haplogroup Y-DNA R-Z2109 will change into a smaller more defined haplogroup, such as KMS67 and or FGC6444.
Fake is Fake and Lies are Lies
TRUTH is what I am hunting ...