-moz-user-select:none; -webkit-user-select:none; -khtml-user-select:none; -ms-user-select:none; user-select:none;
Showing posts sorted by relevance for query wiseman bruchac. Sort by date Show all posts
Showing posts sorted by relevance for query wiseman bruchac. Sort by date Show all posts

Monday, March 14, 2016

Lewis Henry Bowman and Joseph Edward Bruchac Research Time Line Part 3:

January 12, 2016
Douglas Buchholz: Are you still sending you and your fathers kits back?

Jesse Bruchac: I plan on using at least mine; but a little wrinkle came about

Jesse Bruchac: Some Bowman you contacted then he contacted my dad and it spooked him big time.

Jesse Bruchac: Now my dad is saying I [Jesse Bruchac] can't trust you.

Jesse Bruchac: That's one reason I'm so pumped you got the other DNA and Y-DNA.

Yeah he [Joe Bruchac] just said to stay away from you.

Jesse Bruchac: Is it [the DNA] from the Lewis Bowman line?

Jesse Bruchac: He said he would do it [meaning the DNA testing] alone, without you involved, but I'm not pushing him.

Jesse Bruchac: He [Joseph Edward Bruchac III] took a leap of faith / which I respect / and I have joined him on it.

Douglas Buchholz: I also have another Bowman descendant’s kit coming tomorrow.

Jesse Bruchac: Is this Bowman in our line?

Douglas Buchholz: YES

Jesse Bruchac: Sweet

Douglas Buchholz: I wouldn't be testing him if he wasn't. LOL

Jesse Bruchac: From the Queensbury, NY crew?

Douglas Buchholz: I know he's from John Bowman and Catherine Dewey.

Jesse Bruchac: Descended from Forest?

Douglas Buchholz: I really can't ethically state who the testers are without their permission.

Douglas Buchholz: Its four steps out … with two between

Jesse Bruchac: Very cool. I’d love to see what of their Bowman DNA I carry

Jesse Bruchac: My mom also may have some native lines way back …  

Jesse Bruchac: She has Bedell’s and others in VT as well as mid-west Oklahoma ancestry    
  
Douglas Buchholz: So why is your Dad so concerned … If you don't mind me asking?

Jesse Bruchac: He sent me the email. The guy said you are trying to destroy him and disprove his native ancestry and sent a letter of your blog on us.

Jesse Bruchac: He feels now you have an agenda. Proof is hard to find as I said in my first songs on Aln8bak LOL
But I support your efforts and understand why others find them suspect.
I've always been a fan of using new technology; as you know DNA is just a new tool and should prove very interesting!!
The Natick Bowman starting with William is super interesting!!
I mapped it out as best I could but no clue where it begins or where the family scurried off to after selling big chunks of Massachusetts
William, John and Samuel Bowman
I'm thinking of a book on them at some point, they left a lot of records and mysteries behind them

Jesse Bruchac: It was this and being contacted by the Wampanoag’s [with the Bowman- Bruchac Time Line] a couple months back both added up to him just not wanting to work with you. But he has no ill will or anger towards you.

Jesse Bruchac: He [Joseph Edward Bruchac Jr.] remembers you as a fine artist (his words)
Gifted          
                                                                  
Jesse Bruchac: The Bowman line though likely goes back to a white [Caucasian] Bowman so who knows (Unless it's a name change).

Jesse Bruchac: One question is: Were there Bowman’s in Massachusetts in 1630? Likely but none I can find in Plymouth.
So on William Bowman born around then … I wonder why the last name (?) and I want to research it big time

Douglas Buchholz: I hope that you and your father do send your DNA kits in, of your own accord, without my involvement.

Jesse Bruchac: I will talk with him [Joseph E. Bruchac Jr.]. Maybe after we get some results from this Y-DNA line he'll be more inclined.

Douglas Buchholz: Samuel Bowman is ALLEGEDLY the son of 1-2 and then William Bowman of Natick.    

Jesse Bruchac: Yes Joseph Bowman is one of their main guys.

Douglas Buchholz: It’s an interesting dynamic to explore, but it might not be your lineage....
It might be but we don't know (yet).

Jesse Bruchac: Yeah connecting William then John then Samuel then Joseph is tricky
Yea I've seen no connection
Just the name

Douglas Buchholz: They moved around and were poor so being in the records is going to be sketchy just like Vermont's resident African people

Jesse Bruchac: I'm sure they too were mixed white and black listed as mulatto often

Douglas Buchholz: I am saddened to read that your father thinks that my questioning is simply a matter of allegedly trying to 'destroy' your Dad's work or anyone else's. Why not try to find Lewis Bowman's connections, whether he's Native or not eh?
Live Life. DNA doesn't change that.
One doesn't have to be Abenaki to be Abenaki these days.

Jesse Bruchac: Like I’ve said many believe in God too … No proof there or needed

Douglas Buchholz: What puzzles me is WHY I can't find Charles Bowman or Bauman and a Sophie Senecal/ Laframboise/ Rasberry.

Jesse Bruchac: They are mysteries. Maybe fabricated who knows? His Civil War Pension is whacked.

Douglas Buchholz: Would it change you or your father, IF the Y-DNA came back English or the like?
I would hope not!

Jesse Bruchac: Of course not; and likely considering the name etc. I know many natives who fail the DNA tests.

Jesse Bruchac: Family history is very complex as you know and just gets more so these days i.e., Bruce Jenner lol

Douglas Buchholz: Please, if you so choose, inform your father kindly, that I am NOT out to destroy anyone.

Douglas Buchholz: Previously you mentioned Jesse that, "He sent me the email. The guy said you are trying to destroy him and disprove his native ancestry and sent a letter of your blog on to us."
Douglas Buchholz: WHO SENT AN EMAIL FW from me and can you send me that email that I allegedly constructed?
I am pretty sure I know where in the blog he was looking:

http://reinventedvermontabenaki.blogspot.com/2013/02/joseph-bruchac-marge-margaret-bruchac.html

Douglas Buchholz: I noticed that blog post was way back in 2013 in Feb.

Jesse Bruchac: I honestly don't him

Douglas Buchholz: You didn't get his name? Yet he sent you the email? Or an email?

Jesse Bruchac: Between you and me his name is Mike Levet

Douglas Buchholz: Ok, BETWEEN you and me, I am going to FORWARD you the emails I sent to him

Jesse Bruchac: But I don't know him.

Douglas Buchholz: I told you I was and am going to be up front with you and straight forward.
I want YOU to know EXACTLY verbatim what I typed and sent to him.

Jesse Bruchac: I wouldn't worry about it

Douglas Buchholz: I am not worried or the like.

Jesse Bruchac: My Dad’s fine and may actually still do the test.

Douglas Buchholz: But trying to imply that I am attempting to destroy his native ancestry is a bit much.

Jesse Bruchac: I think it's the tone of your blog. Many people see it that way to be honest.

Douglas Buchholz: Yes, I would just change the password and that locks me out of seeing his or your results. Though I was hoping to work WITH you both.

Jesse Bruchac: You come across like you have an axe to grind with the "wanabenakis" or whatever degrading term you used (wink emoticon) You have a lot of haters my friend but I'm sure you are aware of this

Douglas Buchholz: Well as the Devil says right along with God "Get in line" … and “Take a number”.

Douglas Buchholz: I just sent you both of the ONLY sent communications to Michael Levet...

Jesse Bruchac: It's no big deal. I'll read them though

Douglas Buchholz: I don't get it where I am implying that I am doing what he has implied I have. It confuses me but doesn't bother me now that I know who it is.
Just between you and me. If I didn't have a thick skin I wouldn't be doing this work.

Douglas Buchholz: If the DNA shows native or leads us to it, where is the negative agenda on my part?
Just change the passwords and test yourselves. You will match these other Bowman’s I am testing.
I just want to find Lewis Bowman's ancestors paper trail whoever they are.

Jesse Bruchac: Perfect. I'm in.

Jesse Bruchac: Yeah you kind’a gone off like a dick saying “Joseph Bruchac’s say-so?”

From Michael Levet’s email from my person on Jan. 11, 2016 wherein I stated (quote)

“Myself I am looking for Lewis Bowman's ancestors, aside from relying just on Joe Bruchac's say-so.
I am seeking definitives and proof paper trail as to Lewis' ancestral lineage.”

[Definition of Say–so: a statement that is not supported by any proof. One's unsupported assertion or assurance]

Jesse Bruchac: Umm, this is not nice to talk to others in someone's family that's not your own IMHO

I think Mike was defending his family

Douglas Buchholz: Oh. Ok. Clarify. Please.

Jesse Bruchac: People don't like others creeping when not related … but I’m sure you've felt this before.

“Myself I am looking for Lewis Bowman's ancestors, aside from relying just on Joe Bruchac's say-so. I am seeking definitives and proof paper trail as to Lewis' ancestral lineage”

The rest seems legit but that likely sent him [Joseph Bruchac Jr. and or Michael Levet] into not trusting you.

Douglas Buchholz: Well that is true. I am not trying to rely ‘on just your Dad's perceptions’ and so on
I do understand what you’re saying though.

Jesse Bruchac: … Then [Michael Levet] seeing your blog = Red flags!! = “This guy is trying to destroy you Joe.”

Just saying I see where he gets it. I have had many people ask if I'm pissed about your blog
I'm always like … whatever he has a right to his opinions.

Douglas Buchholz: If I was trying to destroy someone I wouldn't be posting that intention and then asking for their help through, such as yourself and your father.

Jesse Bruchac: But my dad had never seen it. Your tone in the blog is often condescending. As if he was lying etc … That's what rubs people.

Douglas Buchholz: Well when you 'see' what I do, it is difficult not to get condescending. It’s a matter of perception(s) indeed

Jesse Bruchac: Assumptions and leaps of faith are one thing and rarely backed up by facts.
Yup … perception and point of view.

Douglas Buchholz: I mean that was back in Feb 2013 and its now 2016. Perceptions change too.

Jesse Bruchac: We believe in the end what we want to believe when facts are scarce

Douglas Buchholz: And that is what I am after … is FACTS.

Jesse Bruchac: Me too and that's why we work together so well

Jesse Bruchac: I do understand your tone and it's never bothered me. Hard questions and questions in general are the only way to find truth.

Jesse Bruchac: But please know I'm always honest with you based on my particular biased opinions

Jesse Bruchac: I will say, as a family our intentions, are pure and I know you know that
I love the language hence my involvement whether I have native ancestry or not it matters to me.

Jesse Bruchac: My dad actually stood up for you as I said

Jesse Bruchac: He told Mike you were a good guy and a great artist who I have remained friends with. Over 20 year’s nid8ba

Jesse Bruchac: He just agreed he didn't feel he could trust you, but that's understandable, when we look at the facts in play here.

Douglas Buchholz: Again = perception

Jesse Bruchac: You and I can play together under everyone's radar … Finding truth … And pissing people off along the way.

March 08, 2016
Jesse Bruchac: But the “no native links” is not really possible according to experts
It’s just a probability
Not enough info to prove anything
As far as ancestry with DNA

Douglas Buchholz: Joseph Sénécal dit Laframboise and his wife Marie Josephte Geneviève Gosselin.
Their son Jean Baptiste Pierre Sénécal dit Laframboise moved into Rutland County, Vermont as well.

Jesse Bruchac: And we are connected to them? Likely looking at the family finder matches?

Douglas Buchholz: Yes that is true, somewhat, but we are ONLY talking about 1-2-3-4 steps; Not 9-10- or 18 steps out.
IF Lewis Bowman or Jesse were Abenakis or Obomsawin's it would show on the autosomal and or Y
And that kindly, and respectfully, is NOT showing at all.

Jesse Bruchac: Not totally true. We don't know all the Abenaki DNA.

Douglas Buchholz:
We KNOW what the Bowman DNA is showing and what it is not.
Bowman's are NOT O'bomsawin’s.

Jesse Bruchac: I agree the direct Y [Bowman] ancestor is not an O’Bomsawin.

Douglas Buchholz: And IF Lewis Henry Bowman and or his son Jesse or John etc were Abenakis, it would show it.

Jesse Bruchac: But that's one of 10,000 or so not accounted for

Douglas Buchholz: Even if their spouses were Native, it would show it, and it isn't.

Jesse Bruchac: I don't get how

Douglas Buchholz: This is Mr. Bowman's ethnic make up

Jesse Bruchac: That's all probabilityfrom a company. Read the link I sent. I don't buy it
Only if we had actual data on Abenakis could we target the group and it’s far from complete

Douglas Buchholz: But again IF the DNA were Native without 3-4 people going back from son to father, to grandfather, to great grandfather = it would show up.

Jesse Bruchac: I think it does it's just not been recorded. If you added us in as native it would be. That's why Lewis is such a mystery to you.
Douglas Buchholz: So what you are implying is that you don't believe the Y is M269 from Europe and you don't believe the results?

Jesse Bruchac: Studies show in only 5% percent of natives have tested. But so few have been tested its non-conclusive. Especially in the northeast. Where there was earlier contact.

Douglas Buchholz: If the Y markers match the Lexington/ Watertown MA Bowman’s then we know your Bowman's from England.

Jesse Bruchac: Perhaps there will be a probability though

Douglas Buchholz: You’re wrong; probabilities do not exist in Y or mtDNA results

Jesse Bruchac: It's just not fact but likelihood

Jesse Bruchac: It's all math. But I'm not arguing that the bowman line does not go to Europe …
It is very likely it does … from the results we've seen. But so do many natives. So it's a matter of time-frames too, more probability factors. You should read about why tribes don't use DNA
For paternity yes …

Douglas Buchholz: I've read all about tribes not using DNA, and yet contrary to that as a whole, there are MANY people doing DNA testing within those tribes, including the not-so-legit ones. White people claiming to be what they ain't
And like you said, claiming their DNA is native when it never was.

Jesse Bruchac: DNA is not the only factor tribes look at

Jesse Bruchac: I'm fully accepted as Abenaki … By those who I care about.

Jesse Bruchac: Yup it's a long story. Lewis Gill … He was accepted by some … Not all … Some still call the Gill family whites.

Jesse Bruchac: There are tons of Sénécal still here but not related to us. Young and Wood.

Jesse Bruchac: Those are two other families in the cemetery with Lewis Henry Bowman.

Jesse Bruchac: Well the one near his house off Ormsby Road on Cold Hill

Jesse Bruchac: I think there may be a connection to the Young family

Jesse Bruchac: Because he lives right near their cemetery and on their land in Porter Corners, NY

Jesse Bruchac: Maybe he just worked for them. I don't know.

Jesse Bruchac: I should make a trip up there. The stones are really old but I think in the town record

Douglas Buchholz: Because we are talking 1-2 generations it’s not like recombination would affect...
This is why I am telling you 100% that neither Lewis Bowman nor his sons were genetically Native....
Because it would show itself very clearly itself. I even used Gedmatch to see if I could detect it lowering the cM ratio or threshold. And while we know you are descended from Ots-took it’s so far back that recombination would have destroyed any genetic inheritance 3-4 generations down from her, so it is undetectable within the two Bowman testers. But genealogically we know the connection is there ancestrally speaking.

Jesse Bruchac:  So if Lewis had any native it's how far back to not show?

Douglas Buchholz: Yet even with Lewis H. Bowman not perhaps being a Bowman, whoever he was, he was not native genetically speaking

Jesse Bruchac: 10 generations? And what are you looking for if all Abenaki DNA is not known
There could be matches … just unrecorded

Douglas Buchholz: Hold on pulling something as a comparative for you.

Douglas Buchholz:

1. Ots Toch
2. Elizabeth VanSlyck
3. Cornelius VanBuren
4. Aaltje VanNess VanBuren
5. Hendrikje Fonda VanBuren
6. Douwe VanAntwerp
7. Winant Van Antwerp
8. Daniel Wynet Van Antwerp
9. Alice Van Antwerp
10. Jesse Elmer Bowman
11. Marion Flora Bowman
12. Joseph Bruchac
13. Jesse Bowman Bruchac

Douglas Buchholz: Ok so by #7 the DNA is so fractured atDNA autosomal recombination, Ots-Toch (No. 1) is barely going to be possibly detectable in #8 even.

Jesse Bruchac: Got it. But read this:

Jesse Bruchac: Genetic Ancestry Testing – This kind of testing looks at many genes from an individual and compares their sample to a larger database of research information. This test is based on probabilities and can provide information about how different or similar an individual’s DNA is to that of most people within a larger group of people (“population”). However, these results are limited by the information in current databases, many of which do not contain a lot of information for particular groups (AI/ANs among them). This limitation in the data can produce problems for tribes and individuals seeking information as results may not be accurate or even possible to generate given limited availability of comparative data.

Douglas Buchholz:  And that is a 10% likelihood that if we even tested #8 that it would show up

Jesse Bruchac: Limited data

Douglas Buchholz: Exactly, that is WHY I was hoping you and your father would test as well, to get a better picture of what’s really going on with Lewis Bowman. Limited data in some ways.

Jesse Bruchac: Not in the ways the companies selling these kits want you to see it.

Jesse Bruchac: They are selling probabilities to people based on their assumptions
Their data sets. I believe the Maliseet are working their DNA now.

Douglas Buchholz: I agree that SOME companies are shady. But I am looking at the Y markers and the Haplo-group … which is very stable over a span of ca. 100 years. We don't have the issues or dynamics of recombination.
Beliefs vs. reality and so on.

Jesse Bruchac: Yup. I'm glad you understand me. Texting can sound snarky.

Jesse Bruchac: I'm not being snarky; just digging at what we know for clarity and pointing out the limits I've seen and wonder about.

Jesse Bruchac: I know I'm Abenaki. I know why. And a lot of people have been hard on me about it for years. I've learned to just be me. If it upsets some … okay I'm good with that.

Douglas Buchholz: That’s up to you and or your father.
Let me play Devil's Advocate. How are you Abenaki Jesse?
Culturally?

Jesse Bruchac: Yes

Douglas Buchholz: Genealogically and or Genetically?

Jesse Bruchac: Can't prove that

Douglas Buchholz: In the heart?

Jesse Bruchac: Yes. Definitely can't prove two of those.But I'll take the cultural. It's what matters most IMHO and that of those I love.

Jesse Bruchac: Working on a film for IPTN with pep about this very topic.

Douglas Buchholz: Kewl. What’s the film about?

Jesse Bruchac: Identity politics

Douglas Buchholz: Yep

Jesse Bruchac: The good, the bad, the ugly

Douglas Buchholz: Well some will condemn me and claim I have an agenda and that I am out to destroy this or that, but that is definitely not my intention.

Jesse Bruchac: But most importantly the struggle for cultural survival in the face of changing blood quantum’s and genetic connections.

Douglas Buchholz: Be that as it may be, as to some people’s perceptions of my research. I don't see them helping me to get the answers either.

Jesse Bruchac: You're a good man with a passion

Douglas Buchholz: Many articles claim Bowman was or is Obomsawin, and no one tried to prove it out.

Jesse Bruchac: Not all the same kind of "fakers"

Douglas Buchholz: I am doing that now

Jesse Bruchac: It doesn't prove out

Douglas Buchholz: Same with the Phelps and Philips. I got the two within one mile of each other in the 1820's

Jesse Bruchac: It was a theory

Douglas Buchholz: Perpetuated as a fact

Jesse Bruchac: A guess. Accepted as fact. Yes perpetuated by many
In fact Rick O’Bomsawin demands in his cousin
But not close enough to not date his daughter [Pepper O’Bomsawin] lol
Luckily

Douglas Buchholz: ‘Demands in his cousin’?

Jesse Bruchac: I am his cousin that is

Douglas Buchholz: You are speaking of Rick O'Bomsawin?

Jesse Bruchac: Yes

Douglas Buchholz: How so? Interesting....

Jesse Bruchac: He [Rick O’Bomsawin] says we are related. But that is more a statement of respect
We have been close for years and he has appreciated my help.
He once told Joseph Elie Joubert he could prove it, when Elie was on the hunt for my head in the 1990’s
Luckily Elie and I now see eye to eye. He has become like a Grampa to my kids.

Jesse Bruchac: I guess the point I see is, I'm really honored to be accepted by some. Even called family. But I know I cannot, nor can anyone prove that I am. It's something we feel. Complicated yet so simple. Making relatives is an ancient Native tradition, and my dad began making relatives when I was just a wee lad. Maurice Dennis being the first.

Jesse Bruchac: I consider you a relative too, can't prove that one either

Douglas Buchholz: Nope sorry, my genetic DNA doesn't match your Bowman ancestors

Jesse Bruchac: It gets tricky when the whole entitlements, recognition fights, etc kick in.
I'm not in those fights

Jesse Bruchac: As you know. It becomes about power, money, and greed. Casinos!! Never good

Douglas Buchholz: And status and ego and identity appropriation as well

Jesse Bruchac: I do take ego, i.e. Pride in my personal accomplishments. But I can speak the language as a white guy

Jesse Bruchac: They called me the white guy on the set of Saints and Strangers.

Jesse Bruchac: Native humor. We were great friends and I am physically white, just red on the inside.

Jesse Bruchac: I'm actually learning a new dialect for a film this summer. Working with Conor Quin of Portland, Maine on it.

Douglas Buchholz: I've been working on the 2nd Bowman testers’ autosomal results since Sunday evening. What’s the film?

Jesse Bruchac: Can't say anything yet

Jesse Bruchac: Under contract. But, it’s always fun testing a new dialect on my kids. They just seem to get it, which is amazing.

Douglas Buchholz: Well, as I learn more about the Senecal's and Bowman's etc I am mapping it out in comparatives between the genealogies and going after the paper trail documents

Jesse Bruchac: So are these particular Senecal’s for sure? Is Sophie really a Senecal or was that a married name?

Douglas Buchholz: Sénécal dit Laframboise I surmise is her biological maiden name.
This is WHY we are seeing repeated comparatives back into the Sénécal dit Laframboise and Gosselin ancestry with the matches of the two Bowman descendants in both results, on FTDNA and Gedmatch.
If she wasn't a Sénécal dit Laframboise by conception and subsequent birth, we wouldn't be getting that in the genetic matching.

Jesse Bruchac: Nice. So there are matches there. Very good to start to uncover her a bit more

Douglas Buchholz: And genealogically with Edgar Vexter Senecal and his kith and kin going back and forth to Greenfield NY and Rutland etc. And then moving the genealogy back up into Quebec, on several of his grandfather's brothers doing the same... Yeah I think that we have Sophie Senecal's people
Btw. they were NOT native people's either. They were 100% French
I followed genealogical every last one of Joseph Sénécal dit Laframboise and Marie Genevieve Gosselin's ancestors back to France.

Jesse Bruchac: Really … 100%?

Jesse Bruchac: Wow

Douglas Buchholz: Jean Baptiste 'Pierre" Sénécal dit Laframboise was born in 1807. He married twice, a Beauregard and then to a Massé.

Jesse Bruchac: But we don't have her parents … just a connection to these pure French relatives?

Douglas Buchholz: Throughout the matches on FTDNA and a number of them on Gedmatch, Bowman's DNA is matching to people with Gosselin ancestry of Joseph's wife Genevieve.

Jesse Bruchac: Sophie … She's just related through her dad’s line to these Senecal’s by way of probability. We don't know her dads name.

Douglas Buchholz: It’s not a probability Jesse. The DNA segments are being passed down through another tester that matches BOTH Bowman testers.

Jesse Bruchac: They are relatives … just saying we don't have her dad?

Douglas Buchholz: It can't be passed down UNLESS there is a genetic inheritance by both testers.

Douglas Buchholz: Sophie Senecal's parents are # 5 in the above jpeg I just sent
Yes we have her father.
Jesse Bruchac: You know that for sure?

Douglas Buchholz: We are getting Senecal paternal matches as well. Not just the Gosselin side.
Yes I know that definitively

1. Ignace Gosselin – Marie Anne Raté       1. Adrien Sénécal dit Laframboise – Jeanne Lecompte
2. Ignace Gosselin – Marguerite Godbout          2. Étienne Sénécal– Pétronille Milot /Laval
3. Ignace Gosselin – Marie Catherine Rosseau   3. Louis Sénécal – Marie Louise Petit / Lapré
4. Ignace Gosselin – Marie Angélique Plouffe     4. Joseph Sénécal – Marie Charlotte Delagé
5. Marie Josephte Geneviève Gosselin ––– married 1798 ––– 5. Joseph Sénécal dit Laframboise

6. Charles Bowman – Sophie Sénécal dit Laframboise     
7. Lewis Henry Bowman – Alice Van Antwerp      
8. John Jack Bowman – Katherine Jane Gray       4. Jesse Elmer Bowman – 2m. Marion Dunham 
9. Son of …                          5. Daughter of …      5. Marion Bowman – Joseph Edward Bruchac II
10. Tester 1 Y/atDNA     6. Tester 2 atDNA         6. Joseph Edward Bruchac III

Jesse Bruchac: That's amazing

Douglas Buchholz: There are certain mathematical rules to autosomal inheritance, sometimes its random sometimes the DNA segment is large enough to be passed down through the generations far longer of time than usually the case
.
Jesse Bruchac: Well, I so appreciate the new family connection! This is really great to have, wliwni nid8ba!!

Jesse Bruchac: My French pride is soaring tonight

Jesse Bruchac: Peps [Pepper O’Bowsawin] teaching me French so now I have a probable connection to it lol
Provable

Jesse Bruchac: Definitely well it's late nid8ba. Time for bed! Wliwni. For all your time seriously thank you.


Douglas Buchholz: "Many articles regarding your father and family claim and imply that Bowman's were Obomsawin's"

Douglas: "How are you Abenaki Jesse? Genealogically? Genetically?

Jesse Bruchac: Can't prove that.
Douglas: "... in the heart?

Jesse Bruchac: Yes, definitely we can't prove that we're Abenakis genealogically or genetically ... but I'll take the cultural. It's what matters most in my humble opinion and that of those I love. We're not all the same kind of "fakers”.

Jesse Bruchac: The Bowman being Obomsawin doesn't prove out
Jesse Bruchac: It was a theory
Jesse Bruchac: A guess
Jesse Bruchac: Accepted as fact

Douglas Buchholz : Perpetuated by your family and naive others as fact ... to as many people as would believe it

Jesse Bruchac: I am really honored to be accepted by some, even called family. But I know I cannot, nor can anyone prove that I am Abenaki.

Jesse Bruchac: It's something we feel. Complicated, yet so simple
Making relatives is an ancient Native tradition.
My Dad began making relatives when I was just a wee lad. Maurice Dennis being the first.

Jesse Bruchac: But I can speak the language as a white guy.

Jesse Bruchac: But most importantly the struggle for cultural survival in the face of changing blood quantum’s, genetic connections

Jesse Bruchac: They called me the white guy on set of "Saints & Strangers." We were great friends and I am physically white, just red on the inside.

Jesse Bruchac: We could work only with what we had and honestly stand by it. Sorry but it's our lives.

Jesse Bruchac: Yes but still have moved forward on a chosen path

Jesse Bruchac: DNA or not, because we believe, and live it. That's the only answer I got.

Jesse Bruchac: You can choose to believe in anything in life. Based on the life my dad raised me in. And his grandfather raised him to find.

Jesse Bruchac: My kids consider themselves Abenaki too. It's how they are being raised with the language and pride in it.

Jesse Bruchac: Well, you didn't have anything to go on (until the recent discoveries in your DNA work) so I understand the process, but it doesn't change anything. What's real is how we live. Not our blood or papers.

Jesse Bruchac:  I think many would argue we have helped in many ways and will continue to.

Jesse Bruchac: Facts about the DNA work are not facts they are just results of your research and don't tell the whole truth. Just one lens to look through. You have a clear opinion, and that's fine.

Jesse Bruchac: What makes someone Abenaki? And who decides?

Douglas Buchholz: I think what I am saying is IF what you stated yesterday that what has been SAID was theory and guessing, then where are the FACTS

Douglas Buchholz: What makes someone Abenaki ... TRUTH and INTEGRITY.

Jesse Bruchac:  We didn't have all the facts because they were never available, nor do you.

Douglas Buchholz: Abenakis have truth and integrity.

Jesse Bruchac: Are you seriously getting on a high horse?

Jesse Bruchac: You have some answers from your work, and those answers are making you judgmental.

Jesse Bruchac: We still don't know everything. My dad took a leap of faith in his beliefs. I have said that, as has he.

Jesse Bruchac: And with a good heart he began working towards investing in his native identity
Learning  ...

Jesse Bruchac: I will always say native but the DNA is a tool that would be great if it showed it ... But if it doesn't then that's just not the only measure I turn to that's all. In for life and hope I help along the way.

Jesse Bruchac: Like I said long ago ... Do you believe in God?

Douglas Buchholz: If what has been published and presented in the Bruchac presentations and books etc, have been merely theories and guesses, WHY were those guesses and theories implied to be facts, when they weren't?
And why weren't those implied statements clarified and corrected throughout the years, as being only theories and guesses. Etc.
I mean I get that you are doing what you do and choices are made to do this or that. Yet what has been written and repeatedly presented by your father, your Marge, and yourself ... has been presented as though it were facts.

Jesse Bruchac: I think that's something you should ask my dad honestly

Douglas Buchholz: Such as "St. Francis" or that he was an Abenaki. And you have stated as of yesterday that it has been theory and guesses. I am asking YOU. Your father Joseph Bruchac, (as you well) know, will not speak with me.

Jesse Bruchac: It was based on what he saw in the Civil War pension records.

Douglas Buchholz: He thinks that I have an agenda and that I'm out to destroy your family. There is no St. Francis in the Pension Jesse. Lewis clearly stated or implied that he was born in East Farnham, Qc. on July 20, 1844

Douglas Buchholz: NOT "St. Francis" at all.

Jesse Bruchac: I think that this could be clarified and was something he suspected but that was his choice, not mine. I also for a time said and am on the record saying I thought we were from Obomsawin’s. It was a really strong belief of ours for many years.

Jesse Bruchac: We have been trying. Working though, at the same time and I have no regrets.

Jesse Bruchac: I've learned and taught the Abenaki language to many people because of this unproven Abenaki ... Call it a passion.

Jesse Bruchac: Bowman is Not Obomsawin is known now for sure, and will be reflected in his future work as well as mine. I think I pulled back from that theory about a decade ago when it looked unlikely.

Jesse Bruchac: I appreciate the work. I meant that connections were made on faith. That we could not prove ...

Jesse Bruchac: I think that is common in family genealogies. So many say or decide they have royal lines

Jesse Bruchac: But can't totally prove it. We went on the “facts” at hand.

Douglas Buchholz: I shouldn't have to go hunting for the proof of this St. Francis theory or the like. I shouldn't have to ask to see the substantiation of something stated in multiple books etc.

Jesse Bruchac: Bowman’s Store says that.

Douglas Buchholz: And this isn't just about Bowman's or Bruchac's but also about Frederick Matthew Wiseman (PhD), his lies and implied shit, and a thousand other dynamics and “I’m-an-Abenaki” peddlers and pushers.

Jesse Bruchac: You don't have to ask anything. You choose to. You don't have to police the Abenaki.

Douglas Buchholz: I never implied I was the police of the Abenakis

Jesse Bruchac: No one hired you to judge … you chose to and that's your passion

Douglas Buchholz: They can do that well enough on their own

Jesse Bruchac: And we do.

Jesse Bruchac: My family is unique like the Wiseman’s etc.

Jesse Bruchac: The New England native heritage dynamic is certainly amazing and complicated. But those who claim their native heritage have historically done it based on faith when other evidence was not available.

Jesse Bruchac: My dad started thinking it was just Mohawk. Then Homer Saint Francis sent John Moody to visit us and he convinced my dad he was Abenaki and to enroll. He gave us a whole bunch of information, as he did with many.

Jesse Bruchac: It changed my dad and our family path.

Jesse Bruchac: He was very convincing. Gave us all cards etc.

Jesse Bruchac: That was when my dad met Maurice Dennis and started learning about Abenaki stories and published The Wind Eagle.

Jesse Bruchac: I don't have all the answers. But I'm always as honest as I can be. Total open book. I'm not ashamed of my dad or his choices but they were his, as mine are mine.

Jesse Bruchac: We were on the path and so proud to be. It is as the Abenaki in VT revolution (You remember?)

Jesse Bruchac: A different time ... But I have just found my little part with the language and songs and stories which I love.

Douglas Buchholz: When you stated your father accused me of having an agenda and out to destroy your family, I was like WTF?!

Jesse Bruchac: And will continue to work to preserve. No worries on that he just has friends who you have looked into and he has heard from John Moody about you. John [Moody] says bad things about you btw. But I'm sure you suspected as much.

Jesse Bruchac: He affected a lot of people including me.

Jesse Bruchac: John Scott Moody got me into the language, which I am very thankful for.
Douglas Buchholz: Only reason John Moody says bad things about me is because he KNOWS I know what I speak of. I don't operate on theory or guesses.

Jesse Bruchac: Everything in life is a long shot. You never really know. I'm willing to roll the dice and believe I guess.

Jesse Bruchac: So many with native blood don't care ... I care and have little blood a drop.

Jesse Bruchac: I'd rather care and be a wannabe. Makes the mainstream have to deal with and see that Native traditions are still affecting and alive and influential. Desirable to be included in.

Jesse Bruchac: We know that for 5 generations from the testers there is no native.

Jesse Bruchac: Are they the same generation from as my dad?

Douglas Buchholz: Clarification ... WE KNOW there is no native genetic contribution from Lewis Henry Bowman back five of his ancestors backwards.

Jesse Bruchac: So that would mean that at most my dad could be 1/64 native if there was a native ancestor in the sixth generation back?

Douglas Buchholz: The testers (two of them) are the same generational descent, yes, as your father.
Jesse Bruchac: You didn't test Lewis Henry Bowman.

Douglas Buchholz: Say Lewis is #1, so you go 2, 3, 4 ... Much like Lewis (1.), Jesse (2.), Marion (3.), Joseph III (your Dad) (No. 4) and then you Jesse would be No. 5.

Jesse Bruchac: So at most we can say that at 6 generations there might have been another unknown native.

Douglas Buchholz: It can't be there, because it wasn't there to begin with, due to recombination.
Jesse Bruchac: Right so DNA won't help in this.

Jesse Bruchac: This is why we can't see the genetic contribution from Ots-toch.

Jesse Bruchac: Only the Y-DNA line which goes to Europe.

Jesse Bruchac: I appreciate the honesty and just was clarifying my feelings as to my personal choices to identify as an Abenaki that's all.

Douglas Buchholz: If you don't believe the results of the DNA that I am sharing with you. My strong suggestion, respectfully, is do the DNA tests and see for yourselves those results.

Jesse Bruchac: No … I do believe them … I'm just trying to get a full understanding of what it means and putting it into perspective.

Jesse Bruchac: As you said the truth about the non-connection to O’Bomsawin is important and the fact of who Sophie is.

Jesse Bruchac: I accept it.

Jesse Bruchac: Do you think Sophie Senecal's husband Joseph or Charles might have taken the name Bowman?

Jesse Bruchac: He obviously had a white male ancestor due to the Y line going to Europe.

Jesse Bruchac: But I'm thinking he may have been part black, can we see any signs of this? If not, can we find any known black families in the area who we can try to match him to in the Family Finder.
Just a thought: to locate whether Bowman is the real name or an assumed name.

Jesse Bruchac: I'm going to share all this with my dad tomorrow it's a lot of information but I want him up to speed.

Jesse Bruchac: I think the story is amazing and I just want to ensure I have it straight

Jesse Bruchac: To tell my dad so he knows the facts as you have uncovered via Y-DNA and Family Finder

Jesse Bruchac: I got to tell Pepper Obomsawin too we are in no way related. She comes in tomorrow for the weekend.

Jesse Bruchac: For 5 generations back from my dad there are no native ancestors ... We know this ... because of what genetic test?

Jesse Bruchac: There is therefore no Abenaki for at least five generations back ... Fact? No Native?
Jesse Bruchac: There is NO Native American DNA in the two testers.

Douglas Buchholz: I would say that within the time range we are looking at, yes there is certainty…
Because it’s not like the Great-Grandson is going to lose that much genetic data from their Great-Grandparents. As you step back further and further generationally the DNA segments get smaller and smaller and smaller ... the genetic ability to see back gets murkier.

Jesse Bruchac: So I can tell him for certain that there is no chance he is more than 1/64 Indian. With certainty? Maybe less. Based on the results.

Jesse Bruchac: Right, He's definitely not full blooded. Could be small part black or native or who knows what.

Jesse Bruchac: If it turns out the only native we have is 1600's and we can really prove that, then I'd like my dad to know and be able to explain it.

Jesse Bruchac: I think going from someone who thought for sure we were Abenaki, to finding out we aren't, is doable.

Jesse Bruchac: Would change some things but not everything. And it would be reflected in my Dad’s writing.

Jesse Bruchac: He writes about everything as you know

Douglas Buchholz: What I am doing as a person ought to have been done YEARS AGO way before I came here.

Jesse Bruchac: I know you understand. I think the technology wasn't here. This is a new tool and it's just being built. As new people's data is entered.

Jesse Bruchac: I'll still teach the language, just as a white guy with a distant native ancestor. Worst case scenario ... But I'm sticking with my passion.

Jesse Bruchac: Always will consider myself part of the Abenaki though, as it’s been so much a part of my life.

Jesse Bruchac: Just clearly not provable.

Douglas Buchholz: I think that the reason why John Moody badmouths me is because I don't play secrets and hiding the whatever.

Jesse Bruchac: I understand. John Moody messed with a lot of lives my friend. Yours and mine.

Jesse Bruchac: Our family is out of it for the most part. But being pulled back in now to Odanak.
But I can teach songs and help whatever we discover.

Jesse Bruchac: The VT thing has gone nutty.

Douglas Buchholz: John Scott Moody isn’t any black man either

Jesse Bruchac: I heard he proved it. That's what he told me.

Douglas Buchholz: Thinking about this morning when last evening you asked me "So I can tell him for certain there is no chance he is more than 1/64 Indian?" Here is my answer (and I know you are good at math):

1. Ots Toch - married a Dutchman VanSlyck =she was 100% Mohawk Indian woman

2. Elizabeth VanSlyck - married a VanBuren =so she would be 50% Mohawk Indian woman

3. Cornelius VanBuren - married a Dutch woman =he would be 1/4% Mohawk Indian man

4. Aaltje VanNess VanBuren = she would be 1/8th  Mohawk Indian woman

5. Hendrikje Fonda VanBuren = 1/16th  Mohawk Indian woman

6. Douwe VanAntwerp = 1/36th Mohawk Indian

7. Winant Van Antwerp = A drop 1/64th = "Damn near nothing"

8. Daniel Wynet Van Antwerp = 1/128th = "Tiny Drop"

9. Alice Van Antwerp - 1/256th = Her was husband Lewis H. Bowman Sr.

10. Jesse Elmer Bowman -- 1/512th = He ain't no Mohawk or an Abenaki ! 

11. Marion Flora Bowman - 1/1024th = She swore up and down she weren't no Indian!

12. Joseph Edward Bruchac III - 1/2048th = There ain't no NDN drops left

13. Jesse Bowman Bruchac - 1/4096th = “Abenaki” based on Beliefs, Theories, Guesses

Douglas Buchholz: So you do the math.

To claim that that Joseph Edward Bruchac III (the Author, Presenter, etc) is even 1/64th is not accurate.
Not even his great grandfather Lewis Henry Bowman Sr. was even a 64th if we go by what we actually KNOW for a fact, historically, genealogically and genetically.
(Remember, I don't go by theories, guesses, belief, faith or conjecture, suppositions or stories i.e. "oral history")

Jesse Bruchac: I just meant that it proves that at most, he might be 1/64th. Since we can prove he is not anything in 5 generations, and myself in 6 generations.

Douglas Buchholz: Jesse Elmer Bowman is not even a "1/64th"

The ONLY native ancestry that is known and detectable genealogically speaking, is Ots-Tooch, the Mohawk Indian woman.

Jesse Bruchac: I'm saying the unknown is beyond 5 generations back. I'm just saying 6 generations back that there are still unknowns.

Jesse Bruchac: There are chances that other Van Antwerp's or other 10 gens deep etc might of had other native lives we don't know about

Jesse Bruchac: We know that no one is Indian 5 generations back from him but we don't know that everyone 6 back is not.

Whatever may have been there or not is not showing up because it is way back.

I think the reality is we are a family that became involved and fully a part of the Abenaki based on faith and acceptance by some.

Done work in the communities ... which will continue.

But have discovered the theories and stories were not correct based on DNA.

While we have a distant native ancestor who can be traced, it is from the 1600's. That is what we know. It is actually all we have known for sure since May 2009 when you told me of that Mohawk ancestor, Ots-Toch.

I think it's a great chapter in the whole identity search so many of us are on.

Jesse Bruchac: I have a question regarding the Bowman's who've tested ... to tell my dad?

How are they [the Bowman genetic testers] related to Lewis Henry Bowman? They are from one of his son's son's obviously.

Douglas Buchholz: One is a direct male. One is not. They are first cousins to one another and they descend from Jack Bowman and Catherine Gray.

Jesse Bruchac: So only one Bowman has tested with Y-DNA line?

Douglas Buchholz: You can see the markers for the Y of the Bowman tester by googling "460662 Lewis Bowman."
The results are online now, in the Bowman Surname Project. It is Haplo - group R-M269 at this point of the testing.


Jesse Bruchac: Looking forward to more info and it is a change that we will reflect, in everything we do, now that the new information is being obtained.
He was really interested in the Katherine Gray might of had kids with Jesse idea raised by Jack
We have distant native ancestry. That's all that can be proven. 

Jesse Bruchac: And the tribe Abenaki looks to have been wrong.

As things roll out and more info is confirmed I'll get it on my bowman page too
You're doing a very thorough job all the way I know and I appreciate it.

When it goes up I may just use it as my reference to make sure I get the details right.

Douglas Buchholz: We all know your family is very close friends with John and Donna (nee:Carvalho) Moody

Jesse Bowman: I still do programs for him at Dartmouth and that's it. He is working to save the language so I support it.

Douglas Buchholz: Yeah like as if we need white people to save the Abenaki.

Jesse Bowman: I think he [John Scott Moody] was dishonest to many about their genealogies
Douglas Buchholz: That’s an understatement

Jesse Bowman: If it turns out we have 100% proof we are not Abenaki we will say it

Douglas Buchholz: I don't think you have a choice in the matter to be honest

Jesse Bowman: I just talked with someone who doesn't like me this winter and said all I know is we have some native ancestry. It's the truth.

Jesse Bruchac: We thought it was Abenaki. My dad is interested in a second book on Bowman's store. It will include this and our families’ journey to find the truth whatever it is.
It might be an even more interesting book now that it seems we were wrong on several claims and righting them is important!

Jesse Bowman: I'm sure experts from his Publishing Houses will pick it apart to make sure it's accurate before he makes any grand changes to his personal identification as an Abenaki etc.
That's a big step that must be verified.

Jesse Bowman: Once verified it will change things for sure. I'll still teach Abenaki though … but just to help.

Jesse Bowman: I'll be another Gordon Day lol. Still support and help in every way I can.
If they prove to be wrong then they were wrong.
It's a complex web and you're doing the hard work to untangle it.
There is no provable evidence
And it is likely wrong

Jesse Bruchac: The mistakes of making false claims has been done by me, I accept them. But if I'm wrong I'll say it.

Jesse Bruchac: I can only speak for myself in saying those times I claimed my Abenaki pride all came from a place that I believed was well intentioned and based on what I knew. I connected dots at times and if those connections were wrong then I was wrong. I am just again need to be sure.

The mistakes of making false claims? Let's EXPLORE that in the next post ...


Tuesday, October 3, 2023

The Latest Questions Regarding the Bruchac's in Greenfield, Saratoga County, New York

Review of genealogies, other records fails to support local leaders’ claims of Abenaki ancestry 

Is Joseph Bruchac truly Abenaki?

Vaudry Beaudry Voudry Bowman and Bruchac Families

In addition to this detection within AncestryDNA etc, of triangulating the descendants of Louis Bowman (1844-1918) and that of the Vaudry/Beaudry/Voudry/Veaudry descendants from Charles Vaudry/Beaudry (1820-1896), Douglas Buchholz transparently sought ‘another-set-of-eyeballs’ i.e., more academically-genealogically and genetically inclined expert, via email communications with Jacques Beaugrand, PhD., of Dunham, Brome-Missisquoi, Qc., on May 04, 2023.

In conclusion of Beaugrand’s own evaluation based on the genetic and genealogical data (presented to him by Buchholz), Jacques sent email on June 18, 2023 to Douglas Lloyd Buchholz, the following:

According to the sharing of segments and the Thrulines generated by AncestryDNA, Simon VAUDRY is the most recent common ancestor of the contemporaries who were tested by this company.

The "Simon VAUDRY" effect passes obligatorily in people tested through Simon's children. Namely, (1) Brianna Rae SCHMELZER (through her mother Donna Lee WASHBURN) her VOUDRY DNA via Léandre VAUDRY (1810-1875), a son of Simon's first marriage to Catherine BOYER. (2) Michael LAUZON and Jean Pierre BEAUDRY received theirs via Charles VAUDRY, Simon's son from his second marriage Catherine CHAGNON.

Based on the total of autosomal DNA segments shared between Brianna Rae SCHMELZER (through her mother Donna Lee WASHBURN) or Michael LAUZON or Jean Pierre BEAUDRY and the BOWMANs, it appears that the BOWMANs are also descendants of Charles VAUDRY. In other words, the presence of autosomal DNA from Simon VAUDRY in the Louis BOWMAN (1844-1918) lineage can only be explained by the fact that Louis BOWMAN's father was one of Simon VAUDRY's sons. The fact that the autosomal DNA of Michael LAUZON, Jean Pierre BEAUDRY and the BOWMANs all converge onto son Louis Pierre “Charles” VAUDRY (1820-1896) strongly supports that Charles VAUDRY was also the genetic-contributing father of Louis BOWMAN (1844-1918).

The equation must take into account the fact that the BOWMAN men have the Y chromosome (yDNA) of the VAUDRY men who descend from Jacques VAUDRY (1636-1688) m. 1661 Jeanne RENAUD (1642-1714), which line includes descendants of Simon VAUDRY. This signature has been triangulated at https://bit.ly/46c7Uwr

Please note that the yDNA signature of the BOWMAN descendants of Louis BOWMAN (whose mother was Marie Élisabeth (Sophié) SÉNÉCAL dite LAFRAMBOISE and whose father was Charles VAUDRY) differs from those of the English-speaking BOWMANs of Great Britain and the British colonies https://bit.ly/43LiMjg. It differs as well from that of some French-Canadian BEAUDRYs (the yDNA signature of Toussaint BEAUDRY m 1670 Barbe BARBIER, can be found at https://bit.ly/3JdxY0A).

The yDNA signature of this VAUDRY/BOWMAN line of men has a clear European origins, and absolutely no pre-Columbian Amerindian ones.

In conclusion, the documentary information compiled by Douglas Lloyd Buchholz, as well as the results of the multiple DNA tests carried out by relatives of the VAUDRYs and the BOWMANs, clearly demonstrate that one of Simon VAUDRY's sons -- most likely Charles -- was the biological father of Louis/Lewis BOWMAN (1844-1918), from whom descend the BOWMANs tested in the present study.

Jacques P. BEAUGRAND, Ph.D., 

retired professor and researcher at UQAM,

Founder of the French Heritage DNA project and DNA consultant

CP 204, Dunham, Québec, Canada J0E1M0

E-mail: Beaugrand.jacques@uqam.ca

Throughout the Vaudry/Beaudry/Voudry and Bowman DNA Study, transparency and evaluation was necessary. Nothing is infallible or 'set-in-stone' or 'absolutes', yet the genetic results do not lie

Only beliefs & perceptions distort the results to fit-one’s-agenda(s), politically, or otherwise.

GENETIC DNA Matches (JPEGS) of Bowman Vaudry Beaudry and Senecal


Castonguay Raymond Documents

Senecal JPEG Documents

Of course, the Bruchac's are not actually Abénakis. Genetic DNA results and Genealogy PROVE OBJECTIVELY that they are not. Indeed the Bruchac's obtained "Abenaki" membership cards from Homer beginning in 1978, and thereafter, claiming to be Missisquoi (St. Francis-Sokoki) "Abenaki" members of the group led by Homer St. Francis Sr. and later, stating they were Nulhegan membership card-holders of that group which was merely formed in 2004, first led by Luke Andrew Willard, and later, Don Stevens Jr., obviously for the benefits and "legitimacy"...

As pathological "Abenaki" Pretendians, the Bruchac's in essence, pulled their loving grandfather Jesse Bowman out of his grave, and stuck a feather in his grandfather's scalp. It didn't matter what the REALITY and TRUTH of his grandfather Jesse, and great-grandfather Louis's histories were. Because Bruchac changed his grandfather's ethnicity, posthumously, and used his grandpa's life experiences and rebranded Jesse Bowman into an "Abenaki". ... making a career out of the lies he spewed about his Grandpa.

"Well, I'm a person of mixed ancestry. I was raised by my grandparents, who were actually on the English and American Indian side.

My grandfather, Jesse, was Abenaki Indian but was one of those people who in his generation did not talk about being Native American.

Question: Why was Louis and his son, Jesse Bowman (and siblings) all "hiding" their alleged Abénaki ancestry, heritage etc in lil' old Porters Corner all of his life, from the time they were born til the time they up and died in 1970, and yet THOUSANDS of Mohawks and A LOT of Abénakis derived from Odanak First Nation, living in New York, were not hiding anything about themselves being Mohawks and or Abénakis? Was Jesse Bowman really ever in Vermont? We know that Warren and Flossie Bowman went to Rutland County, Vermont in their lifetimes, and we know that their father Louis went into Vermont as well for a time, before he went to Troy, NY and eventually stayed in Porters Corners, Saratoga County, New York ca. 1870s. Yet, Louis came out of Granby, Quebec. All of his children were born in Saratoga County, New York. So what pray tell, would have caused Jesse Bowman to deny his alleged Abénaki father Louis Bowman = O'Bomsawin narrative? Because it was a lie created by Joseph Bruchac?! The narrative of Jesse Bowman having to hide being Native American, while Mohawk's and Abénakis in the state could not, seems on the merits, to yet another fallacy of Bruchac's. And why is that the Bowman's are not historically known, and I mean Louis nor his descendants, documented on any First Nations records. Many have bought into the myth that the reservations in the USA, and First Nations reserves in Canada did not keep written records but how they forget that Native People's had missions that did! Since 1675! 

About as far as he would go would be to talk about things like the fact that he left school in fourth grade because they kept calling him a dirty Indian and so he jumped out the window and, as he put it, never come back again.

Yes, going straight for the stereotypes. Joe picked this up and applied it to his grandfather, to make his grandfather BECOME an Indian, I surmise, AFTER Jesse Bowman had died.

His wife, my grandmother, was a highly literate woman, a graduate of what later became Skidmore College and had a house full of books.

And her ancestry, she proudly traced it back to the Mayflower, although there's some interesting things about that ancestry too, which are uncertain, but really somewhat colored as you might say.

On my dad's side of the family it's Slovak from a little place called – or not so little community called Trnava in Slovakia, not far from Bratislava.

And as a child I was aware of these ancestries, but wasn't really given a lot of information about them.

[How could Joe Bruchac III be aware of the Bowman ancestry of his grandfather Jesse' paternal father's ancestors, when in fact, Jesse Bowman's father was illegitimate at birth according to the June 11, 1845 Baptismal Record recorded in the parish of Notre Dame de Granby, Quebec, Canada?]

I was kind of in a state of ethnic denial because the Slovak side wanted you to be good Americans, and the Native American side wanted you to fit in with everybody else and not draw attention.

And then the English side, which is sort of there and not really paying much attention to history.

It was a period when I was born in 1942, during the war and after the war, of sort of American triumphalism and people wanting to think of the melting pot as really being a positive thing."

For having a loving grandfather, who raised his grandson "Sonny" ... Jesse Bowman sure did not end up not having a loving grandson IMHO. I mean, who would do this to their grandfather and ancestors? Jesse Bowman NEVER claimed to be an Abenaki, nor did that grandfather have any Abenaki culture, language or stories of the Abénakis. Oh that's right, they were all hiding-in-plain-sight according to Marge. Yet, Louis Bowman (1844-1918) NEVER was born or even in Odanak First Nation.

Jack Lynch (Joseph and Marge Bruchac's brother-in-law) even on March 07, 2002 stated, "There presently is a family group from this line that is circulating unfounded genealogical information for their personal economic benefit, so be careful."



Louis (1844-1918) Bowman was NEVER the child of Francois-Louis O'Bomsawin (1801-1888) and Agnes-Anne (Onlinass). Marge (Bruchac) while in Amsterdam, sought to imply her great-grandfather was an O'Bomsawin, by creating fraudulent pseudo "proof" by 'connecting' her great-grandfather Louis to an O'Bomsawin family in Odanak. 

No objective evidence (genealogically or genetically) was ever needed according to her or Joe in their subjective "Abenaki" claims for decades; just SAYING they were descendants of the Abénakis sufficed. 

I asked myself WHY (when I ran into this nosorigins.qc.ca entry in the summer of 2009) would Marge (Bruchac) do this after Vermont's waterfront 'Quad' Celebration (that she had attended with her brother and nephews) to her grandfather's father Louis?

 

The Bruchac's 'shit' on their families and ancestors for what, their respective careers predicated on a lie, that Louis Bowman (1844-1918) was an O'Bomsawin from "St Francis" (Odanak). What a gift / legacy to give to their Bruchac descendants. Such a shame.

Joe and Marge should put their heads together and write a book entitled "The LIES We Told About Our Grandfather Jesse" and also making Marie Elisabeth 'Sophie' Senecal dite Laframboise, a 100% French-Canadian mother of Louis (1844-1918) Bowman, into a Abénaki woman allegedly going to Washington, D.C. to claim her son Louis' Pension from the Civil War ... SMH. 

Why do I say the above? Because I have spent from 2003 and in particular focus, since 2015, seeking to secure the parentage of Louis Bowman, father of Jesse E. Bowman.

Initially in good faith I had solicited the Bruchac's to work with me in this Bowman DNA Study, but they rebuffed my endeavor, after I'd given the Wampanoag's the public chronologically formatted newspaper timeline regarding Bruchac's articles that I had compiled. Bruchac told his son Jesse, that they couldn't trust me. I was looking for a Bowman anyway, not a Bruchac to do a Y-DNA test.

In January 2016, I'd sought out a male Bowman descendant descended from Louis Bowman (1844-1918) and found Brady Sherlock on AncestryDNA, followed by Mark D. Sherlock his father, and wonderfully was informed by Mark through his son, of their neighbor, Robert Howard Bowman of Queensbury, NY. 


Robert Howard Bowman
son of 


Howard Leroy Bowman
son of 


John Jack Bowman
son of 


Louis (1844-1918) Bowman Sr.

This was a Bowman who carries the Y-DNA from his great-grandfather, inherited (passed down) through the direct-male-lineage. So whatever the Y-DNA results would be, would be passed down from Louis Bowman (1844-1918) Sr.'s unknown genetic-contributing father.

Robert H. Bowman's Y-DNA (at first) was R1b-M269 according to Family Tree DNA testing. With further in depth genetic testing of his DNA, it became further clear that the Y-DNA came from Europe and not from the Abénaki First Nation Peoples (either from Montagnais ouabanākionek (“people of the eastern country”) or from the Western Abénaki autonym Wôbanaki or an Eastern Abénaki/Penobscot cognate of the same, from Algonquin). So the question became WHO and WHERE did Louis (1840-1918) derive from, as to parentage.


As per previous posts in this blog and on social media Facebook, when I wasn't even really entertaining the endeavor of finding Louis Bowman's Baptismal record one evening, I actually did find it. Per his Civil War Pension Record of his own testimony, he had stated he was born July 20, 1844 in East Farnham, Quebec, Canada, but had declared that he could not find a birth record in East Farnham, Qc. 
Louis was hiding his illegitimacy I strongly suspect, as was his own mother, from the Civil War Pension Records agent George Lemon, (not their alleged Abénaki ancestral heritage). Suffice to say, that the Baptismal record of June 11, 1845 when he was 10 months of age, provided confirmation that his parents were Louis Senecal dit Laframboise and Marie Elisabeth (Benoit dite Livernois). Even though neither parent of the 10-month-old boy, was mentioned in the baptismal, his mother was indeed Marie Elisabeth 'Sophie' Senecal dite Laframboise born in 1810 per her own baptismal record in 1815 (in Notre Dame du Rosaire Parish) and who died in 1901 in (Ste. Patrice Parish) Magog, Qc. 
 
Louis Bowman's genetic-contributing father remained elusive for some years to my awareness, yet one day in FTDNA, a Peter W. S. Vaudry, matched to Robert H. Bowman and I emailed him in mid-September 2017 inquiring of his Vaudry paternal ancestry.

Followed by Y-DNA matches to Robert Bowman in FTDNA:


I myself sought out DNA samples from Thomas LaBeff, George Veaudry and Edward Veaudry, and well as autosomal DNA samples from other Bowman relatives of Robert Bowman in the ensuing years, seeking detection of the correct Vaudry paternal lineage of which the Bowman's seemed to have descended from. Robert Bowman is currently a confirmed Haplogroup R-FT94529, in France. The Vaudry lineage predominately was located in and around Lamberville, Normandy, France ca. 1600s until Jacques Vaudry immigrated into what has become Canada at Trois-Rivières, Quebec, having married there in 1661 to Jeanne Renaud.

I explain some of these developments and findings in the above file folders as well in the above URL's, so I won't bore anyone with that data explanation. I am still seeking a Direct-Male-Voudry Descendant to test their Y-DNA in comparative to that of the Bowman's and Vaudry's, including that of LeBoeuf/LaBeff's as well.

In April 2023, I detected a Jean Pierre Beaudry in AncestryDNA that matched to most of the Bowman descendants from Louis (1844-1919). Jean Pierre Beaudry derives from a Charles Vaudry/Beaudry (1818-but likely 1820 and died in 1896 in Montréal, Qc.), son of Simon Vaudry and Catherine Chagnon, also of Montréal, Qc.

In late April 2023, I began creating a mapping of the Bowman ancestral linage, as I have detected it objectively, based on the DNA and genealogical research I've conducted.


So, in conclusion, no, Joseph Edward Bruchac III, is not partly or in full, an Abénaki Indian, nor was his mother, her father Jesse E. Bowman, and neither was Louis (1844-1918) Bowman, let alone, Joe's sister, retired PhD Margaret "Marge" Bruchac either. 

CORRECTION: Marge retired from Penn (University of Pennsylvania in Philadelphia), an Ivy League University.

The Van Antwerp lineage of which Jesse E. Bowman descended maternally, has one single Ots-Toch, "the Mohawk Indian Princess" (much like Pocahontas) in the 1600s and seemingly a lineage that descends from a Montauk Indian ancestress as well, also in the 1600s. Consistently, the Van Antwerp's were identifying themselves as White European descendants, and they were not intermarrying back into Native Community, though the daughters of Ots-Toch were Mohawk interpreters. The descendants married into White families, not Indian families. The Dunham's were consistently White identifying, derived from White families as well, and were seemingly a 'well-to-do' progeny of which Jesse E. Bowman (1886-1970) married into, (after having married Katherine (Gray) Bowman in Dec. 1911 and having (seemingly) four children with him). 

Resulting in a divorce in a Special Session of the Court in November 1917, it was Katherine (Gray) 1m. Ritchie 2m. Bowman, who seems to have subsequently married a third time to Jesse's brother John Jack Bowman (1893-1973), taking her 4 children by Jesse, to be raised by his brother Jack Bowman! Whereupon Jesse Bowman remarried, into the Marion Edna Dunham family in 1917, eventually raising "Sonny" (Joseph Edward Bruchac III), son of his daughter, Marion Flora (Bowman) Bruchac (1921-1999).

END OF STORY. 

I did the research, and no, it was not 'cyber-stalking' or 'bad-jacketing' as Marge Bruchac assumes. I haven't communicated with the Bruchac's (any of them) since December 2015). 

It was just good old sleuthing research by someone without any credentials or PhD attached to their name, and nor was I seeking 'authority' or permission from the Bruchac's or anyone else, to do this research. Bruchac's didn't help me because they have always had something to hide (their lies and manipulations) ... while in contrast ... the Bowman's, Vaudry's and LaBeff's helped because they had something to share, and sought out the reality and truth of their ancestors.

What did Bruchac or his sister ever really know about their mother Marion's father Jesse's father Louis's ancestry (?), except what they cobbled together subjectively over the years, to their own benefit$ and profit$, that suited their own faulty beliefs and perceptions, as they respectively sought to mold themselves into Abénakis, their ancestors never were. Bruchac's certainly didn't go beyond Louis, their great-grandfather, because he was baptized illegitimate June 11, 1845 per the Notre Dame de Granby Parish records.

The research is never done, as there are a few more steps to take genetically-testing speaking, but soon it will be completed, regarding the Bowman's and the Vaudry's, from Charles, Louis's genetic-contributing father.

Bruchac's perpetuated 'Stolen Valor' tactics on Odanak First Nation, to a naive public, to benefit themselves, for anyone who would listen to their storytelling about the grandfather and great-grandfather they descend from. 

With Stolen Valor, there are criminal and societal consequences; in contrast, there ought to be consequences for what he and his sister have done against Odanak First Nation, and to other Tribal Communities. 

As for accusing Odanak First Nation of 'gatekeeping' Abénaki identity. They have the right, title, and interest; not to mention ancestral connections to what is now known as "Vermont" and "New Hampshire" to do so. 

Whose been gatekeeping Children's literary works all these years, with hundreds of Native books in every classroom? With the "I'm an Abenaki too" blurb therein.

Answer: Joseph Edward Bruchac, III.

Whose been gatekeeping the Wampum Belts? And invited a non-Status Pretendian group of Vermont into Sotheby's Auction House, when such group (Elnu) had NO LEGAL STANDING whatsoever to be there or involved in such matters? Thus giving the Elnu group of Pretendians "legitimacy" ... Did anyone consult with Akwesasne? Did she consult with Darren Bonaparte? (Doesn't seem neither were consulted whatsoever, and I have to ask why not?)

Answer: Margaret "Marge" (Bruchac).

Whose been gatekeeping the Abénaki Language at Middlebury College, at $3,000.00 a semester? Thus giving fellow pretendians in Vermont "legitimacy". 

Answer: Jesse Bruchac.

My thoughts are that any book or publication or presentation (audio or video) that implies that Joseph E. Bruchac III (and or his son's and grandchildren & Marge Bruchac) nor that Jesse Bowman or his father Louis were Abénakis" be removed from every educational institution/ agency, for the perpetuated lies that such are, IMHO. Joe Bruchac and his sister etc have sought to make themselves into Abénakis, any which way they could. The St. Francis-Sokoki Cards and now the Nulhegan Cards gave them alleged "legitimacy" that they then used and touted to a naive public audience. My question has always been WHO was Louis Bowman (1844-1918), his parentage and their ancestors, truthfully, objectively, including possible siblings, half-siblings, cousins, nieces and nephews? 

Who knew actually who "Sophie" really was, or that her son Louis had two half sisters?! 

I sincerely thank Bob Bowman and E. J. Bowman Sr and Jr., Mark Sherlock, Carol and Walter Jones, Bruce Geroux, and so many others for helping me. I also thank the Bruchac's themselves, for without their 'resistance' in their snark, their arrogance and denials, and storytelling about their familial roots, I would never have noticed Jack Lynch's post in Genforum or the nosorigins.qc.ca stunt by Marge, etc. 

Marge insinuated that I am a cyber-stalker, and that I have lied about their Bowman ancestor Louis, but she has NOTHING to substantiate her claims.

JUNE 19, 2018


Fake DNA results from people who have never given my person their samples?

 


Does this look FAKE to anyone?


If the Bowman's had not provided their swabs or spit for the DNA testing, then this particular post would not be viable in SHOWING the DNA results. 

Even to Marge Bruchac herself! As she did in fact, test in FTDNA and AncestryDNA, matching to Robert Bowman, BEFORE January 2016. 

IF I didn't have the Bowman DNA that Bruchac's are descended from and related to, how was it that I screen-captured Marge Bruchac genetically atDNA matching to Bowman Bowman in FTDNA and AncestryDNA when Bob had tested in both genetic-testing companies in January 2016? 

My research has been very open (transparent) with both the Bowman's and the Bruchac's throughout.

Yet, Marge Bruchac whined and decried my research on social media January 17, 2021 on January 24, 2021.


It didn't take a rocket scientist nor a PhD Academic
 or anyone with professional credentials whatsoever 
to locate Louis' 1845 Baptismal or map the genealogical 
ancestors of his parentage.

WHY does an academic such as Marge (or Joe her brother) who profess to be ethically professional credentialed people, fraudulently "attach" their great-grandfather to an Odanak Abénakis, as per the O'Bomsawin-Olinass family, in the summer of 2009 in nosorigins.qc.ca?

And Marge Bruchac, just before she hastily retired from Penn State with full retirement benefits, but still a "volunteer" to Penn State, stated this in June of 2023 about my person libelously, and also about Leroux and Watso:

"The identity attacks on my family, over three decades, have been driven in large part by the work of a cyber-stalker and amateur internet researcher who goes by the aliases "Salmon Raven Deer" and Mark Leckie, but his given name is Douglas Lloyd Buchholz. He used to falsely identify himself as Abenaki, and he began this slander campaign after he was ousted from the Missisquoi Abenaki community in the 1990s for being a convicted pedophile and stalker. He (Douglas Lloyd Buchholz) has no academic, genealogical, tribal, or other credentials whatsoever. His website - called "The Reinvention of the Alleged Vermont and New Hampshire Abenaki" - and his Facebook pages mix true and false genealogical data with innuendo and slander, much of it intensely focused on my family, illustrated by photos and cherry-picked documents, twisted genealogical chains, distorted conclusions, and outright lies.

Then there is the fraught "research" conducted by Dr. Darryl Leroux, Associate Professor of Social Justice at St. Mary's University, whose book "Distorted Descent: White Claims to Indigenous Identity" (University of Manitoba Press 2019) focused on investigations of the newly sprung "Algonquin" groups in Canada made up of white people (many of them white supremacists) who have self-identified as "Metis" to claim First Nations lands and rights. This was a very necessary critique, but it had unexpected ripple effects when Leroux expanded his theoretical grouping into the United States. Relying on a number of fraught, racially biased, non-scholarly sources - including Buchholz's website - Leroux collectively, and inaccurately, identified all of the Vermont and New Hampshire Abenaki nations as "Eastern Metis Organizations." His argument was constructed, in part, around an unauthorized anti-Vermont-Abenaki "Council Resolution" that did not actually come from the Tribal Council at Odanak First Nation. It was released by Odanak citizen Jacques Theriault Watso, without the approval or sanction of Odanak Chief Rick Obomsawin."

My Response to her vile diatribe of falsehoods:

1. How and when was I ever determined to be a "pedophile" by any psychiatrist and or doctors (and I have been evaluated by many in retrospective) and/or convicted of any crime whatsoever?

Now ask yourselves this question: 

2. If I was falsely identifying myself as Abenaki,  then why did I do so (AFTER I got the membership card signed by Michael Delaney of Homer St. Francis' group in Swanton), before traveling 3,000+ miles across the United States? If I were falsifying my self-identity, ought it not to be the responsibility of said "tribe" / group to discern the truth BEFORE issuing said membership card to an applicant, who claims they are "Abenaki"? No one was validating objectively whether I had Abenaki ancestry in 1994. But that also applies to 1978 when Marge's brother Joe Bruchac obtained his "Abenaki" Card from the same group as well, does it not?

I live in HUD Housing (Section 8), and Federal and State Law states that one cannot be a convicted felon or convicted of sexual offense, and reside in HUD Housing. So how have I ever been a convicted pedophile. Take all the time one needs (including Marge) to realize how stupidly unfounded the accusation is, coming from Marge Bruchac herself.

Marge Bruchac is an educated academic and yet, she's too stupid or arrogant to realize the fallacy of her accusations against my person, and that such are explicitly unfound BS "spoon-fed to her" by her fellow WHITE pretendian "Abenakis" of Vermont. It's blatantly absurd the idiocy of Marge's rant of June 2023.
Coincidentally, or not, she spewed this vitriol AFTER my May 30, 2023 Facebook postings 'outing' the genetics results that Louis Bowman (1844-1918) being the son of Charles Vaudry / Beaudry (ca. 1820-1896).

As for Marge's further accusations against my person, I surmise that anyone worth their salt or merit, reviewing the URL's above in this post, can indeed ascertain the merits of my research, and that of the DNA results that match the Bruchac's cousin's the Bowman's to the specific Vaudry ancestor, father of Louis (1844-1918), being Charles Vaudry / Beaudry (1820-1896). 

Marge & Joe can keep believing their are Abenaki descendants. But this Salmon knows the truth of their lies. Is Marge Bruchac going to deny that she herself tested at FTDNA and AncestryDNA? Is she going to say that the DNA results of Earl John Bowman Sr. and Jr., and Bob Bowman et al are merely lies too?
Her dismissiveness of the research and genetic results connecting Louis Bowman (1844-1918) to Charles Vaudry SHOWS the Bruchac arrogant denialism, due to inflated egotistical self-importance.

3. Does Jacques Watso need the approval of Rick Obomsawin as an Abénaki, to release a Council Resolution? I think not.

4. Darryl Leroux, reviewed documentation of his own accord, without influence from my person and also academically, using common sense, Mr. Leroux could see the fallacy of the Vermont "Abenaki." There is no objective evidence that Darryl Leroux was influenced by anything I put online. Leroux doesn't mention my name in his book, nor in his excellent Exposé regarding the Vermont groups: State Recognition and the Dangers of Race Shifting: The Case of Vermont

5. Does one gain the indication whatsoever that he relied on anything I have ever done on this blog or otherwise, directly or indirectly? The same applies to Jacques T. Watso or anyone else in or from Odanak First Nation, or any other for that matter.

Yet, IF I have benefited the awareness of both academics, actual Abénakis and other First Nations Peoples, and especially the public with this blog and other social media posts, then the purpose of my own research, have been positively beneficial. Not so beneficial to the Vermont-New Hampshire "Abenaki" Pretendians assuredly.

Simply take what Marge or Joseph Bruchac have claimed as "facts" about their grandfather and that of his father Louis, over the years, and compare it to the results of genetic DNA, both yDNA and atDNA, including the genealogical research mappings, and arrive at one's own conclusions as to the truthfulness or fallacy of the data itself. Who's lied and whose sought out the objective truth about Jesse Bowman and his father Louis? Call me a "convicted pedophile", and "a liar"; such slander or libel matters not to me. Reality and TRUTH and FACTS will always 'trump' the Pretendians / grifters vitriol lies and smear campaign against my person, or of anyone else doing the necessary research.

6. Did Marge or Joe ever actually bother to look for the reality and truth of their Bowman ancestor Louis's parentage, after Marge obtained Louis' Pension record from National Archives pre-2006 after Odanak Chief Gilles O'Bomsawin sent them these two letters? I think not.



Communications with the Pretendians in the USA by Odanak Chiefs Walter G. Watso &
Rick O'Bomsawin retrospectively with Paul Pouliot and others, gave the "Abenaki" Pretendians in the States "legitimacy" and "platform" retrospectively-speaking.

Odanak First Nations Chief Gilles O'Bomsawin fought (as he could) against the fallacies of legitimacy
of the "Abenaki" Pretendians in both Vermont and New Hampshire.










The Pouliot's are not Laurentian Iroquois.
The Pouliot's are not Abénakis.
They are Pretendians.
Created by Howard F. Knight Jr. of VT in 1992
residents of Franklin, Massachusetts
of Alton, New Hampshire today.



Gilles O'Bomsawin sent a very kind letter of inquiry as to Rick Pouliot's alleged Abénaki ancestry claims. Gilles apparently did not receive response nor obtain Rick Pouliot's objective Abénaki ancestry. Because Rick Pouliot never was an Abénaki in the first place. He only has Marie Sylvestre Prevost of the mid-1600s who was Huron-Algonquin; NOT Abénaki.





Now boys & girls, gents & ladies, you KNOW WHY Frederick M. Wiseman PhD. and member of the Homer St. Francis Sr. group was referring in his 'assaultive' vitriol  against Odanak First Nation. Because Gilles, upon Wiseman's request for his own "legitimization" as to being an "Abenaki" was denied by Gilles, because Wiseman PhD. was never an Abenaki, and neither was Wiseman's paternal grandmother Josephine, either an Abénaki woman (descendant), as her grandson LIED about her too (just like the Bruchac's lied about their grandfather).


Gilles O'Bomsawin requested that Wiseman PhD. provide objective genealogical evidence of Abénaki
descent. Apparently Frederick Matthew Wiseman could not provide such evidence documentarily, because he never had it in the first place? But hey, he had a laminated Homer Card. That was good enough for the naive public and politicians of Vermont. Subsequently, Wiseman went on the "warpath" against Odanak and sought to separate the "U.S. Abenakis" from the "Canadian Abénakis" by mockingly disparagingly calling Odanak Abénakis EX-PATRIOTS. And implying that the RPPC Postcard of the late Odanak Chief Nicolas Panadis, was somehow tied to the post-1975 group in Swanton, VT claiming to be "Vermont Abenakis". Nicholas Panadis Chief of the Wabanacus Various Data and Images



Gilles O'Bomsawin began seriously detecting the Vermont "Abenaki" fallacies.




The chief of the "Abenaki Nation of New Hampshire" was also sent a letter from Gilles, requesting kindly objective evidence of Charles Francis True Jr.'s "Abenaki" ancestry. I surmise that Odanak Chief Gilles was met with the same 'snark' and arrogance from Mr. True, as Gilles received from the Bruchac's.







Ralph Skinner Swett was NOT an Abenaki.


Judy (Fortin) Dow is NOT an Abenaki.




April (St. Francis) Merrill was looking to Odanak for "legitimacy" from Gilles?

7 months later the Bureau of Federal Acknowledgement's Report came out.




6. Remember/recall what Jack Lynch said in March of 2002 about his brother-in-law Joseph and sister-in-law Margaret Bruchac, and Joe's two sons James and Jesse Bruchac. 

7. Evaluate when Marge Bruchac went to Amsterdam in the summer of 2009 and who would have had a vested interest in "attaching" Louis (1844-1918) to an O'Bomsawin Odanak Abénakis family.

Marge Bruchac SHOWS no objective evidence that I was ever convicted of anything in a Court of Law, nor any evidence that I am a pedophile, or that I have (as she put it) mixed true and false genealogical data with innuendo and slander, much of it intensely focused on her Bruchac family, illustrated by photos and cherry-picked documents, or that I twisted genealogical chains, distorting conclusions, and outright lied. 

To claim that I hold no academic, genealogical, tribal, or other credentials whatsoever, is again, her and their assumptions. No one knows my training, my skills, my affiliations or my credentials. Just because I don't tout a "Dr." at the beginning of my name nor a "PhD" at the end of such, does not necessarily mean I am without training or credentials. But that is here nor there, my EGO is not as inflated as Dr. Marge Bruchac PhD.'s eh.


So, yes, I was mandated by Richard "Skip" Bernier in 2011 onward, to do as I have, genetically and genealogically, socially and historically, to evaluate and document the Pretendian groups of "Abenakis" in Vermont and New Hampshire, and the memberships thereof. 
Richard Bernier is an active Status citizen and member of Odanak, as his late mother Melvina (Obomsawin/Robert) Bernier, Odanak Abénaki woman, who married Elias Bernier.
 
I have the documentation of MANY THOUSANDS of Pretendian "Abenakis" and their doings. As one can review, I also have Gilles O'Bomsawin's 2003 letters to the Pretendians, such as Joseph and Marge Bruchac, et al.


Objectively, I would say that if anyone is spewing innuendo and slandering / libeling, it is Marge Bruchac herself, et al. which has been documented, screen-captured and archived as well over the years since the smear-campaign began by these Pretendian "Abenakis". It has been she and her brother, including his son Jesse who have cherry-picked documents and twisted genealogical tidbits, distorting conclusions and outright lied, IMHO.


So if Joe & Marge (and their descendants) are not descendants of the Abénaki, how can they legitimately be Nulhegan Abenaki members?! Because the "tribe" is a bunch of WHITE People? I conclude as much.

Nulhegan A-3 members? What is A-3? 

Answer: Nulhegan's membership (so I have been told by a Vermont Nulhegan member) are merely A-3, meaning that within the group Bruchac's have no voting rights, and that (quote) Don Stevens gave the Bruchac's just something to give them a home while they complete their research". Yet, Bruchac claims he's on the Nulhegan Elder's Council. (Well, he is 80 years old ...). Don Stevens (Nulhegan ... formerly of Homer's group) and the Bruchac's joined hands, in "legitimizing each other" ... go figure ...

Jesse Bruchac, Joe's son speaks Abenaki. That MUST make Jesse a Nulhegan Abenaki? Or does that simply give him "legitimacy" in his BECOMING an "Abenaki" to further the Bruchac agendas?

If I buy Rosetta Stone learning to speak German, does that make me a German? If I decided to wear Lederhosen when I go shopping does that make me a German? If I have the surname Buchholz, does that make me German? Perhaps naive people would conclude YES! But I am actually descended from a Seattle-based SMITH family that descended from Sweden that came over to this country in the 1630s paternally. Or better yet, I can pretend I am a Scots because of course, my birth certificate indicates my father was born in Bellshill, Scotland adjacent to Motherwell, below Glasgow eh?! But how I digress...

Oh that's right, the 4 groups in Vermont implying their groups are "tribes" based on the State of Vermont politic legislature, imply that CULTURE trumps actually CONNECTION ANCESTRALLY to the Historical Abenakis.

Why did the Bruchac's and others leave or get ousted from the Swanton-based Missisquoi St- Francis-Sokoki group led by Homer and his daughter April prior to 2009-2010? Perhaps the Bruchac's (et al) weren't getting enough benefits or "legitimacy" what with April (St. Francis) Merrill and subsequently Louise (Lampman) Larrivée and Candy (nee: Lapan) Thomas stealing $$$$$$. Too many thieves in one "tribe" for the comfort of the Bruchac's eh?

Did the Bruchac's too get a 'letter of deficiency' (for not having objectively proven descent from the Abenakis) from Carol (born GROMATSKI) Nepton? Or was it because they also received membership cards, due to Homer St. Francis Sr. or Mike Delaney favoring them in a dynamic of "you-pat-my-back, and Homer patted theirs", thus mutually "legitimizing" each other through the years? So the Bruchac's jumped from the one group to another, where they could get more favor, more "legitimacy" more benefits? Now they are post 2004-Nulhegan "Abenaki".

What does this say and show about the Nulhegan group formed in 2004 and their membership criteria? Or that of any of the other 5-6 "Abenaki" groups in VT-NH etc?

That they are bringing in members who are not Abenakis at all? Who are getting Vermont State benefits over other citizens of the state based on FRAUD? Because they are bringing in WHITE PEOPLE who are Playing Indian? The list is long who are members of these groups who are actually NOT Abenakis. That's the point isn't it? Creating FAKE "Abenaki" members ... 

That the members have to objectively genealogically documented objective evidence of their descent from the Abénakis, historically? Or does implied "culture" trumps actual Abenaki descent?

Because the Bruchac's (and 99.999% percent of Vermont & New Hampshire's "Abenaki") never were Abénakis in the first place.

Genealogy and DNA Results prove this out (FINALLY) 100% percent, that Louis Bowman (1844-1918) was the child of two 100% French Canadian people. When Jesse Elmer Bowman stated he was French, he wasn't lying.

In April 2023, Joseph Bruchac, stated, "Know yourself. Know your roots. Know your stories, before you begin to borrow or take someone else's."

Well, what has Joseph Bruchac and Marge (his sister) done but take other people's stories and made them their own. Taken someone else's roots (O'Bomsawin ancestors) and made them their own. 

Of course, they have done so, because it has been quite profitable and popular to do so, and in between those lines in many spoken presentations and published books, both have declared "their grandfather Jesse Bowman and or Jesse's father Louis were Abénakis, from "St. Francis"/ Odanak" and thereby IMPLYING that Joe and Marge themselves are Abenakis, touting first their Homer Cards or now their Nulhegan Cards as "legitimacy" to their claims of Abénaki/Abenaki ethnicity.

Recently, per the September 30, 2023 in the Times Union Newspaper by Chris Churchill article entitled "Churchill: Is Joseph Bruchac truly Abenaki?" (URL at the top of this post), Joseph Bruchac III, stated defensively, that (quote) ...

"Native heritage is not only about blood and ancestry". He suggested cultural membership can be learned and earned with hard work and sincere attention, comparable in some respects to his mastery of karate.

“Am I not a black belt because I wasn’t born as one?” he asked.

Yesterday, I was reading (again)  the book "Becoming Indian: The Struggle over Cherokee Identity in the Twenty-first Century" by Circe Sturm (© 2010), and came upon Page 140-141, and it is indeed an interesting point of view (thought) from an Eastern Band United Keetoowah Cherokee, Robert Thompson in his early 40s.

Mr. Thompson explained that "We get so many people calling for genealogy. They want to do this, and I tell them, I say "You can spend years trying to track down your ancestry to prove that you're a Cherokee. Now why don't you learn the Cherokee language? Why don't you learn the Cherokee history? Why don't you do the Cherokee culture? Why don't you really become Cherokee? (October 22, 2003). 

In other words blood ties (genealogical descent) and their documentation have their place, but real Cherokeeness comes from walking the walk and talking the talk, both of which can be learned at almost any stage of life by anyone who claims they are Cherokee, and wants to become Cherokee. 

Thompson felt that to "become Cherokee" someone must be willing to put in the hard work of learning about Cherokee history and culture.

So, in essence, becoming Cherokee or Abenaki, is today, like putting on a coat, hat, and footwear, to 'look' authentic, and pulling 'culture' from books, CDs or DVDs, museums and powwows etc. and grasping the ability to say O-Si-Yo? (Hello is O-Si-Yo in Cherokee)

Merry Cherokee Christmas Principal Chief of the Cherokee Nation Chuck Hoskins Jr., my Grandmother SAID ... 😆 ... that her father-in-law James Corby Woodard, of Norton-Stuttgart, Phillips County, Kansas "was a Cherokee Chief" does that now make me a Cherokee too? I think not. 

Guess who this is in the early 1980s at 12-13 years of age?

If I go to a Cherokee gathering as a guest, or go to a powwow held by a Cherokee Nation sponsor, does that make me Cherokee? I think not. If I learn how to speak Cherokee from a Cherokee speaker, does that make me a Cherokee Indian? I think not. I am not naive as I was as a younger person. I educated myself, evaluating beliefs/perceptions vs. truths and realities.

And yet, the Cherokee Nation of Oklahoma brings in (allows) less than 1% descendants of Cherokee ancestry, who's descendants dye their hair black, and who pontificate how 'super Cherokee' they were/are, having never been raised within Cherokee Nation Community, whose ancestors consistently married White men from the 1700s into the present time.

Does 'culture' trumping actual Cherokee "blood" genealogical connections? Just thinking out loud here. I myself am not Cherokee (never claimed to be whatsoever) and neither was my mother, or her father or his father, James C. Woodard, or his ancestors! But hey, my Grandma Said So!


Bruchac's are of the mindset that "cultural belonging" to the Vermont Pretendians of these "Abenaki" "tribes" now sanctioned by fraudulent Vermont State Recognition since 2006 into 2012, that a person of merely goodwill, believing that their grandfather Jesse or his father Louis had Abénaki/Abenaki ancestral connections even without objective evidence whatsoever, that the Bruchac's could work hard to learn Abénaki culture, language, and dances, and as such in doing that, become a insidious part of the "Abenaki" "community" ... just like Sylvain Rivard worked hard to BECOME "Abénaki" ... of Odanak.

Bruchac's aren't the only FAKE "Abenaki" of Vermont-New Hampshire ...




And they hoodwinked Wabanaki First Nations as well ...


MORE FAKE "ABENAKI" in New Hampshire ...




Paul Wilson Pouliot became a member of Howard Knight Jr.'s "Abenaki" "Cowasuck" group in the summer of 1992, as a "Laurentian Iroquois" per his application, and by December 1992, he had become a "chief" of the "Abenaki Nation of Vermont" INCORPORATED (created by an "Abenaki" fraud, the late Howard Franklin Knight, Jr., et al.), because he and they were and are FRAUDULENT "Abenakis" of Vermont-New Hampshire!

Paul W. Pouliot's "Cowasuck Band of the Pennacook-Abenaki" Incorporate headquarters "tribe" is in Alton, New Hampshire, what with Paul and his second wife, having moved from Massachusetts, to gain "legitimacy" and platform. Staging for better benefit$ ... in their "I'm an Abenaki too" grifting/scheming persona's.

The "Abenaki Nation of New Hampshire" Incorporated in Whitefield, N.H ... and MANY groups in New Hampshire were created and organized by Pretendians / "Abenaki culture vultures"...


Joseph Paul Bunnell's group is in Alstead, New Hampshire

His group are a mere SPIN OFF from another FRAUDULENT "tribe"
in Vermont Created by the late Nancy (Millette) in 2006.

Same old song and dance by FRAUDULENT "Abenakis"

I mean seriously, do the Wannabiiak (Pretendians)
and
Race Shifters Believe their own BS?

Of course they do.

Paul Bunnell claims he has HUNDREDS of Native Ancestors.

They all IGNORE their 99.9999% of their WHITE Ancestors ...

Then how come they all look so WHITE and PALE?

Why do they (Wiseman and Bruchac's, et al) not objectively & ancestrally connect to the HISTORICAL ANCESTRAL Abénakis? 
Yet they have Nulhegan cards?

How can the Bruchac's be Abénakis without having Abénakis Ancestry?

Oh that's right, they just made it up since the 1970s.
Their ancestors were hiding-in-plain-sight according to Joe & Marge.

It was Charles Vaudry/Beaudry (1820-1896) who was hiding-in-plain-sight
Right along with the Baptismal Record of June 11, 1845 of Louis.

Sophie and her son were not hiding their Abénakis heritage, culture or identities.

They were hiding the illegitimacy of his birth to an unwed mother in 1844!

In truth, the article of late by Chris Churchill, Joseph Bruchac pretty much admitted he isn't an Abénaki, as he has implied since the 1970s.

THINK ABOUT THAT.

Take all the time one needs to realize what he's done since the 1970s.

The fallacies were all predicated on a lie about his grandfather and great grandfather.

For PROFIT$ and "LEGITIMACY" as "Abenakis"

Marge, as an academic in the Northeast, perpetuated and embellished the lies 
not only about Jesse Bowman and his father Louis, but also Louis' mother!


100% TRUTH












Search This Blog